Literature DB >> 33540785

Women's Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada.

Cynthia Mbuya Bienge1,2, Nora Pashayan3, Jennifer D Brooks4, Michel Dorval1,5,6, Jocelyne Chiquette1,7,8, Laurence Eloy9, Annie Turgeon1, Laurence Lambert-Côté1, Jean-Sébastien Paquette8, Emmanuelle Lévesque10, Julie Hagan10, Meghan J Walker4,11, Julie Lapointe1, Gratien Dalpé10, Palmira Granados Granados Moreno10, Kristina Blackmore11, Michael Wolfson12, Yann Joly10, Mireille Broeders13,14, Bartha M Knoppers10, Anna M Chiarelli4,11, Jacques Simard1,15, Hermann Nabi1,2,16.   

Abstract

Risk-stratified screening for breast cancer (BC) is increasingly considered as a promising approach. However, its implementation is challenging and needs to be acceptable to women. We examined Canadian women's attitudes towards, comfort level about, and willingness to take part in BC risk-stratified screening. We conducted an online survey in women aged 30 to 69 years in four Canadian provinces. In total, 4293 women completed the questionnaire (response rate of 63%). The majority of women (63.5% to 72.8%) expressed favorable attitudes towards BC risk-stratified screening. Most women reported that they would be comfortable providing personal and genetic information for BC risk assessment (61.5% to 67.4%) and showed a willingness to have their BC risk assessed if offered (74.8%). Most women (85.9%) would also accept an increase in screening frequency if they were at higher risk, but fewer (49.3%) would accept a reduction in screening frequency if they were at lower risk. There were few differences by province; however, outcomes varied by age, education level, marital status, income, perceived risk, history of BC, prior mammography, and history of genetic test for BC (all p ≤ 0.01). Risk-based BC screening using multifactorial risk assessment appears to be acceptable to most women. This suggests that the implementation of this approach is likely to be well-supported by Canadian women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; population survey; precision prevention; risk-stratified screening; women’s per-spectives

Year:  2021        PMID: 33540785      PMCID: PMC7912955          DOI: 10.3390/jpm11020095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Med        ISSN: 2075-4426


  27 in total

Review 1.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  A response to "Personalised medicine and population health: breast and ovarian cancer".

Authors:  Antonis Antoniou; Hoda Anton-Culver; Alexander Borowsky; Mireille Broeders; Jennifer Brooks; Anna Chiarelli; Jocelyne Chiquette; Jack Cuzick; Suzette Delaloge; Peter Devilee; Michael Dorval; Douglas Easton; Andrea Eisen; Martin Eklund; Laurence Eloy; Laura Esserman; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; David Goldgar; Per Hall; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Peter Kraft; Andrea La Croix; Lisa Madalensky; Nasim Mavaddat; Nicole Mittman; Hermann Nabi; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Nora Pashayan; Marjanka Schmidt; Yiwey Shieh; Jacques Simard; Allison Stover-Fiscallini; Jeffrey A Tice; Laura Van't Veer; Neil Wenger; Michael Wolfson; Christina Yau; Elad Ziv
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Breast Cancer Screening in the Precision Medicine Era: Risk-Based Screening in a Population-Based Trial.

Authors:  Yiwey Shieh; Martin Eklund; Lisa Madlensky; Sarah D Sawyer; Carlie K Thompson; Allison Stover Fiscalini; Elad Ziv; Laura J Van't Veer; Laura J Esserman; Jeffrey A Tice
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  "A Natural Progression": Australian Women's Attitudes About an Individualized Breast Screening Model.

Authors:  Jocelyn Lippey; Louise A Keogh; G Bruce Mann; Ian G Campbell; Laura E Forrest
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-04-19

5.  Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women: trends from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Jaeyoung Kim; Soong Nang Jang
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2008-05

6.  Adjusting the frequency of mammography screening on the basis of genetic risk: Attitudes among women in the UK.

Authors:  Susanne F Meisel; Nora Pashayan; Belinda Rahman; Lucy Side; Lindsay Fraser; Sue Gessler; Anne Lanceley; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 7.  The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-09-13

8.  Women's interest in a personal breast cancer risk assessment and lifestyle advice at NHS mammography screening.

Authors:  B A Fisher; L Wilkinson; A Valencia
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.341

9.  Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Linda Rainey; Daniëlle van der Waal; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Population-Based Precision Cancer Screening: A Symposium on Evidence, Epidemiology, and Next Steps.

Authors:  Pamela M Marcus; Nora Pashayan; Timothy R Church; V Paul Doria-Rose; Michael K Gould; Rebecca A Hubbard; Michael Marrone; Diana L Miglioretti; Paul D Pharoah; Paul F Pinsky; Katherine A Rendle; Hilary A Robbins; Megan C Roberts; Betsy Rolland; Mark Schiffman; Jasmin A Tiro; Ann G Zauber; Deborah M Winn; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  4 in total

1.  A community jury study exploring the public acceptability of using risk stratification to determine eligibility for cancer screening.

Authors:  Rebecca A Dennison; Rachel A Boscott; Rae Thomas; Simon J Griffin; Hannah Harrison; Stephen D John; Sowmiya A Moorthie; Stephen Morris; Sabrina H Rossi; Grant D Stewart; Chloe V Thomas; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 2.  Gynecologic Cancer Risk and Genetics: Informing an Ideal Model of Gynecologic Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Lauren C Tindale; Almira Zhantuyakova; Stephanie Lam; Michelle Woo; Janice S Kwon; Gillian E Hanley; Bartha Knoppers; Kasmintan A Schrader; Stuart J Peacock; Aline Talhouk; Trevor Dummer; Kelly Metcalfe; Nora Pashayan; William D Foulkes; Ranjit Manchanda; David Huntsman; Gavin Stuart; Jacques Simard; Lesa Dawson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Personalized Approaches for the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hermann Nabi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-23

4.  Implementing Risk-Stratified Breast Screening in England: An Agenda Setting Meeting.

Authors:  Lorna McWilliams; D Gareth Evans; Katherine Payne; Fiona Harrison; Anthony Howell; Sacha J Howell; David P French
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 6.575

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.