Literature DB >> 32032543

Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.

Yu-Tao Xiang1, Yuan Yang2, Wen Li3, Ling Zhang4, Qinge Zhang4, Teris Cheung5, Chee H Ng6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32032543      PMCID: PMC7128153          DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


× No keyword cloud information.
The 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia, believed to have originated in a wet market in Wuhan, Hubei province, China at the end of 2019, has gained intense attention nationwide and globally. To lower the risk of further disease transmission, the authority in Wuhan suspended public transport indefinitely from Jan 23, 2020; similar measures were adopted soon in many other cities in China. As of Jan 25, 2020, 30 Chinese provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions covering over 1·3 billion people have initiated first-level responses to major public health emergencies. A range of measures has been urgently adopted,1, 2 such as early identification and isolation of suspected and diagnosed cases, contact tracing and monitoring, collection of clinical data and biological samples from patients, dissemination of regional and national diagnostic criteria and expert treatment consensus, establishment of isolation units and hospitals, and prompt provision of medical supplies and external expert teams to Hubei province. The emergence of the 2019-nCoV pneumonia has parallels with the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which was caused by another coronavirus that killed 349 of 5327 patients with confirmed infection in China. Although the diseases have different clinical presentations,1, 4 the infectious cause, epidemiological features, fast transmission pattern, and insufficient preparedness of health authorities to address the outbreaks are similar. So far, mental health care for the patients and health professionals directly affected by the 2019-nCoV epidemic has been under-addressed, although the National Health Commission of China released the notification of basic principles for emergency psychological crisis interventions for the 2019-nCoV pneumonia on Jan 26, 2020. This notification contained a reference to mental health problems and interventions that occurred during the 2003 SARS outbreak, and mentioned that mental health care should be provided for patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonitis, close contacts, suspected cases who are isolated at home, patients in fever clinics, families and friends of affected people, health professionals caring for infected patients, and the public who are in need. To date, epidemiological data on the mental health problems and psychiatric morbidity of those suspected or diagnosed with the 2019-nCoV and their treating health professionals have not been available; therefore how best to respond to challenges during the outbreak is unknown. The observations of mental health consequences and measures taken during the 2003 SARS outbreak could help inform health authorities and the public to provide mental health interventions to those who are in need. Patients with confirmed or suspected 2019-nCoV may experience fear of the consequences of infection with a potentially fatal new virus, and those in quarantine might experience boredom, loneliness, and anger. Furthermore, symptoms of the infection, such as fever, hypoxia, and cough, as well as adverse effects of treatment, such as insomnia caused by corticosteroids, could lead to worsening anxiety and mental distress. 2019-nCoV has been repeatedly described as a killer virus, for example on WeChat, which has perpetuated the sense of danger and uncertainty among health workers and the public. In the early phase of the SARS outbreak, a range of psychiatric morbidities, including persistent depression, anxiety, panic attacks, psychomotor excitement, psychotic symptoms, delirium, and even suicidality, were reported.6, 7 Mandatory contact tracing and 14 days quarantine, which form part of the public health responses to the 2019-nCoV pneumonia outbreak, could increase patients' anxiety and guilt about the effects of contagion, quarantine, and stigma on their families and friends. Health professionals, especially those working in hospitals caring for people with confirmed or suspected 2019-nCoV pneumonia, are vulnerable to both high risk of infection and mental health problems. They may also experience fear of contagion and spreading the virus to their families, friends, or colleagues. Health workers in a Beijing hospital who were quarantined, worked in high-risk clinical settings such as SARS units, or had family or friends who were infected with SARS, had substantially more post-traumatic stress symptoms than those without these experiences. Health professionals who worked in SARS units and hospitals during the SARS outbreak also reported depression, anxiety, fear, and frustration.6, 9 Despite the common mental health problems and disorders found among patients and health workers in such settings, most health professionals working in isolation units and hospitals do not receive any training in providing mental health care. Timely mental health care needs to be developed urgently. Some methods used in the SARS outbreak could be helpful for the response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak. First, multidisciplinary mental health teams established by health authorities at regional and national levels (including psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists, and other mental health workers) should deliver mental health support to patients and health workers. Specialised psychiatric treatments and appropriate mental health services and facilities should be provided for patients with comorbid mental disorders. Second, clear communication with regular and accurate updates about the 2019-nCoV outbreak should be provided to both health workers and patients in order to address their sense of uncertainty and fear. Treatment plans, progress reports, and health status updates should be given to both patients and their families. Third, secure services should be set up to provide psychological counselling using electronic devices and applications (such as smartphones and WeChat) for affected patients, as well as their families and members of the public. Using safe communication channels between patients and families, such as smartphone communication and WeChat, should be encouraged to decrease isolation. Fourth, suspected and diagnosed patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia as well as health professionals working in hospitals caring for infected patients should receive regular clinical screening for depression, anxiety, and suicidality by mental health workers. Timely psychiatric treatments should be provided for those presenting with more severe mental health problems. For most patients and health workers, emotional and behavioural responses are part of an adaptive response to extraordinary stress, and psychotherapy techniques such as those based on the stress-adaptation model might be helpful.7, 10 If psychotropic medications are used, such as those prescribed by psychiatrists for severe psychiatric comorbidities, basic pharmacological treatment principles of ensuring minimum harm should be followed to reduce harmful effects of any interactions with 2019-nCoV and its treatments. In any biological disaster, themes of fear, uncertainty, and stigmatisation are common and may act as barriers to appropriate medical and mental health interventions. Based on experience from past serious novel pneumonia outbreaks globally and the psychosocial impact of viral epidemics, the development and implementation of mental health assessment, support, treatment, and services are crucial and pressing goals for the health response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak.
  6 in total

1.  Outcomes of SARS survivors in China: not only physical and psychiatric co-morbidities.

Authors:  Y T Xiang; X Yu; G S Ungvari; C U Correll; H Fk Chiu
Journal:  East Asian Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other.

Authors:  S Folkman; S Greer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk.

Authors:  Ping Wu; Yunyun Fang; Zhiqiang Guan; Bin Fan; Junhui Kong; Zhongling Yao; Xinhua Liu; Cordelia J Fuller; Ezra Susser; Jin Lu; Christina W Hoven
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Robert Maunder; Jonathan Hunter; Leslie Vincent; Jocelyn Bennett; Nathalie Peladeau; Molyn Leszcz; Joel Sadavoy; Lieve M Verhaeghe; Rosalie Steinberg; Tony Mazzulli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.

Authors:  Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Shuofeng Yuan; Kin-Hang Kok; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Hin Chu; Jin Yang; Fanfan Xing; Jieling Liu; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Simon Kam-Fai Lo; Kwok-Hung Chan; Vincent Kwok-Man Poon; Wan-Mui Chan; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Jian-Piao Cai; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Honglin Chen; Christopher Kim-Ming Hui; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  840 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 on oral emergency services.

Authors:  Jie Bai; Tao Xu; Ai-Ping Ji; Wei Sun; Ming-Wei Huang
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Psychiatrists as internists: Some considerations following a COVID-19 redeployment experience.

Authors:  Jorge Gómez-Arnau; Raúl González-Lucas; Patricia Sánchez-Páez
Journal:  Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  COVID-19 and psychiatrists' responsibilities: a WPA position paper.

Authors:  Donna E Stewart; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Insomnia and psychological reactions during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.

Authors:  Yun Li; Qingsong Qin; Qimeng Sun; Larry D Sanford; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Xiangdong Tang
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  [Is Spain prepared to provide psychological support during the COVID-19 crisis?]

Authors:  Carlos Barbosa-Torres
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Mental health of healthcare professionals during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yimenu Yitayih; Seblework Mekonen; Ahmed Zeynudin; Embialle Mengistie; Argaw Ambelu
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‑19) in Pakistan: Psychological impact and coping strategies of Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Khola Noreen; Muhammad Umar; Syed Arshad Sabir; Rehana Rehman
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 8.  Response to the Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) Pandemic Across Africa: Successes, Challenges, and Implications for the Future.

Authors:  Olayinka O Ogunleye; Debashis Basu; Debjani Mueller; Jacqueline Sneddon; R Andrew Seaton; Adesola F Yinka-Ogunleye; Joshua Wamboga; Nenad Miljković; Julius C Mwita; Godfrey Mutashambara Rwegerera; Amos Massele; Okwen Patrick; Loveline Lum Niba; Melaine Nsaikila; Wafaa M Rashed; Mohamed Ali Hussein; Rehab Hegazy; Adefolarin A Amu; Baffour Boaten Boahen-Boaten; Zinhle Matsebula; Prudence Gwebu; Bongani Chirigo; Nongabisa Mkhabela; Tenelisiwe Dlamini; Siphiwe Sithole; Sandile Malaza; Sikhumbuzo Dlamini; Daniel Afriyie; George Awuku Asare; Seth Kwabena Amponsah; Israel Sefah; Margaret Oluka; Anastasia N Guantai; Sylvia A Opanga; Tebello Violet Sarele; Refeletse Keabetsoe Mafisa; Ibrahim Chikowe; Felix Khuluza; Dan Kibuule; Francis Kalemeera; Mwangana Mubita; Joseph Fadare; Laurien Sibomana; Gwendoline Malegwale Ramokgopa; Carmen Whyte; Tshegofatso Maimela; Johannes Hugo; Johanna C Meyer; Natalie Schellack; Enos M Rampamba; Adel Visser; Abubakr Alfadl; Elfatih M Malik; Oliver Ombeva Malande; Aubrey C Kalungia; Chiluba Mwila; Trust Zaranyika; Blessmore Vimbai Chaibva; Ioana D Olaru; Nyasha Masuka; Janney Wale; Lenias Hwenda; Regina Kamoga; Ruaraidh Hill; Corrado Barbui; Tomasz Bochenek; Amanj Kurdi; Stephen Campbell; Antony P Martin; Thuy Nguyen Thi Phuong; Binh Nguyen Thanh; Brian Godman
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.810

9. 

Authors:  Roxanne Lemieux; Julia Garon-Bissonnette; Mathilde Loiselle; Élodie Martel; Christine Drouin-Maziade; Nicolas Berthelot
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.356

10.  Profile of distress callers and service utilisation of tele-counselling among the population of Assam, India: an exploratory study during COVID-19.

Authors:  Mythili Hazarika; Bornali Das; Shyamanta Das; Atanu Baruah; Nivedita Sharma; Chandamita Barua; Jayashree Das; Sandamita Choudhury; Dyuksha Hazarika; Phulen Sarma; Samrat Singh Bhandari
Journal:  Open J Psychiatry Allied Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.