Literature DB >> 25694103

Role of a 12-lead electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade as diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography in patients with malignant pericardial effusion.

Rahul G Argula1, Smita I Negi, Jose Banchs, Syed Wamique Yusuf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have looked at the utility of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in diagnosing cardiac tamponade in malignant pericardial effusion (PE). The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 12-lead ECG in diagnosing cardiac tamponade in PE. HYPOTHESIS: Abnormalities on a 12 lead ECG can be used to diagnose or exclude cardiac tamponade in patients with malignant PE.
METHODS: Using echocardiography as the gold standard for diagnosis of cardiac tamponade, we determined the Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV for individual and combinations of the 3 ECG abnormalities (low-voltage complexes, electrical alternans, and sinus tachycardia).
RESULTS: For PEs of all sizes, the Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV for detecting cardiac tamponade were: low-voltage complexes (56%, 74%, 81%, 46%), electrical alternans (23%, 98%, 95%, 39%), and sinus tachycardia (76%, 60%, 79%, 56%), respectively. Presence of all 3 and any of the 3 ECG abnormalities had a Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV of 8%, 100%, 100%, 36% and 89%, 47%, 77%, 69%, respectively, for cardiac tamponade. The odds ratios for cardiac tamponade in PE were 3.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65-8.30) for low-voltage complexes, 12.3 (95% CI: 1.58-95.17) for electrical alternans, and 4.9 (95% CI: 2.22-10.80) for sinus tachycardia. Presence of any of 3 ECG abnormalities had an odds ratio of 7.3 (95% CI: 2.9-18.1) for cardiac tamponade.
CONCLUSIONS: In malignant PE, combination of ECG abnormalities can supplement clinical examination in the diagnosis of echocardiographic cardiac tamponade. Due to its low NPV, 12-lead ECG cannot be used as a screening tool to exclude cardiac tamponade with malignant PE.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25694103      PMCID: PMC6711093          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  5 in total

1.  Clinical and historical features of emergency department patients with pericardial effusions.

Authors:  Lori Stolz; Josephine Valenzuela; Elaine Situ-LaCasse; Uwe Stolz; Nicolas Hawbaker; Matthew Thompson; Srikar Adhikari
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2017

2.  Swinging heart caused by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Raúl A Montañez-Valverde; Neal Ivan Olarte; Gerardo Zablah; David Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Rosario Colombo
Journal:  Oxf Med Case Reports       Date:  2018-08-25

3.  The role of point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion: a single academic center retrospective study.

Authors:  Matthew G Hanson; Barry Chan
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Prognosis and role of clinical and imaging features in patients with malignant pericardial effusion: a single-center study in China.

Authors:  Shucai Wang; Jiazheng Zhao; Chanchan Wang; Ning Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy For Penetrating Cardiac Box Injury in Stable Patients.

Authors:  Eric E Vinck; Eduardo Posada Ángel; Rodolfo V Barrios; Stella I Martínez; Carlos A Arias; Juan C Garzón; Tjark Ebels; Sergio A Alzate; Alexander Fernández
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-08-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.