Antonio Marmolejo Chavira1, Jorge Farell Rivas2, Ana Paula Ruiz Funes Molina3, Sergio Ayala de la Cruz4, Alejandro Cruz Zárate3, Alfonso Bandin Musa5, Víctor José Cuevas Osorio3. 1. Department of Surgery, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico. dr.marmolejo.ch@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Director of Surgical Residency Program, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico. 3. Department of Surgery, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 7th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico. 4. Department of Clinical Pathology, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Av. Francisco I. Madero Pte. Mitras Centro, 1st Floor, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. 5. Department of Transplants, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, PEMEX, 10th Floor, Periférico Sur 4091 Fuentes del Pedregal, Tlalpan, 14140, Mexico City, Mexico.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The surgical education has evolved by adopting the visual platforms as a resource of searching. The videos complement the visual learning of surgical techniques of trainees, residents, and surgeons. YouTube® is the most frequently consulted platform in the surgical field. WebSurg® and GIBLIB® are two recognized medical platforms. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) is the most important and effective method to reduce the risk of bile duct injury (BDI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Reaching a satisfactory CVS is a crucial point. We evaluated the CVS of videos on WebSurg® and GIBLIB®, comparing the results with those of the worldwide most popular video platform. METHODS: We performed a search under the term "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy" on the virtual platforms YouTube®, GIBLIB®, and WebSurg®. Three evaluators reviewed the 77 selected videos using the "Sanford-Strasberg' CVS score." The inferential analysis was performed between two groups: YouTube® and Non-YouTube (GIBLIB® and WebSurg®). The characteristics of each video were analyzed including country of origin, type of profile, number of views, and number of Likes. RESULTS: Satisfactory CVS obtained from each of the platforms was GIBLIB® 40%; WebSurg® 44.4%; YouTube® 27.7%. The comparative analysis of CVS quality and CVS score for the Non-YouTube and YouTube® groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.142, p = 0.377, respectively). CONCLUSION: The videos on GIBLIB® and WebSurg® offer a higher probability of satisfactory CVS compared to YouTube®. Nevertheless, there is no significant superiority of GIBLIB® and WebSurg® over YouTube®.
INTRODUCTION: The surgical education has evolved by adopting the visual platforms as a resource of searching. The videos complement the visual learning of surgical techniques of trainees, residents, and surgeons. YouTube® is the most frequently consulted platform in the surgical field. WebSurg® and GIBLIB® are two recognized medical platforms. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) is the most important and effective method to reduce the risk of bile duct injury (BDI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Reaching a satisfactory CVS is a crucial point. We evaluated the CVS of videos on WebSurg® and GIBLIB®, comparing the results with those of the worldwide most popular video platform. METHODS: We performed a search under the term "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy" on the virtual platforms YouTube®, GIBLIB®, and WebSurg®. Three evaluators reviewed the 77 selected videos using the "Sanford-Strasberg' CVS score." The inferential analysis was performed between two groups: YouTube® and Non-YouTube (GIBLIB® and WebSurg®). The characteristics of each video were analyzed including country of origin, type of profile, number of views, and number of Likes. RESULTS: Satisfactory CVS obtained from each of the platforms was GIBLIB® 40%; WebSurg® 44.4%; YouTube® 27.7%. The comparative analysis of CVS quality and CVS score for the Non-YouTube and YouTube® groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.142, p = 0.377, respectively). CONCLUSION: The videos on GIBLIB® and WebSurg® offer a higher probability of satisfactory CVS compared to YouTube®. Nevertheless, there is no significant superiority of GIBLIB® and WebSurg® over YouTube®.
Authors: Philip H Pucher; L Michael Brunt; Robert D Fanelli; Horacio J Asbun; Rajesh Aggarwal Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Marquita R Decker; Christopher M Dodgion; Alvin C Kwok; Yue-Yung Hu; Jeff A Havlena; Wei Jiang; Stuart R Lipsitz; K Craig Kent; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Allison K Rapp; Michael G Healy; Mary E Charlton; Jerrod N Keith; Marcy E Rosenbaum; Muneera R Kapadia Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: K Tim Buddingh; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Lianne van Buuren; Jan B F Hulscher; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 4.584