Literature DB >> 33528006

Efficiently transporting causal direct and indirect effects to new populations under intermediate confounding and with multiple mediators.

Kara E Rudolph1, Iván Díaz1.   

Abstract

The same intervention can produce different effects in different sites. Existing transport mediation estimators can estimate the extent to which such differences can be explained by differences in compositional factors and the mechanisms by which mediating or intermediate variables are produced; however, they are limited to consider a single, binary mediator. We propose novel nonparametric estimators of transported interventional (in)direct effects that consider multiple, high-dimensional mediators and a single, binary intermediate variable. They are multiply robust, efficient, asymptotically normal, and can incorporate data-adaptive estimation of nuisance parameters. They can be applied to understand differences in treatment effects across sites and/or to predict treatment effects in a target site based on outcome data in source sites.
© The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interventional indirect effect; Mediation; Non-parametric methods; Stochastic indirect effect; Targeted learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 33528006      PMCID: PMC9295139          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.279


  19 in total

1.  Direct effect models.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Estimation of direct causal effects.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Sandra E Sinisi; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

4.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  An omnibus non-parametric test of equality in distribution for unknown functions.

Authors:  Alexander R Luedtke; Marco Carone; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Implications of WASH Benefits trials for water and sanitation - Authors' reply.

Authors:  Benjamin F Arnold; Clair Null; Stephen P Luby; John M Colford
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 26.763

8.  Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Stijn Vansteelandt; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  A Generally Efficient Targeted Minimum Loss Based Estimator based on the Highly Adaptive Lasso.

Authors:  Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  Transporting stochastic direct and indirect effects to new populations.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Jonathan Levy; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 1.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.