Literature DB >> 32115435

Robotic assisted carotid artery stenting for the treatment of symptomatic carotid disease: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

Raul G Nogueira1,2, Rajesh Sachdeva2,3, Alhamza R Al-Bayati4,2, Mahmoud H Mohammaden4,2, Michael R Frankel4,2, Diogo C Haussen4,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted endovascular interventions have been increasingly performed in the coronary and peripheral vascular beds. We aim to describe the feasibility and initial safety of a robotic-assisted platform for treating carotid artery disease.
METHODS: Single-center technical report of the first four consecutive cases of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of severe symptomatic carotid stenosis utilizing the CorPath GRX Robotic System (Corindus Inc, Waltham, MA).
RESULTS: Four patients (one in early 60s and three in early 70s; NASCET degree of stenosis: 88%, 77%, 83% and 82%) with ipsilateral strokes on presentation were treated. All steps of the procedure (including delivery/removal of micro-guidewire, emboli-protection system and angioplasty balloon) could be successfully performed robotically with the exception of navigation/deployment of the stents due to incompatibility with the current robotic platform. Technical success was achieved in all patients resulting in resolution of the stenosis without any complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting is technically feasible. Future studies are warranted to properly establish safety and benefits. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  stenosis; stent; stroke; technique

Year:  2020        PMID: 32115435     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  8 in total

1.  Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer.

Authors:  Kazim H Narsinh; Ricardo Paez; Kerstin Mueller; M Travis Caton; Amanda Baker; Randall T Higashida; Van V Halbach; Christopher F Dowd; Matthew R Amans; Steven W Hetts; Alexander M Norbash; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 2.  A Review of Robotic Interventional Neuroradiology.

Authors:  C B Beaman; N Kaneko; P M Meyers; S Tateshima
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.966

Review 3.  [Remote proctoring in neuroradiological interventions].

Authors:  M Bechstein; E Goebell; J Fiehler
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Endovascular Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Javier Bravo; Arvin R Wali; Brian R Hirshman; Tilvawala Gopesh; Jeffrey A Steinberg; Bernard Yan; J Scott Pannell; Alexander Norbash; James Friend; Alexander A Khalessi; David Santiago-Dieppa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 5.  Robot-assisted techniques in vascular and endovascular surgery.

Authors:  A Püschel; C Schafmayer; J Groß
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Robotics in neurointerventional surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  William Crinnion; Ben Jackson; Avnish Sood; Jeremy Lynch; Christos Bergeles; Hongbin Liu; Kawal Rhode; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Thomas C Booth
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.572

7.  Neurointervention in the 2020s: Where are We Going?

Authors:  Mayank Goyal; Wim van Zwam; Jacques Moret; Johanna Maria Ospel
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Remote Surgery Using a Neuroendovascular Intervention Support Robot Equipped with a Sensing Function: Experimental Verification.

Authors:  Shigeru Miyachi; Yoshitaka Nagano; Reo Kawaguchi; Tomotaka Ohshima; Hiroki Tadauchi
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-05-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.