Literature DB >> 33538920

The role of point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion: a single academic center retrospective study.

Matthew G Hanson1, Barry Chan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic pericardial effusion (PCE) presents with non-specific features and are often missed on the initial physical exam, chest X-ray (CXR), and electrocardiogram (ECG). In extreme cases, misdiagnosis can evolve into decompensated cardiac tamponade, a life-threatening obstructive shock. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) on the diagnosis and therapeutic intervention of clinically significant PCE.
METHODS: In a retrospective chart review, we looked at all patients between 2002 and 2018 at a major Canadian academic hospital who had a pericardiocentesis for clinically significant PCE. We extracted the rate of presenting complaints, physical exam findings, X-ray findings, ECG findings, time-to-diagnosis, and time-to-pericardiocentesis and how these were impacted by POCUS.
RESULTS: The most common presenting symptom was dyspnea (64%) and the average systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 120 mmHg. 86% of people presenting had an effusion > 1 cm, and 89% were circumferential on departmental echocardiogram (ECHO) with 64% having evidence of right atrial systolic collapse and 58% with early diastolic right ventricular collapse. The average time-to-diagnosis with POCUS was 5.9 h compared to > 12 h with other imaging including departmental ECHO. Those who had the PCE identified by POCUS had an average time-to-pericardiocentesis of 28.1 h compared to > 48 h with other diagnostic modalities.
CONCLUSION: POCUS expedites the diagnosis of symptomatic PCE given its non-specific clinical findings which, in turn, may accelerate the time-to-intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Pericardial effusion; Point-of-care ultrasound

Year:  2021        PMID: 33538920      PMCID: PMC7862446          DOI: 10.1186/s13089-021-00205-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound J        ISSN: 2524-8987


  23 in total

Review 1.  Misconceptions and facts about pericardial effusion and tamponade.

Authors:  Edgar Argulian; Franz Messerli
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Role of a 12-lead electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade as diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography in patients with malignant pericardial effusion.

Authors:  Rahul G Argula; Smita I Negi; Jose Banchs; Syed Wamique Yusuf
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  The current state of ultrasound training in canadian emergency medicine programs: perspectives from program directors.

Authors:  Daniel J Kim; Jonathan Theoret; Michael M Liao; Emily Hopkins; Karen Woolfrey; John L Kendall
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Pericardial Effusions: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Sneha Vakamudi; Natalie Ho; Paul C Cremer
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 8.194

5.  Canadian recommendations for critical care ultrasound training and competency.

Authors:  Robert Arntfield; Scott Millington; Craig Ainsworth; Rakesh Arora; John Boyd; Gordon Finlayson; William Gallagher; Colin Gebhardt; Alberto Goffi; Edgar Hockman; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Robert McDermid; Jason Waechter; Natalie Wong; Samara Zavalkoff; Yanick Beaulieu
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.409

6.  Hypotension is uncommon in patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic cardiac tamponade.

Authors:  Tushar Kapoor; Michael Locurto; Gino A Farina; Robert Silverman
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 7.  Update on bedside ultrasound diagnosis of pericardial effusion.

Authors:  Elisa Ceriani; Chiara Cogliati
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Pericardial effusion impending tamponade: a look beyond Beck's triad.

Authors:  Sony Jacob; Justin C Sebastian; Prasad K Cherian; Aril Abraham; Sinoj K John
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Implications of echocardiographically assisted diagnosis of pericardial tamponade in contemporary medical patients: detection before hemodynamic embarrassment.

Authors:  M J Levine; B H Lorell; D J Diver; P C Come
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Emergency department point-of-care ultrasonography improves time to pericardiocentesis for clinically significant effusions.

Authors:  Evan Avraham Alpert; Uri Amit; Larisa Guranda; Rafea Mahagna; Shamai A Grossman; Ariel Bentancur
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Pericardial Effusion Identified by Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Pediatric Patient with Covid-19.

Authors:  Michael Danta; Jessica Zerzan
Journal:  Vis J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction by single echocardiographic view: towards an evidence-based point of care cardiac ultrasound scanning protocol.

Authors:  Christina Luong; Shekoofeh Saboktakin Rizi; Kenneth Gin; John Jue; Darwin F Yeung; Michael Y C Tsang; Eric C Sayre; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Cardiac Tamponade: A Case for Point-of-Care Ultrasound.

Authors:  Ronald H Wharton; Steven A Greenstein
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2022-08-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.