Literature DB >> 26994171

Center of mass velocity-based predictions in balance recovery following pelvis perturbations during human walking.

M Vlutters1, E H F van Asseldonk2, H van der Kooij3.   

Abstract

In many simple walking models, foot placement dictates the center of pressure location and ground reaction force components, whereas humans can modulate these aspects after foot contact. Because of the differences, it is unclear to what extent predictions made by models are valid for human walking. Yet, both model simulations and human experimental data have previously indicated that the center of mass (COM) velocity plays an important role in regulating stable walking. Here, perturbed human walking was studied to determine the relationship of the horizontal COM velocity at heel strike and toe-off with the foot placement location relative to the COM, the forthcoming center of pressure location relative to the COM, and the ground reaction forces. Ten healthy subjects received mediolateral and anteroposterior pelvis perturbations of various magnitudes at toe-off, during 0.63 and 1.25 m s(-1) treadmill walking. At heel strike after the perturbation, recovery from mediolateral perturbations involved mediolateral foot placement adjustments proportional to the mediolateral COM velocity. In contrast, for anteroposterior perturbations, no significant anteroposterior foot placement adjustment occurred at this heel strike. However, in both directions the COM velocity at heel strike related linearly to the center of pressure location at the subsequent toe-off. This relationship was affected by the walking speed and was, for the slow speed, in line with a COM velocity-based control strategy previously applied by others in a linear inverted pendulum model. Finally, changes in gait phase durations suggest that the timing of actions could play an important role during the perturbation recovery.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capture point; Extrapolated center of mass; Foot placement; Human balance; Perturbed walking

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994171     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.129338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  38 in total

1.  The recovery response to a novel unannounced laboratory-induced slip: The "first trial effect" in older adults.

Authors:  Xuan Liu; Sasha Reschechtko; Shuaijie Wang; Yi-Chung Clive Pai
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Relationship between margin of stability and deviations in spatiotemporal gait features in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Shajicaa Sivakumaran; Alison Schinkel-Ivy; Kei Masani; Avril Mansfield
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Inertial Sensor-Based Centripetal Acceleration as a Correlate for Lateral Margin of Stability During Walking and Turning.

Authors:  Peter C Fino; Fay B Horak; Carolin Curtze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  A controller for walking derived from how humans recover from perturbations.

Authors:  Varun Joshi; Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Viability, task switching, and fall avoidance of the simplest dynamic walker.

Authors:  Navendu S Patil; Jonathan B Dingwell; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Maintaining sagittal plane balance compromises frontal plane balance during reactive stepping in people post-stroke.

Authors:  Tom J W Buurke; Chang Liu; Sungwoo Park; Rob den Otter; James M Finley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Stepping onto the unknown: reflexes of the foot and ankle while stepping with perturbed perceptions of terrain.

Authors:  R C Riddick; D J Farris; A G Cresswell; A D Kuo; L A Kelly
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Robot-supported assessment of balance in standing and walking.

Authors:  Camila Shirota; Edwin van Asseldonk; Zlatko Matjačić; Heike Vallery; Pierre Barralon; Serena Maggioni; Jaap H Buurke; Jan F Veneman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Similar sensorimotor transformations control balance during standing and walking.

Authors:  Maarten Afschrift; Friedl De Groote; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Paretic versus non-paretic stepping responses following pelvis perturbations in walking chronic-stage stroke survivors.

Authors:  Juliet A M Haarman; Mark Vlutters; Richelle A C M Olde Keizer; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Jaap H Buurke; Jasper Reenalda; Johan S Rietman; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.