BACKGROUND: Acute disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic cause a high burden of psychological distress in people worldwide. Interventions to enable people to better cope with such distress should be based on the best available evidence. We therefore performed a scoping review to systematically identify and summarize the available literature of interventions that target the distress of people in the face of highly contagious disease outbreaks. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (January 2000 to May 7, 2020), and reference lists were systematically searched and screened by two independent reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative studies investigating the effects of psychological interventions before, during, and after outbreaks of highly contagious emerging infectious diseases, such as SARS, MERS, Ebola, or COVID-19 were included. Study effects were grouped (e.g. for healthcare professionals, community members, people at risk) and intervention contents at the individual and organizational level summarized. We assessed the level of evidence using a modified scheme from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. RESULTS: Of 4030 records found, 19 studies were included (two RCTs). Most interventions were delivered during-exposure and face-to-face, focused on healthcare workers and crisis personnel, and combined psychoeducation with training of coping strategies. Based on two high-quality studies, beneficial effects were reported for resilience factors (e.g. positive cognitive appraisal) and professional attitudes of healthcare workers, with mixed findings for mental health (e.g. depression). Across all studies, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators. We identified seven ongoing studies mostly using online- and mobile-based deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: There is preliminary evidence for beneficial effects of interventions to enable people to better cope with the distress of highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks. Besides the need for more high-quality studies, the summarized evidence may inform decision makers to plan interventions during the current pandemic and to develop pandemic preparedness plans.
BACKGROUND:Acute disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic cause a high burden of psychological distress in people worldwide. Interventions to enable people to better cope with such distress should be based on the best available evidence. We therefore performed a scoping review to systematically identify and summarize the available literature of interventions that target the distress of people in the face of highly contagious disease outbreaks. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (January 2000 to May 7, 2020), and reference lists were systematically searched and screened by two independent reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative studies investigating the effects of psychological interventions before, during, and after outbreaks of highly contagious emerging infectious diseases, such as SARS, MERS, Ebola, or COVID-19 were included. Study effects were grouped (e.g. for healthcare professionals, community members, people at risk) and intervention contents at the individual and organizational level summarized. We assessed the level of evidence using a modified scheme from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. RESULTS: Of 4030 records found, 19 studies were included (two RCTs). Most interventions were delivered during-exposure and face-to-face, focused on healthcare workers and crisis personnel, and combined psychoeducation with training of coping strategies. Based on two high-quality studies, beneficial effects were reported for resilience factors (e.g. positive cognitive appraisal) and professional attitudes of healthcare workers, with mixed findings for mental health (e.g. depression). Across all studies, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators. We identified seven ongoing studies mostly using online- and mobile-based deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: There is preliminary evidence for beneficial effects of interventions to enable people to better cope with the distress of highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks. Besides the need for more high-quality studies, the summarized evidence may inform decision makers to plan interventions during the current pandemic and to develop pandemic preparedness plans.
Authors: Andria Aiello; Michelle Young-Eun Khayeri; Shreyshree Raja; Nathalie Peladeau; Donna Romano; Molyn Leszcz; Robert G Maunder; Marci Rose; Mary Anne Adam; Clare Pain; Andrea Moore; Diane Savage; Rabbi Bernard Schulman Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Robert G Maunder; William J Lancee; Reet Mae; Leslie Vincent; Nathalie Peladeau; Mary Agnes Beduz; Jonathan J Hunter; Molyn Leszcz Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jonathan P Rogers; Edward Chesney; Dominic Oliver; Thomas A Pollak; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Michael S Zandi; Glyn Lewis; Anthony S David Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: M Morelli; G Cyrus; I Weissbecker; J Kpangbai; M Mallow; A Leichner; E Ryan; R Wener; J Gao; J Antigua; A C Levine; F Feuchte Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) Date: 2019-08-13
Authors: Jiaqi Xiong; Orly Lipsitz; Flora Nasri; Leanna M W Lui; Hartej Gill; Lee Phan; David Chen-Li; Michelle Iacobucci; Roger Ho; Amna Majeed; Roger S McIntyre Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-08-08 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Raquel Lara; Martha Fernández-Daza; Sara Zabarain-Cogollo; María Angustias Olivencia-Carrión; Manuel Jiménez-Torres; María Demelza Olivencia-Carrión; Adelaida Ogallar-Blanco; Débora Godoy-Izquierdo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Fan-Yun Lan; Christopher Scheibler; Maria Soledad Hershey; Juan Luis Romero-Cabrera; Gabriel C Gaviola; Ioanna Yiannakou; Alejandro Fernandez-Montero; Costas A Christophi; David C Christiani; Mercedes Sotos-Prieto; Stefanos N Kales Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Manpreet Blessin; Sophie Lehmann; Angela M Kunzler; Rolf van Dick; Klaus Lieb Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-05 Impact factor: 4.614