Sebastian Pomplun1, Muhammad Jbara1, Anthony J Quartararo1, Genwei Zhang1, Joseph S Brown1, Yen-Chun Lee1, Xiyun Ye1, Stephanie Hanna1, Bradley L Pentelute1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 2. The Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 500 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States. 3. Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 4. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States.
Abstract
The β-coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic. Affinity reagents targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are of interest for the development of therapeutics and diagnostics. We used affinity selection-mass spectrometry for the rapid discovery of synthetic high-affinity peptide binders for the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. From library screening with 800 million synthetic peptides, we identified three sequences with nanomolar affinities (dissociation constants K d = 80-970 nM) for RBD and selectivity over human serum proteins. Nanomolar RBD concentrations in a biological matrix could be detected using the biotinylated lead peptide in ELISA format. These peptides do not compete for ACE2 binding, and their site of interaction on the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD might be unrelated to the ACE2 binding site, making them potential orthogonal reagents for sandwich immunoassays. These findings serve as a starting point for the development of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics or conjugates for virus-directed delivery of therapeutics.
The β-coronavirusSARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic. Affinity reagents targeting the SARS-CoV-2spike protein are of interest for the development of therapeutics and diagnostics. We used affinity selection-mass spectrometry for the rapid discovery of synthetic high-affinity peptide binders for the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2spike protein. From library screening with 800 million synthetic peptides, we identified three sequences with nanomolar affinities (dissociation constants K d = 80-970 nM) for RBD and selectivity over human serum proteins. Nanomolar RBD concentrations in a biological matrix could be detected using the biotinylated lead peptide in ELISA format. These peptides do not compete for ACE2 binding, and their site of interaction on the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD might be unrelated to the ACE2 binding site, making them potential orthogonal reagents for sandwich immunoassays. These findings serve as a starting point for the development of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics or conjugates for virus-directed delivery of therapeutics.
Since
the end of 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
pandemic. With 30 million cases and over 950 000 deaths (by
August 2020), SARS-CoV-2 has spread further than SARS-CoV-1 or middle
east respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV).[1,2] There is a
need for diagnostic testing of SARS-CoV-2 to improve containment.[3,4] Currently, the reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
method is the gold standard of SARS-CoV-2 detection.[5,6] Serologic detection of patient-derived antibodies can be used to
track SARS-CoV-2 progression and immunity but has limited early detection
ability.[6−8] Direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 has been proposed
in scalable, rapidly deployed formats but often suffers from low sensitivity
that limits effectivity in general population testing.[9,10] Thus, the discovery of additional reagents to enable early and rapid
SARS-CoV-2 detection and/or neutralization is critical.Recognition
of viral surface proteins by high-affinity reagents
represents a promising strategy for virus detection or neutralization.
Coronaviruses display multiple copies of spike protein on their surface.[11,12] SARS-CoV-2 (as well as SARS-CoV-1) binds with high affinity to humanangiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors as a primary mechanism
for initiating cell invasion.[13,14] Several proteins that
target the SARS-CoV-2spike have been described. Soluble human and
modified ACE2 show a high affinity to the SARS-CoV-2spike protein
receptor binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing activity in live virus
infection models.[15,16] Computational design led to the
discovery of high-affinity miniprotein binders for RBD.[17] Also, numerous neutralizing antibodies and nanobodies
binding to the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD have been described.[18,19]Peptide sequences with high affinity and selectivity for the
SARS-CoV-2spike protein and its RBD could be advanced for the development of
new diagnostic or therapeutic modalities. Peptides have been previously
investigated as potential SARS-CoV-2 antiviral agents. For example,
α-helical peptides binding to the S2 unit of the coronavirusspike protein have been described as potent fusion inhibitors.[20] Computational and experimental studies supported
targeting the spike RBD with linear peptides derived from the ACE2
N-terminus.[21,22] Investigations in our laboratory,
however, indicated that peptides up to 23 residues in length derived
from the ACE2 N-terminus do not associate with high affinity to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
expressed and isolated from human cells.[23] With straightforward handling, preparation, and late-stage modification,[24−26] peptides are attractive potential candidates for point-of-care diagnostics.Here, we report the discovery of synthetic peptides (13 residues)
with nanomolar affinity for the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD. We leveraged
a combinatorial affinity selection–mass spectrometry (AS–MS)
platform[27] for the rapid identification
of sequences with high affinity and selectivity toward RBD over human
proteins. After chemical synthesis of the identified peptides, validation
of their binding activity was observed using biolayer interferometry
(BLI) and a magnetic bead pull-down assay. In an enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA), these peptides detected RBD after addition to a complex
biological matrix.
Results and Discussion
Peptides
with a shared sequence motif were identified by affinity
selection–mass spectrometry (AS–MS). SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
was biotinylated and immobilized on streptavidin-coated magnetic beads.
Following an AS–MS protocol recently established by our group,[27,28] we screened four ∼200 million member peptide libraries against
the immobilized spike RBD (the peptide libraries were synthesized
and characterized as previously described[27]). The peptide library design was X12K, where X = any
canonical amino acid except Ile and Cys. In parallel, with the same
library, we performed an enrichment with the anti-hemagglutinin monoclonal
antibody 12ca5 to identify nonspecific binders, which would appear
in both selections. Unbound peptides were removed by three washes
with 1× PBS; potential binders were eluted with the denaturant
guanidinium hydrochloride and analyzed by nano-liquid-chromatography–tandem
mass spectrometry (nanoLC–MS/MS). The resultant MS spectra
were visualized with the sequencing software PEAKS 8.5 and further
refined with a Python script that nominated variants matching the
library design.[29]From the ∼800
million screened peptides, three peptide sequences
were identified (1–3, Figure a). An extracted ion chromatogram
was generated for the target mass of each peptide, revealing that
each was selectively enriched against the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and
not the 12ca5 off-target control (Figures S2–S4). The three identified peptides shared a common motif at the N-terminus:
*V*GL (red letters in Figure A). For the additional six positions, we observed enrichment
for specific residues as indicated by blue letters (Figure A). Based on the similarity
of the three sequences, the residues with the highest positional frequencies
were combined resulting in the consensus sequence (4, Figure a).
Figure 1
SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
binding peptides with nanomolar affinity were
identified by affinity selection–mass spectrometry. (A) Schematic
representation of the AS–MS workflow and enriched sequences.
In brief, biotinylated SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD was immobilized on magnetic
streptavidin beads and then incubated with peptide libraries. Unbound
members were removed by washing. Peptides bound to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
were eluted and analyzed by nanoLC–MS/MS. (B) BLI curves for
association/dissociation of peptides 1–4 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (in kinetic buffer: 1× PBS, pH = 7.2,
0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% Tween-20). While peptide 4 had higher affinity, peptide 1, compared to 2 and 4, had the best solubility and was used for all
further investigations. Peptides 2 and 4 precipitated from solution within hours at concentrations greater
than 10 μM. Kinetic binding results are reported in Table S1. (C) BLI curves for 1 (blue
line) and scrambled analogues of 1 (light and dark gray
lines, respectively; sc1, GSVKRWLTYVKNFK; and sc2, RFYVTKGWSNKVLK).
(D) Self-competition analysis (BLI association) of 1 to
SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD: peptide 1-biotin immobilized on
BLI tips was dipped into solutions containing SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
and 1 ([RBD] = 500 nM; [1] = 0–16
μM). Increasing the concentration of 1 in solution
causes less free RBD available in solution (due to RBD-1 complex formation) and results in a concentration-dependent decrease
in BLI response.
SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
binding peptides with nanomolar affinity were
identified by affinity selection–mass spectrometry. (A) Schematic
representation of the AS–MS workflow and enriched sequences.
In brief, biotinylated SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD was immobilized on magnetic
streptavidin beads and then incubated with peptide libraries. Unbound
members were removed by washing. Peptides bound to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
were eluted and analyzed by nanoLC–MS/MS. (B) BLI curves for
association/dissociation of peptides 1–4 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (in kinetic buffer: 1× PBS, pH = 7.2,
0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% Tween-20). While peptide 4 had higher affinity, peptide 1, compared to 2 and 4, had the best solubility and was used for all
further investigations. Peptides 2 and 4 precipitated from solution within hours at concentrations greater
than 10 μM. Kinetic binding results are reported in Table S1. (C) BLI curves for 1 (blue
line) and scrambled analogues of 1 (light and dark gray
lines, respectively; sc1, GSVKRWLTYVKNFK; and sc2, RFYVTKGWSNKVLK).
(D) Self-competition analysis (BLI association) of 1 to
SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD: peptide 1-biotin immobilized on
BLI tips was dipped into solutions containing SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
and 1 ([RBD] = 500 nM; [1] = 0–16
μM). Increasing the concentration of 1 in solution
causes less free RBD available in solution (due to RBD-1 complex formation) and results in a concentration-dependent decrease
in BLI response.The identified peptide
sequences bound SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD with
nanomolar affinity. To validate the identified sequences, we synthesized
biotinylated peptides 1–4. The compounds
were immobilized on streptavidin-coated biolayer interferometry (BLI)
tips and used to measure association and dissociation of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
at different concentrations. Peptides 1–3 bound the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD with apparent dissociation
constants, Kd, of 250, 290, and 970 nM,
respectively (Figure B). The consensus peptide 4 bound the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
with Kd = 80 nM, a ∼3-fold improvement
over the originally identified hit peptide 1 (Figure B). To determine
whether the binding is sequence-specific, two scrambled variants of
peptide 1 (sc1 and sc2) were prepared and tested by BLI,
and no association was observed in either case (Figure C). We also tested the association of peptide 1 to 12ca5 and observed minimal association especially when
compared directly to a known positive control 12ca5 binder (Figure S5). While peptide 4 had
the highest affinity to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD, peptide 1 was the most soluble and was used for all further investigations.Peptide 1 associates to a specific site on the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
as determined by a self-competition binding assay. We immobilized
peptide 1-biotin on BLI tips and dipped them into solutions
containing SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and peptide 1 ([RBD]
= 500 nM; [1] = 0–16 μM). With an increasing
concentration of peptide 1 in solution, we observed a
concentration-dependent decrease in binding. With less free RBD available
in solution, less RBD associates to the BLI tip coated in peptide 1 (Figure C).Peptide 1 does not interfere with ACE2 binding
to
the RBD. For this experiment, we immobilized ACE2 on BLI tips and
dipped them into solutions of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and peptide 1 ([RBD] = 100 nM; [1] = 0–62 μM, Figure S6). We did not observe a decrease in
binding response. This can be explained by the fact that peptide 1 does not have sufficient affinity to block binding of RBD
to ACE2 or that peptide 1 might bind to a site on the
RBD separate from ACE2. In the latter case, ACE2 and peptide 1-biotin might form an orthogonal ligand pair useful for spike-RBD
sandwich immunoassays.Alanine scanning mutagenesis of sequence 1 was used
to determine the importance of the common motif (*V*GL) and other
residues in binding to RBD (Figure ). Mutations V2A and G4A decreased binding to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD,
confirming their contributions to the motif identified (Figure ). Mutations of hydrophobic
residues reduced the peptide binding affinity. Specifically, the mutants
F3A, L5A, and W8A decreased the binding by 5- to 13-fold. Position
3 in the other identified peptides contained a methionine suggesting
that a hydrophobic residue is important at this site. Similarly, position
8 needs to be either tryptophan or tyrosine, indicating that an aromatic
group is important.
Figure 2
Alanine scanning and sequence truncations of 1 reveal
binding hotspots. Binding to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD of alanine mutants
and truncated peptides was measured by BLI as detailed in Figure . Ratios between
binding of original sequence 1 and each mutant, respectively,
are shown as green bars. Individual steady state Kd values are shown in the right column. Kinetic binding
results are reported in Table S1.
Alanine scanning and sequence truncations of 1 reveal
binding hotspots. Binding to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD of alanine mutants
and truncated peptides was measured by BLI as detailed in Figure . Ratios between
binding of original sequence 1 and each mutant, respectively,
are shown as green bars. Individual steady state Kd values are shown in the right column. Kinetic binding
results are reported in Table S1.To assess the importance of sequence length, we
synthesized N-terminal
and C-terminal truncations of peptide 1. A one residue
truncation from the N-terminus abolished binding, confirming the frame
dependency of the binding motif. N-terminal acetylation reduced the
binding affinity to Kd = 520 nM, indicating
that the N-terminal amino group is important. Truncations from the
C-terminus decreased binding ∼10-fold.Peptide 1 binds to the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-1
and MERS-CoVcoronaviruses. Patient-derived antibodies often bind
SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 selectively, with less binding activity
against MERS-CoV.[30] However, the spike
protein shares some degree of sequence and structural similarity among
several species of the β-coronavirus family.[31] We tested the binding of peptide 1 to the
RBDs of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV and observed a Kd of 600 and 120 nM, respectively (Figure A). The Kd values
are the same order of magnitude as the binding of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD.
Figure 3
Peptide 1 binds to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD
and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD.
(A) The binding of peptide 1-biotin to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD
and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was determined by BLI. (B) A structural overlay
of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was performed with
the software PyMol (using PDB structures 6vw1 and 6c6z). Regions with the homology of the secondary
structure between the two proteins are colored in red. The homologous regions were manually analyzed
to identify positions with identical residues in both proteins: blue.
Since peptide 1-biotin binds to both with comparable
affinity, the binding site could potentially be in a region with high
homology.
Peptide 1 binds to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD
and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD.
(A) The binding of peptide 1-biotin to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD
and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was determined by BLI. (B) A structural overlay
of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was performed with
the software PyMol (using PDB structures 6vw1 and 6c6z). Regions with the homology of the secondary
structure between the two proteins are colored in red. The homologous regions were manually analyzed
to identify positions with identical residues in both proteins: blue.
Since peptide 1-biotin binds to both with comparable
affinity, the binding site could potentially be in a region with high
homology.We also investigated the binding
of peptide 1 to the
spike protein of HKU1, which is an endemic human coronavirus.[30,32] Since the receptor-binding domain of this protein was not commercially
available, we compared the binding of peptide 1 to the
HKU1 spike S1 protein subunit and to the SARS-CoV-2spike S1 protein
subunit (both expressed in mammalian cells). The binding of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-S1 demonstrated a Kd of 40 nM but showed considerably weaker association to the HKU1-S1
protein (Figure S7). The stronger binding
affinity of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-S1 (40 nM) compared
to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (250 nM) could arise from reduced conformational
freedom of the RBD as a part of the S1 spike protein compared to the
RBD alone. Alternatively, the difference could be explained by potential
variability in quality of recombinant expression of the different
commercial proteins. In addition, we confirmed binding of peptide 1-biotin to the SARS-CoV-2-spike trimer (Figure S7). The association intensity (comparable to the one
determined using ACE2-biotin) shows that peptide 1-biotin can bind also the full length SARS-CoV-2-spike trimer.Significant
binding was observed with MERS-CoV and peptide 1, suggesting
that a similar binding site might be recognized.
We were intrigued by the retained binding affinity of peptide 1 to MERS-CoV as SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV RBDs
have a high level of structural homology. On a residue level, however,
only SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 share a high level of sequence homology
(∼74%) while MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBDs share only
∼24%. Analyzing the overlay of these proteins via PyMOL, we
found only two patches with residue homology large enough to associate
with a peptide binder (colored in blue in Figure B, sequence alignment in Figure S12). One of these patches is located in proximity
to the ACE2 binding site and the other on the opposite side of the
RBD. Since no perturbation of the ACE2 binding to RBD was observed
in the presence of peptide 1, the patch on the opposite
side of the RBD is suggested as a possible binding site for peptide 1.SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD can be selectively enriched
from human serum
proteins using immobilized peptide 1. To investigate
the binding specificity of 1 to RBD in a biological matrix,
we added SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD to human serum (10% in 1× PBS)
and incubated with magnetic beads displaying peptide 1-biotin (Figure A). We removed
the supernatant, washed the beads, and treated with urea to elute
bound proteins. We analyzed the urea fraction by SDS-PAGE and observed
selective enrichment of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD; no other proteins were
detected (Figure B).
The selective binding of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
and isolation from complex biological media point toward potential
diagnostic applications or the use of this peptide as a delivery agent
for antiviral payloads.
Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD can be selectively enriched
from human serum
proteins. (A) Schematic representation of the pull-down of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
from human serum. (B) Workflow: spike RBD was added to human serum
(RBD: 0.27 mg/mL, 10% human serum, 1× PBS), and the mix was incubated
with magnetic beads (MyOne Dynabeads) displaying peptide 1-biotin (1 h, 4 °C). The supernatant (containing nonbinding proteins)
was removed, and the beads were washed with 1× PBS (3 ×
1 mL). Bound proteins were eluted with 6 M urea (elution 1:50 μL,
30 s; elution 2:50 μL, 120 s) and analyzed by SDS PAGE (C).
The gel shows (from left to right) (1) molecular weight ladder; (2)
purified SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (1 μg); (3) human serum mixed
with SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD; (4) elution 1 (30 μL of elution sample
1); and (5) elution 2 (30 μL of elution sample 2). The analysis
was performed using BoltTM 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gels (10-wells),
165 V for 36 min, utilizing prestained Invitrogen SeeBlueTM Plus2
molecular weight standard with BoltTM LDS sample buffer (4×).
SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD can be selectively enriched
from human serum
proteins. (A) Schematic representation of the pull-down of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
from human serum. (B) Workflow: spike RBD was added to human serum
(RBD: 0.27 mg/mL, 10% human serum, 1× PBS), and the mix was incubated
with magnetic beads (MyOne Dynabeads) displaying peptide 1-biotin (1 h, 4 °C). The supernatant (containing nonbinding proteins)
was removed, and the beads were washed with 1× PBS (3 ×
1 mL). Bound proteins were eluted with 6 M urea (elution 1:50 μL,
30 s; elution 2:50 μL, 120 s) and analyzed by SDS PAGE (C).
The gel shows (from left to right) (1) molecular weight ladder; (2)
purified SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (1 μg); (3) human serum mixed
with SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD; (4) elution 1 (30 μL of elution sample
1); and (5) elution 2 (30 μL of elution sample 2). The analysis
was performed using BoltTM 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gels (10-wells),
165 V for 36 min, utilizing prestained Invitrogen SeeBlueTM Plus2
molecular weight standard with BoltTM LDS sample buffer (4×).Nanomolar to picomolar concentrations of RBD in
a biological matrix
were detected by peptide 1-biotin in an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format. We performed an ELISA by immobilizing
different concentrations of RBD (100 nM to 100 fM) mixed with fetal
bovine serum (FBS) onto the ELISA plate. We then added peptide 1-biotin (100 nM) to each well and subsequently streptavidin-HRP
(horseradish peroxidase) and tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate
(Figure A). We detected
SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD at 100 nM and 100 pM concentrations with a signal
significantly stronger than the background (Figure B and Figure S10). Initial experiments with SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD dissolved in human
serum also resulted in a dose response detection with a significant
signal at a nanomolar RBD concentration (Figure S11). The background signal caused by the peptide in absence
of RBD on the plate could be caused by nonspecific binding of peptide 1-biotin to components of the biological matrix. For a potential
use as a diagnostic tool, further refinement of the detection conditions
will be necessary. We tested the stability of peptide 1-biotin in human serum and found minimal degradation in conditions comparable
to the ELISA (Figure S13).
Figure 5
Picomolar SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
quantities were detected by ELISA.
(A) Schematic representation of the ELISA assay. (B) Workflow: Serial
dilutions (100 nM to 100 fM) of RBD mixed with fetal bovine serum
(FBS) were immobilized on an ELISA plate. The plate was incubated
with peptide 1-biotin, followed by streptavidin-HRP and
TMB substrate. (C) ELISA absorbance readout at 450 nM as a function
of RBD concentrations. Measurements were performed in technical triplicates
(n = 3), and statistical significance was calculated
with the unpaired t test. RBD 100 nM vs no RBD, p = 0.0012 (**); RBD 100 pM vs no RBD, p = 0.018 (*).
Picomolar SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
quantities were detected by ELISA.
(A) Schematic representation of the ELISA assay. (B) Workflow: Serial
dilutions (100 nM to 100 fM) of RBD mixed with fetal bovine serum
(FBS) were immobilized on an ELISA plate. The plate was incubated
with peptide 1-biotin, followed by streptavidin-HRP and
TMB substrate. (C) ELISA absorbance readout at 450 nM as a function
of RBD concentrations. Measurements were performed in technical triplicates
(n = 3), and statistical significance was calculated
with the unpaired t test. RBD 100 nM vs no RBD, p = 0.0012 (**); RBD 100 pM vs no RBD, p = 0.018 (*).
Safety Statement
No unexpected or
unusually high safety
hazards were encountered.
Concluding Remarks
Taken together, we have shown the use of an affinity selection–mass
spectrometry platform[27] for the rapid discovery
of peptides binding to the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD. From 800 million
synthetic peptides screened, we identified three motif-bearing sequences
that have nanomolar affinity. These peptides bind SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD
with selectivity over multiple human serum proteins and could detect
it at nanomolar to picomolar concentrations in an ELISA format. Cross-binding
of peptide 1 to the MERS-CoVcoronavirusspike protein
indicated a possible binding site distal from the binding site for
the humanACE2 receptor.The peptides reported here are potential
starting points for the
development of affinity-based diagnostic tools.[33−35] High-affinity
reagents without direct competition activity for native receptors
could be used for virus-directed delivery of antiviral payloads, or
for the development of proteasome or lysosome targeting chimeras (PROTACs[36,37] and LYTACs[38]). Adapting peptide 1 to a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay or a similar assay
could improve its sensitivity for detection of SARS-CoV-2.[8,39] Because of its selectivity in biological media, peptide 1 could be utilized for the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 in bodily
fluids. Improved diagnostics are a topic of intense COVID-19 research
as they may provide rapid, reliable, and early detection.[40] While direct detection suffers from low sensitivity,[10,41] the rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for patient contact
tracing, identifying hosts, and epidemiologic studies.[2−4] The peptides discovered by our platform may provide a useful SARS-CoV-2
detection modality to help achieve these goals.
Authors: Pranam Chatterjee; Manvitha Ponnapati; Christian Kramme; Alexandru M Plesa; George M Church; Joseph M Jacobson Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2020-11-23
Authors: Nisreen M A Okba; Marcel A Müller; Wentao Li; Chunyan Wang; Corine H GeurtsvanKessel; Victor M Corman; Mart M Lamers; Reina S Sikkema; Erwin de Bruin; Felicity D Chandler; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Quentin Le Hingrat; Diane Descamps; Nadhira Houhou-Fidouh; Chantal B E M Reusken; Berend-Jan Bosch; Christian Drosten; Marion P G Koopmans; Bart L Haagmans Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Daniel Wrapp; Dorien De Vlieger; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Gretel M Torres; Nianshuang Wang; Wander Van Breedam; Kenny Roose; Loes van Schie; Markus Hoffmann; Stefan Pöhlmann; Barney S Graham; Nico Callewaert; Bert Schepens; Xavier Saelens; Jason S McLellan Journal: Cell Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jonathan M Labriola; Shane Miersch; Gang Chen; Chao Chen; Alevtina Pavlenco; Reza Saberianfar; Francesca Caccuri; Alberto Zani; Nitin Sharma; Annie Feng; Daisy W Leung; Arnaldo Caruso; Giuseppe Novelli; Gaya K Amarasinghe; Sachdev S Sidhu Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Fan Yang; Li Liu; Pierre Fernand Neuenschwander; Steven Idell; Ramakrishna Vankayalapati; Krishan Gopal Jain; Ke Du; Honglong Ji; Guohua Yi Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2021-12-29