Literature DB >> 33536309

Rhythmic auditory stimuli modulate movement recovery in response to perturbation during locomotion.

Deepak K Ravi1, Marc Bartholet1, Andreas Skiadopoulos2, Jenny A Kent2, Jordan Wickstrom2, William R Taylor1, Navrag B Singh1, Nick Stergiou3,4.   

Abstract

The capacity to recover after a perturbation is a well-known intrinsic property of physiological systems, including the locomotor system, and can be termed 'resilience'. Despite an abundance of metrics proposed to measure the complex dynamics of bipedal locomotion, analytical tools for quantifying resilience are lacking. Here, we introduce a novel method to directly quantify resilience to perturbations during locomotion. We examined the extent to which synchronizing stepping with two different temporal structured auditory stimuli (periodic and 1/f structure) during walking modulates resilience to a large unexpected perturbation. Recovery time after perturbation was calculated from the horizontal velocity of the body's center of mass. Our results indicate that synchronizing stepping with a 1/f stimulus elicited greater resilience to mechanical perturbations during walking compared with the periodic stimulus (3.3 s faster). Our proposed method may help to gain a comprehensive understanding of movement recovery behavior of humans and other animals in their ecological contexts.
© 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1/f structure; Adaptive capacity; Aging; Non-linear dynamics; Physiological resilience; Recovery potential

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536309      PMCID: PMC7938806          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.237073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  54 in total

1.  Balance responses to lateral perturbations in human treadmill walking.

Authors:  A L Hof; S M Vermerris; W A Gjaltema
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The 'extrapolated center of mass' concept suggests a simple control of balance in walking.

Authors:  At L Hof
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 3.  Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  When Coordinating Finger Tapping to a Variable Beat the Variability Scaling Structure of the Movement and the Cortical BOLD Signal are Both Entrained to the Auditory Stimuli.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Michael Hough; Kendra Schmid; Boman R Groff; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 5.  Assessing the stability of human locomotion: a review of current measures.

Authors:  S M Bruijn; O G Meijer; P J Beek; J H van Dieën
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Physiology in fractal dimensions: error tolerance.

Authors:  B J West
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Center of mass velocity-based predictions in balance recovery following pelvis perturbations during human walking.

Authors:  M Vlutters; E H F van Asseldonk; H van der Kooij
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Report: NIA Workshop on Measures of Physiologic Resiliencies in Human Aging.

Authors:  Evan C Hadley; George A Kuchel; Anne B Newman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Novel methodology for assessing total recovery time in response to unexpected perturbations while walking.

Authors:  Uri Rosenblum; Lotem Kribus-Shmiel; Gabi Zeilig; Yotam Bahat; Shani Kimel-Naor; Itshak Melzer; Meir Plotnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.