Literature DB >> 33545030

Topologically associating domain boundaries that are stable across diverse cell types are evolutionarily constrained and enriched for heritability.

Evonne McArthur1, John A Capra2.   

Abstract

Topologically associating domains (TADs) are fundamental units of three-dimensional (3D) nuclear organization. The regions bordering TADs-TAD boundaries-contribute to the regulation of gene expression by restricting interactions of cis-regulatory sequences to their target genes. TAD and TAD-boundary disruption have been implicated in rare-disease pathogenesis; however, we have a limited framework for integrating TADs and their variation across cell types into the interpretation of common-trait-associated variants. Here, we investigate an attribute of 3D genome architecture-the stability of TAD boundaries across cell types-and demonstrate its relevance to understanding how genetic variation in TADs contributes to complex disease. By synthesizing TAD maps across 37 diverse cell types with 41 genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we investigate the differences in disease association and evolutionary pressure on variation in TADs versus TAD boundaries. We demonstrate that genetic variation in TAD boundaries contributes more to complex-trait heritability, especially for immunologic, hematologic, and metabolic traits. We also show that TAD boundaries are more evolutionarily constrained than TADs. Next, stratifying boundaries by their stability across cell types, we find substantial variation. Compared to boundaries unique to a specific cell type, boundaries stable across cell types are further enriched for complex-trait heritability, evolutionary constraint, CTCF binding, and housekeeping genes. Thus, considering TAD boundary stability across cell types provides valuable context for understanding the genome's functional landscape and enabling variant interpretation that takes 3D structure into account.
Copyright © 2021 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hi-C; TAD stability; Topologically associating domain; complex disease; evolutionary conservation; genome 3D structure; genome topology; heritability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33545030      PMCID: PMC7895846          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  81 in total

1.  Comparing 3D Genome Organization in Multiple Species Using Phylo-HMRF.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yang Zhang; Bing Ren; Jesse R Dixon; Jian Ma
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 10.304

2.  Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Jesse R Dixon; Inkyung Jung; Siddarth Selvaraj; Yin Shen; Jessica E Antosiewicz-Bourget; Ah Young Lee; Zhen Ye; Audrey Kim; Nisha Rajagopal; Wei Xie; Yarui Diao; Jing Liang; Huimin Zhao; Victor V Lobanenkov; Joseph R Ecker; James A Thomson; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.

Authors:  Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Nynke L van Berkum; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Tobias Ragoczy; Agnes Telling; Ido Amit; Bryan R Lajoie; Peter J Sabo; Michael O Dorschner; Richard Sandstrom; Bradley Bernstein; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Andreas Gnirke; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Leonid A Mirny; Eric S Lander; Job Dekker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Tom Sexton; Eitan Yaffe; Ephraim Kenigsberg; Frédéric Bantignies; Benjamin Leblanc; Michael Hoichman; Hugues Parrinello; Amos Tanay; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture.

Authors:  Matteo Vietri Rudan; Christopher Barrington; Stephen Henderson; Christina Ernst; Duncan T Odom; Amos Tanay; Suzana Hadjur
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Distinct structural transitions of chromatin topological domains correlate with coordinated hormone-induced gene regulation.

Authors:  François Le Dily; Davide Baù; Andy Pohl; Guillermo P Vicent; François Serra; Daniel Soronellas; Giancarlo Castellano; Roni H G Wright; Cecilia Ballare; Guillaume Filion; Marc A Marti-Renom; Miguel Beato
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Comparison of computational methods for the identification of topologically associating domains.

Authors:  Marie Zufferey; Daniele Tavernari; Elisa Oricchio; Giovanni Ciriello
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  DeepC: predicting 3D genome folding using megabase-scale transfer learning.

Authors:  Ron Schwessinger; Matthew Gosden; Damien Downes; Richard C Brown; A Marieke Oudelaar; Jelena Telenius; Yee Whye Teh; Gerton Lunter; Jim R Hughes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Luke Jostins; Stephan Ripke; Rinse K Weersma; Richard H Duerr; Dermot P McGovern; Ken Y Hui; James C Lee; L Philip Schumm; Yashoda Sharma; Carl A Anderson; Jonah Essers; Mitja Mitrovic; Kaida Ning; Isabelle Cleynen; Emilie Theatre; Sarah L Spain; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Philippe Goyette; Zhi Wei; Clara Abraham; Jean-Paul Achkar; Tariq Ahmad; Leila Amininejad; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Vibeke Andersen; Jane M Andrews; Leonard Baidoo; Tobias Balschun; Peter A Bampton; Alain Bitton; Gabrielle Boucher; Stephan Brand; Carsten Büning; Ariella Cohain; Sven Cichon; Mauro D'Amato; Dirk De Jong; Kathy L Devaney; Marla Dubinsky; Cathryn Edwards; David Ellinghaus; Lynnette R Ferguson; Denis Franchimont; Karin Fransen; Richard Gearry; Michel Georges; Christian Gieger; Jürgen Glas; Talin Haritunians; Ailsa Hart; Chris Hawkey; Matija Hedl; Xinli Hu; Tom H Karlsen; Limas Kupcinskas; Subra Kugathasan; Anna Latiano; Debby Laukens; Ian C Lawrance; Charlie W Lees; Edouard Louis; Gillian Mahy; John Mansfield; Angharad R Morgan; Craig Mowat; William Newman; Orazio Palmieri; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Uros Potocnik; Natalie J Prescott; Miguel Regueiro; Jerome I Rotter; Richard K Russell; Jeremy D Sanderson; Miquel Sans; Jack Satsangi; Stefan Schreiber; Lisa A Simms; Jurgita Sventoraityte; Stephan R Targan; Kent D Taylor; Mark Tremelling; Hein W Verspaget; Martine De Vos; Cisca Wijmenga; David C Wilson; Juliane Winkelmann; Ramnik J Xavier; Sebastian Zeissig; Bin Zhang; Clarence K Zhang; Hongyu Zhao; Mark S Silverberg; Vito Annese; Hakon Hakonarson; Steven R Brant; Graham Radford-Smith; Christopher G Mathew; John D Rioux; Eric E Schadt; Mark J Daly; Andre Franke; Miles Parkes; Severine Vermeire; Jeffrey C Barrett; Judy H Cho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A genome-wide association study of anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  V Boraska; C S Franklin; J A B Floyd; L M Thornton; L M Huckins; L Southam; N W Rayner; I Tachmazidou; K L Klump; J Treasure; C M Lewis; U Schmidt; F Tozzi; K Kiezebrink; J Hebebrand; P Gorwood; R A H Adan; M J H Kas; A Favaro; P Santonastaso; F Fernández-Aranda; M Gratacos; F Rybakowski; M Dmitrzak-Weglarz; J Kaprio; A Keski-Rahkonen; A Raevuori; E F Van Furth; M C T Slof-Op 't Landt; J I Hudson; T Reichborn-Kjennerud; G P S Knudsen; P Monteleone; A S Kaplan; A Karwautz; H Hakonarson; W H Berrettini; Y Guo; D Li; N J Schork; G Komaki; T Ando; H Inoko; T Esko; K Fischer; K Männik; A Metspalu; J H Baker; R D Cone; J Dackor; J E DeSocio; C E Hilliard; J K O'Toole; J Pantel; J P Szatkiewicz; C Taico; S Zerwas; S E Trace; O S P Davis; S Helder; K Bühren; R Burghardt; M de Zwaan; K Egberts; S Ehrlich; B Herpertz-Dahlmann; W Herzog; H Imgart; A Scherag; S Scherag; S Zipfel; C Boni; N Ramoz; A Versini; M K Brandys; U N Danner; C de Kovel; J Hendriks; B P C Koeleman; R A Ophoff; E Strengman; A A van Elburg; A Bruson; M Clementi; D Degortes; M Forzan; E Tenconi; E Docampo; G Escaramís; S Jiménez-Murcia; J Lissowska; A Rajewski; N Szeszenia-Dabrowska; A Slopien; J Hauser; L Karhunen; I Meulenbelt; P E Slagboom; A Tortorella; M Maj; G Dedoussis; D Dikeos; F Gonidakis; K Tziouvas; A Tsitsika; H Papezova; L Slachtova; D Martaskova; J L Kennedy; R D Levitan; Z Yilmaz; J Huemer; D Koubek; E Merl; G Wagner; P Lichtenstein; G Breen; S Cohen-Woods; A Farmer; P McGuffin; S Cichon; I Giegling; S Herms; D Rujescu; S Schreiber; H-E Wichmann; C Dina; R Sladek; G Gambaro; N Soranzo; A Julia; S Marsal; R Rabionet; V Gaborieau; D M Dick; A Palotie; S Ripatti; E Widén; O A Andreassen; T Espeseth; A Lundervold; I Reinvang; V M Steen; S Le Hellard; M Mattingsdal; I Ntalla; V Bencko; L Foretova; V Janout; M Navratilova; S Gallinger; D Pinto; S W Scherer; H Aschauer; L Carlberg; A Schosser; L Alfredsson; B Ding; L Klareskog; L Padyukov; P Courtet; S Guillaume; I Jaussent; C Finan; G Kalsi; M Roberts; D W Logan; L Peltonen; G R S Ritchie; J C Barrett; X Estivill; A Hinney; P F Sullivan; D A Collier; E Zeggini; C M Bulik
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  23 in total

1.  scREMOTE: Using multimodal single cell data to predict regulatory gene relationships and to build a computational cell reprogramming model.

Authors:  Andy Tran; Pengyi Yang; Jean Y H Yang; John T Ormerod
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 2.  Enhancer-gene specificity in development and disease.

Authors:  Tomás Pachano; Endika Haro; Alvaro Rada-Iglesias
Journal:  Development       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.862

3.  The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dynisty Wright; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 4.  Super-Enhancers, Phase-Separated Condensates, and 3D Genome Organization in Cancer.

Authors:  Seng Chuan Tang; Udhaya Vijayakumar; Ying Zhang; Melissa Jane Fullwood
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Duplications disrupt chromatin architecture and rewire GPR101-enhancer communication in X-linked acrogigantism.

Authors:  Martin Franke; Adrian F Daly; Leonor Palmeira; Amit Tirosh; Antonio Stigliano; Eszter Trifan; Fabio R Faucz; Dayana Abboud; Patrick Petrossians; Juan J Tena; Eleonora Vitali; Andrea G Lania; José L Gómez-Skarmeta; Albert Beckers; Constantine A Stratakis; Giampaolo Trivellin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 11.043

Review 6.  The stochastic nature of genome organization and function.

Authors:  Varun Sood; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.665

Review 7.  Non-coding regulatory elements: Potential roles in disease and the case of epilepsy.

Authors:  Susanna Pagni; James D Mills; Adam Frankish; Jonathan M Mudge; Sanjay M Sisodiya
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.250

8.  How to Use Online Tools to Generate New Hypotheses for Mammary Gland Biology Research: A Case Study for Wnt7b.

Authors:  Yorick Bernardus Cornelis van de Grift; Nika Heijmans; Renée van Amerongen
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 9.  Super-enhancers: a new frontier for epigenetic modifiers in cancer chemoresistance.

Authors:  Guo-Hua Li; Qiang Qu; Ting-Ting Qi; Xin-Qi Teng; Hai-Hong Zhu; Jiao-Jiao Wang; Qiong Lu; Jian Qu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-19

10.  Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits.

Authors:  Evonne McArthur; David C Rinker; John A Capra
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.