The complete blood cell count (CBC) is a crucial test for diagnosing and managing of a variety of hematological disorders, provided that a high degree of quality can be assured throughout the testing process. Although the modern hematology analyzers are now capable to generate rapid and accurate results in most clinical circumstances, spurious results related either to white blood cells (WBC) or other parameters of CBC may occur, then leading to further unnecessary investigations and/or inappropriate clinical management. Several causes of spuriously high and low WBC counts have been reported, thus including platelets aggregate and large platelets, presence of nucleated red blood cells, red blood cells resistant to lysis, cryoglobulins, cryofibrinogen, lipidic droplets, microorganism, embolism of adipose tissue. Since WBC aggregates have been occasionally reported as causes of spuriously low test results, we describe here the case of spurious WBC count observed with the hematology analyzer Sysmex XN 9000.
The phenomenon of leukocyte agglutination in peripheral blood is reported as a rare and possible transient event. The scientific literature describes some cases associated with cancers, severe infections, autoimmune disorders or hepatic diseases. Although the phenomenon of EDTA-induced platelet agglutination is relatively frequent, some cases of in vitro leukocyte aggregation have also been reported. Spurious WBC counts due EDTA -induced leukoagglutinins has been reported in association with cirrhosis, infections, autoimmune diseases, uremia, malignancies and immunosuppression Anand M et al. concluded that the leukocyte aggregation in vitro is a time-dependent phenomenon. In our case the larger aggregates were overlooked by the analyzer, thus leading to underestimating the WBC count.1, 4 Instead, the scattergram generated by the WNR channel was normal. In WDF channel, WBC are counted and differentiated, whilst abnormal cells (e.g., immature WBC and atypical lymphocytes) are detected with a dedicated reagent. The WNR channel counts WBC and perform differential counting of basophils and NRBC with a different reagent. In this case specimen was stored at room temperature for 24 h, confirming the presence of the leukocyte aggregates. Since the presence of cold agglutinins reacting with WBC antigens is a similar phenomenon, we repeated the CBC and the blood film after incubation at 37 °C to rule out this possibility, but we failed to observe any difference. In a previous article, Tantanate described an incorrect WBC count using an XN analyzer, showing that the WBC count was very low in the WNR channel but was normal in the WDF channel as well as using a different analyzer and after blood smear revision. It was hence concluded that these differences were due to the use of different reagents in the two channels (i.e., more acid in the WNR channel compared to the WDF channel). The more acid reagent may cause the lysis of fragile WBC, especially in the presence of abnormal WBC or in patients receiving cytotoxic drugs. The mechanism leading to leukocyte aggregation has not been entirely elucidated, though more frequently attributed to EDTA. Unlike the case earlier published by Sultan and Irfan who report on a pregnant woman with spurious low WBC count due to EDTA- induced agglutination (no leukocyte aggregates could be observed in a paired citrate-plasma sample), the leukocyte aggregates in our case were also present in the citrate sample.Interestingly, Hoffman reported that EDTA-induced leukoagglutination may be resolved by adding kanamycin sulphate to the sample but, as earlier discussed, agglutination was not probably caused by EDTA in our case. Unfortunately, the patient did not show up for further evaluation, consequently we were unable to perform further evaluations as the collection of a blood sample use of Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution-A (ACD-A) that in some cases is preferred because this phenomenon cannot be always eliminated using citrate as an additive. Although we cannot provide a definitive explanation on the real nature of these aggregates, it is important that laboratory professionals acknowledge the presence of leukocyte aggregates by correctly interpreting tests results, as well as the appearance of abnormal patters in the scattergrams and flag, as in this case the alert “IG” message, of their hematological analyzers.
Authors: Massimo Daves; Elmar M Zagler; Roberto Cemin; Flora Gnech; Alexandra Joos; Stefan Platzgummer; Giuseppe Lippi Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.443