Literature DB >> 33537665

Scalpel edge roughness affects post-transection peripheral nerve regeneration.

Hannes Prescher1, Michelle X Ling1, Victoria Bigdelle1, Clifford L Spiro1, Raphael C Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gentle and precise tissue dissection reduces collateral tissue damage and preserves its structural quality for optimizing healing. This is particularly true for peripheral nerve neurorrhaphy. Axon regeneration kinetics across the repair is dependent on the amount of intraneural fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether scalpel blade smoothness was a deterministic factor in the kinetics of postneurorrhaphy peripheral axon regeneration.
METHODS: Scalpel transection of the saphenous nerve was performed in 18 female Hartley guinea pigs either by a standard #15 stainless steel scalpel blade or a highly polished version of the same blade. Compound nerve action potential recordings and histochemical assay of neurofilament density proximal and 1 cm distal to the site of nerve transection were quantified postneurorrhaphy at postoperative weeks 5, 9, and 12.
RESULTS: There was no action potential transmission observed in the distal axons immediately after neurorrhaphy. A substantial acceleration of axonal conduction recovery was observed in nerves transected with polished scalpel blades observed by high compound nerve action potential amplitudes at postneurorrhaphy weeks 5 and 9 (P < .05). In addition, an increased recovery of intra-axonal neurofilament density in nerves transected with polished scalpel blades was observed by postoperative week 5 (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: The quality of the scalpel blade is an important determinate of postsurgical healing. Gentle handling of tissue matters.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33537665      PMCID: PMC7838729          DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2020.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Open Sci        ISSN: 2589-8450


  27 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and treatment of excessive dermal scarring.

Authors:  Ingrid E Roseborough; Mark A Grevious; Raphael C Lee
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Etiology of lingual nerve injuries in the third molar region: a cadaver and histologic study.

Authors:  M Anthony Pogrel; Hung Le
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 3.  The basic science of wound healing.

Authors:  George Broughton; Jeffrey E Janis; Christopher E Attinger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Scarring impedes regeneration at sites of peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Simon Atkins; Keith G Smith; Alison R Loescher; Fiona M Boissonade; Sharon O'Kane; Mark W J Ferguson; Peter P Robinson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 5.  Scar less: a review of methods of scar reduction at sites of peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Wei Cheong Ngeow
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-03

6.  Proximal and distal changes in collagen content of peripheral nerve that follow transection and crush lesions.

Authors:  T F Eather; M Pollock; D B Myers
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 7.  Upper-extremity peripheral nerve injuries: a Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center literature review with comparison of the operative outcomes of 1837 Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center median, radial, and ulnar nerve lesions.

Authors:  Judith A Murovic
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Nerve physiology: mechanisms of injury and recovery.

Authors:  Ron M G Menorca; Theron S Fussell; John C Elfar
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.907

9.  Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca L E Dunlop; Justin Conrad Rosen Wormald; Abhilash Jain
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries.

Authors:  Bo He; Zhaowei Zhu; Qingtang Zhu; Xiang Zhou; Canbin Zheng; Pengliang Li; Shuang Zhu; Xiaolin Liu; Jiakai Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.