Literature DB >> 31229558

Comparing 3D Genome Organization in Multiple Species Using Phylo-HMRF.

Yang Yang1, Yang Zhang1, Bing Ren2, Jesse R Dixon3, Jian Ma4.   

Abstract

Recent whole-genome mapping approaches for the chromatin interactome have offered new insights into 3D genome organization. However, our knowledge of the evolutionary patterns of 3D genome in mammals remains limited. In particular, there are no existing phylogenetic-model-based methods to analyze chromatin interactions as continuous features. Here, we develop phylogenetic hidden Markov random field (Phylo-HMRF) to identify evolutionary patterns of 3D genome based on multi-species Hi-C data by jointly utilizing spatial constraints among genomic loci and continuous-trait evolutionary models. We used Phylo-HMRF to uncover cross-species 3D genome patterns based on Hi-C data from the same cell type in four primate species (human, chimpanzee, bonobo, and gorilla). The identified evolutionary patterns of 3D genome correlate with features of genome structure and function. This work provides a new framework to analyze multi-species continuous genomic features with spatial constraints and has the potential to help reveal the evolutionary principles of 3D genome organization.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D genome organization; comparative genomics; phylogenetic hidden Markov random field

Year:  2019        PMID: 31229558      PMCID: PMC6706282          DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   10.304


  41 in total

1.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Authors:  Y Zhang; M Brady; S Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  On clustering fMRI time series.

Authors:  C Goutte; P Toft; E Rostrup; F Nielsen; L K Hansen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A structural EM algorithm for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Nir Friedman; Matan Ninio; Itsik Pe'er; Tal Pupko
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts?

Authors:  Vladimir Kolmogorov; Ramin Zabih
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution.

Authors:  M Pagel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision.

Authors:  Yuri Boykov; Vladimir Kolmogorov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  The mean field theory in EM procedures for blind Markov random field image restoration.

Authors:  J Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.856

8.  Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome.

Authors:  Jian Ma; Louxin Zhang; Bernard B Suh; Brian J Raney; Richard C Burhans; W James Kent; Mathieu Blanchette; David Haussler; Webb Miller
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Inactivation of CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase occurred prior to brain expansion during human evolution.

Authors:  Hsun-Hua Chou; Toshiyuki Hayakawa; Sandra Diaz; Matthias Krings; Etty Indriati; Meave Leakey; Svante Paabo; Yoko Satta; Naoyuki Takahata; Ajit Varki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006.

Authors:  A S Hinrichs; D Karolchik; R Baertsch; G P Barber; G Bejerano; H Clawson; M Diekhans; T S Furey; R A Harte; F Hsu; J Hillman-Jackson; R M Kuhn; J S Pedersen; A Pohl; B J Raney; K R Rosenbloom; A Siepel; K E Smith; C W Sugnet; A Sultan-Qurraie; D J Thomas; H Trumbower; R J Weber; M Weirauch; A S Zweig; D Haussler; W J Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  12 in total

1.  Topologically associating domain boundaries that are stable across diverse cell types are evolutionarily constrained and enriched for heritability.

Authors:  Evonne McArthur; John A Capra
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  EpiAlignment: alignment with both DNA sequence and epigenomic data.

Authors:  Jia Lu; Xiaoyi Cao; Sheng Zhong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  A TAD Skeptic: Is 3D Genome Topology Conserved?

Authors:  Ittai E Eres; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  GRiNCH: simultaneous smoothing and detection of topological units of genome organization from sparse chromatin contact count matrices with matrix factorization.

Authors:  Da-Inn Lee; Sushmita Roy
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Conservation of chromatin conformation in carnivores.

Authors:  Marco Corbo; Joana Damas; Madeline G Bursell; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Multi-species annotation of transcriptome and chromatin structure in domesticated animals.

Authors:  Sylvain Foissac; Sarah Djebali; Kylie Munyard; Nathalie Vialaneix; Andrea Rau; Kevin Muret; Diane Esquerré; Matthias Zytnicki; Thomas Derrien; Philippe Bardou; Fany Blanc; Cédric Cabau; Elisa Crisci; Sophie Dhorne-Pollet; Françoise Drouet; Thomas Faraut; Ignacio Gonzalez; Adeline Goubil; Sonia Lacroix-Lamandé; Fabrice Laurent; Sylvain Marthey; Maria Marti-Marimon; Raphaelle Momal-Leisenring; Florence Mompart; Pascale Quéré; David Robelin; Magali San Cristobal; Gwenola Tosser-Klopp; Silvia Vincent-Naulleau; Stéphane Fabre; Marie-Hélène Pinard-Van der Laan; Christophe Klopp; Michèle Tixier-Boichard; Hervé Acloque; Sandrine Lagarrigue; Elisabetta Giuffra
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  CHESS enables quantitative comparison of chromatin contact data and automatic feature extraction.

Authors:  Silvia Galan; Nick Machnik; Kai Kruse; Noelia Díaz; Marc A Marti-Renom; Juan M Vaquerizas
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 41.307

8.  A comparative analysis of chromatin accessibility in cattle, pig, and mouse tissues.

Authors:  Michelle M Halstead; Colin Kern; Perot Saelao; Ying Wang; Ganrea Chanthavixay; Juan F Medrano; Alison L Van Eenennaam; Ian Korf; Christopher K Tuggle; Catherine W Ernst; Huaijun Zhou; Pablo J Ross
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Topologically associating domains and their role in the evolution of genome structure and function in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yi Liao; Xinwen Zhang; Mahul Chakraborty; J J Emerson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Functional Similarities of Protein-Coding Genes in Topologically Associating Domains and Spatially-Proximate Genomic Regions.

Authors:  Chenguang Zhao; Tong Liu; Zheng Wang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.