AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring in identifying recurrent laryngeal nerves and decreasing the incidence of nerve injury in minimally invasive esophagectomies for esophageal cancers. METHODS: A total of 167 minimally invasive esophagectomy patients were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into intraoperative neuromonitoring (n = 84) and no intraoperative neuromonitoring (n = 83) groups, based on whether or not intraoperative neuromonitoring was used during surgery. We compared short-term surgical outcomes and incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy between the two groups before and after propensity score matching. The association between the loss of signal and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was also evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (grade 2 and higher) was lower in the intraoperative neuromonitoring group than in the no intraoperative neuromonitoring group (6.0% vs 21.2%, P = 0.02). The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy recovery within 6 months was also significantly higher in the intraoperative neuromonitoring group (87.5% vs 20.0%, P < 0.01). The positive and negative predictive values of intraoperative neuromonitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were 60% (9/15) and 86.9% (60/69), respectively. The duration from paralysis to recovery was shorter in recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy cases with negative loss of signal results than in cases with positive loss of signal results (median: 43 days vs 95 days). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is useful in identifying recurrent laryngeal nerves and may aid in reducing the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during esophageal surgery.
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring in identifying recurrent laryngeal nerves and decreasing the incidence of nerve injury in minimally invasive esophagectomies for esophageal cancers. METHODS: A total of 167 minimally invasive esophagectomy patients were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into intraoperative neuromonitoring (n = 84) and no intraoperative neuromonitoring (n = 83) groups, based on whether or not intraoperative neuromonitoring was used during surgery. We compared short-term surgical outcomes and incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy between the two groups before and after propensity score matching. The association between the loss of signal and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was also evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (grade 2 and higher) was lower in the intraoperative neuromonitoring group than in the no intraoperative neuromonitoring group (6.0% vs 21.2%, P = 0.02). The rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy recovery within 6 months was also significantly higher in the intraoperative neuromonitoring group (87.5% vs 20.0%, P < 0.01). The positive and negative predictive values of intraoperative neuromonitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were 60% (9/15) and 86.9% (60/69), respectively. The duration from paralysis to recovery was shorter in recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy cases with negative loss of signal results than in cases with positive loss of signal results (median: 43 days vs 95 days). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is useful in identifying recurrent laryngeal nerves and may aid in reducing the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during esophageal surgery.
Authors: Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321