Literature DB >> 31003994

"A Natural Progression": Australian Women's Attitudes About an Individualized Breast Screening Model.

Jocelyn Lippey1,2, Louise A Keogh3, G Bruce Mann4,5, Ian G Campbell6,7, Laura E Forrest6,8.   

Abstract

Individualized screening is our logical next step to improve population breast cancer screening in Australia. To explore breast screening participants' views of the current program in Victoria, Australia, examine their openness to change, and attitudes toward an individualized screening model, this qualitative work was performed from a population-based breast screening cohort. This work was designed to inform the development of a decision aid to facilitate women's decisions about participating in individualized screening, and to elicit Australian consumer perspectives on the international movement toward individualized breast screening. A total of 52 women participated in one of four focus groups, and were experienced with screening with 90% of participants having had more than three mammograms. Focus group discussion was facilitated following three main themes: (i) experience of breast screening; (ii) breast cancer risk perception, and (iii) views on individualized screening. Participants had strong, positive, emotional ties to breast screening in its current structure but were supportive, with some reservations, of the idea of individualized screening. There was good understanding about the factors contributing to personalized risk and a wide range of opinions about the inclusion of genetic testing with genetic testing being considered a foreign and evolving domain. Individualized breast screening that takes account of risk factors such as mammographic density, lifestyle, and genetic factors would be acceptable to a population of women who are invested in the current system. The communication and implementation of a new program would be critical to its acceptance and potential success. Reservations may be had in regards to uptake of genetic testing, motivations behind the change, and management of the women allocated to a lower risk category. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31003994     DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  7 in total

1.  Female Healthcare Workers' Knowledge, Attitude towards Breast Cancer, and Perceived Barriers towards Mammogram Screening: A Multicenter Study in North Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Anfal Mohammed Alenezi; Ashokkumar Thirunavukkarasu; Farooq Ahmed Wani; Hadil Alenezi; Muhannad Faleh Alanazi; Abdulaziz Saud Alruwaili; Rasha Harbi Alashjaee; Faisal Harbi Alashjaee; Abdulaziz Khalid Alrasheed; Bandar Dhaher Alshrari
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Development and pilot testing of an online decision aid for women considering risk-stratified breast screening.

Authors:  Jocelyn Lippey; Louise Keogh; Ian Campbell; Gregory Bruce Mann; Laura Forrest
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-21

3.  Implementation considerations for offering personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; Gillian Reyes-Marcelino; Louise Keogh; Kate Dunlop; Ainsley J Newson; Anne E Cust
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Women's Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada.

Authors:  Cynthia Mbuya Bienge; Nora Pashayan; Jennifer D Brooks; Michel Dorval; Jocelyne Chiquette; Laurence Eloy; Annie Turgeon; Laurence Lambert-Côté; Jean-Sébastien Paquette; Emmanuelle Lévesque; Julie Hagan; Meghan J Walker; Julie Lapointe; Gratien Dalpé; Palmira Granados Granados Moreno; Kristina Blackmore; Michael Wolfson; Yann Joly; Mireille Broeders; Bartha M Knoppers; Anna M Chiarelli; Jacques Simard; Hermann Nabi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-02-02

Review 5.  Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Federica Vallone; Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Francesco Palumbo; Elvira Lorenzo; Angelo D'Argenzio; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  The Relationship between Healthcare Providers and Preventive Practices: Narratives on Access to Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Development and validation of the MARA scale in Spanish to assess knowledge and perceived risks and barriers relating to breast cancer prevention.

Authors:  Andrea Martínez-Urquijo; Álvaro Postigo; Marcelino Cuesta; María Del Mar Fernández-Álvarez; Rubén Martín-Payo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.506

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.