Literature DB >> 3467538

Factors restricting the use of coma scales.

D J Price.   

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale has been well established as the ideal scale for identifying specific levels of consciousness. It is widely used to provide a consistent entry criterion for series of head injuries under study, to create arbitrary thresholds for management decisions and as an important component of the data-set for comparative studies of patients in different centres with specified treatment regimes. Its international reputation for application to these 3 functions is well deserved but the dangers of summing the subscores have been rightly emphasized by the designers. Any further improvements may only cause confusion and it will undoubtedly continue as the recognized standard for many years. Unfortunately, this scale is very inadequate for monitoring head injured patients at risk of deterioration as it is insufficiently sensitive. The prompt recognition of the first signs of deteriorating consciousness is of paramount importance. A more sensitive scale encompassing more aspects of the response of the patient to the environment is required. For this purpose of trend detection, subscore summation is acceptable and nurses find a single graph easier to interpret.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3467538     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8859-0_29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A multicentre study on the reaction level scale (RLS 85).

Authors:  D Stålhammar; J E Starmark; E Holmgren; N Eriksson; C H Nordström; O Fedders; B Rosander
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines.

Authors:  J E Starmark; D Stålhammar; E Holmgren
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  A comparative study of the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Edinburgh-2 Coma Scale (modified) (E2CS(M)).

Authors:  J Tesseris; N Pantazidis; C Routsi; D Fragoulakis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  [Prognostic value of routine parameters and laboratory parameters after major trauma. A prospective preclinical-clinical study of air rescue patients].

Authors:  C K Lackner; K Burghofer; E Stolpe; T Schlechtriemen; W E Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.