Literature DB >> 33536030

Data analytics and clinical feature ranking of medical records of patients with sepsis.

Davide Chicco1, Luca Oneto2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening clinical condition that happens when the patient's body has an excessive reaction to an infection, and should be treated in one hour. Due to the urgency of sepsis, doctors and physicians often do not have enough time to perform laboratory tests and analyses to help them forecast the consequences of the sepsis episode. In this context, machine learning can provide a fast computational prediction of sepsis severity, patient survival, and sequential organ failure by just analyzing the electronic health records of the patients. Also, machine learning can be employed to understand which features in the medical records are more predictive of sepsis severity, of patient survival, and of sequential organ failure in a fast and non-invasive way. DATASET AND METHODS: In this study, we analyzed a dataset of electronic health records of 364 patients collected between 2014 and 2016. The medical record of each patient has 29 clinical features, and includes a binary value for survival, a binary value for septic shock, and a numerical value for the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. We disjointly utilized each of these three factors as an independent target, and employed several machine learning methods to predict it (binary classifiers for survival and septic shock, and regression analysis for the SOFA score). Afterwards, we used a data mining approach to identify the most important dataset features in relation to each of the three targets separately, and compared these results with the results achieved through a standard biostatistics approach. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that machine learning can be employed efficiently to predict septic shock, SOFA score, and survival of patients diagnoses with sepsis, from their electronic health records data. And regarding clinical feature ranking, our results showed that Random Forests feature selection identified several unexpected symptoms and clinical components as relevant for septic shock, SOFA score, and survival. These discoveries can help doctors and physicians in understanding and predicting septic shock. We made the analyzed dataset and our developed software code publicly available online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binary classification; Data analytics; Data science; Feature ranking; Machine learning; Regression analysis; SOFA; Sepsis; Septic severity; Septic shock; Sequential organ failure assessment; Survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536030     DOI: 10.1186/s13040-021-00235-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioData Min        ISSN: 1756-0381            Impact factor:   2.522


  19 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective.

Authors:  I Kononenko
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  PhysioNet: a Web-based resource for the study of physiologic signals.

Authors:  G B Moody; R G Mark; A L Goldberger
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  The precision--recall curve overcame the optimism of the receiver operating characteristic curve in rare diseases.

Authors:  Brice Ozenne; Fabien Subtil; Delphine Maucort-Boulch
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs.

Authors:  Christopher Barton; Uli Chettipally; Yifan Zhou; Zirui Jiang; Anna Lynn-Palevsky; Sidney Le; Jacob Calvert; Ritankar Das
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: a machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Eren Gultepe; Jeffrey P Green; Hien Nguyen; Jason Adams; Timothy Albertson; Ilias Tagkopoulos
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Medical decision support using machine learning for early detection of late-onset neonatal sepsis.

Authors:  Subramani Mani; Asli Ozdas; Constantin Aliferis; Huseyin Atakan Varol; Qingxia Chen; Randy Carnevale; Yukun Chen; Joann Romano-Keeler; Hui Nian; Jörn-Hendrik Weitkamp
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  R Andrew Taylor; Joseph R Pare; Arjun K Venkatesh; Hani Mowafi; Edward R Melnick; William Fleischman; M Kennedy Hall
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Artificial neural network classifier predicts neuroblastoma patients' outcome.

Authors:  Davide Cangelosi; Simone Pelassa; Martina Morini; Massimo Conte; Maria Carla Bosco; Alessandra Eva; Angela Rita Sementa; Luigi Varesio
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Using Resistin, glucose, age and BMI to predict the presence of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Patrício; José Pereira; Joana Crisóstomo; Paulo Matafome; Manuel Gomes; Raquel Seiça; Francisco Caramelo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.

Authors:  Alistair E W Johnson; Tom J Pollard; Lu Shen; Li-Wei H Lehman; Mengling Feng; Mohammad Ghassemi; Benjamin Moody; Peter Szolovits; Leo Anthony Celi; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.444

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prognostic tools for elderly patients with sepsis: in search of new predictive models.

Authors:  Fernando-Miguel Gamboa-Antiñolo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  The impact of recency and adequacy of historical information on sepsis predictions using machine learning.

Authors:  Manaf Zargoush; Alireza Sameh; Mahdi Javadi; Siyavash Shabani; Somayeh Ghazalbash; Dan Perri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.