Literature DB >> 33527085

De Novo Discovery of High-Affinity Peptide Binders for the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein.

Sebastian Pomplun1, Muhammad Jbara1, Anthony J Quartararo1, Genwei Zhang1, Joseph S Brown1, Yen-Chun Lee1, Xiyun Ye1, Stephanie Hanna1, Bradley L Pentelute1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

The β-coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic. Affinity reagents targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are of interest for the development of therapeutics and diagnostics. We used affinity selection-mass spectrometry for the rapid discovery of synthetic high-affinity peptide binders for the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. From library screening with 800 million synthetic peptides, we identified three sequences with nanomolar affinities (dissociation constants K d = 80-970 nM) for RBD and selectivity over human serum proteins. Nanomolar RBD concentrations in a biological matrix could be detected using the biotinylated lead peptide in ELISA format. These peptides do not compete for ACE2 binding, and their site of interaction on the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD might be unrelated to the ACE2 binding site, making them potential orthogonal reagents for sandwich immunoassays. These findings serve as a starting point for the development of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics or conjugates for virus-directed delivery of therapeutics.
© 2020 American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33527085      PMCID: PMC7755081          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

Since the end of 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. With 30 million cases and over 950 000 deaths (by August 2020), SARS-CoV-2 has spread further than SARS-CoV-1 or middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV).[1,2] There is a need for diagnostic testing of SARS-CoV-2 to improve containment.[3,4] Currently, the reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method is the gold standard of SARS-CoV-2 detection.[5,6] Serologic detection of patient-derived antibodies can be used to track SARS-CoV-2 progression and immunity but has limited early detection ability.[6−8] Direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 has been proposed in scalable, rapidly deployed formats but often suffers from low sensitivity that limits effectivity in general population testing.[9,10] Thus, the discovery of additional reagents to enable early and rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection and/or neutralization is critical. Recognition of viral surface proteins by high-affinity reagents represents a promising strategy for virus detection or neutralization. Coronaviruses display multiple copies of spike protein on their surface.[11,12] SARS-CoV-2 (as well as SARS-CoV-1) binds with high affinity to human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors as a primary mechanism for initiating cell invasion.[13,14] Several proteins that target the SARS-CoV-2 spike have been described. Soluble human and modified ACE2 show a high affinity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing activity in live virus infection models.[15,16] Computational design led to the discovery of high-affinity miniprotein binders for RBD.[17] Also, numerous neutralizing antibodies and nanobodies binding to the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD have been described.[18,19] Peptide sequences with high affinity and selectivity for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its RBD could be advanced for the development of new diagnostic or therapeutic modalities. Peptides have been previously investigated as potential SARS-CoV-2 antiviral agents. For example, α-helical peptides binding to the S2 unit of the coronavirus spike protein have been described as potent fusion inhibitors.[20] Computational and experimental studies supported targeting the spike RBD with linear peptides derived from the ACE2 N-terminus.[21,22] Investigations in our laboratory, however, indicated that peptides up to 23 residues in length derived from the ACE2 N-terminus do not associate with high affinity to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD expressed and isolated from human cells.[23] With straightforward handling, preparation, and late-stage modification,[24−26] peptides are attractive potential candidates for point-of-care diagnostics. Here, we report the discovery of synthetic peptides (13 residues) with nanomolar affinity for the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD. We leveraged a combinatorial affinity selection–mass spectrometry (AS–MS) platform[27] for the rapid identification of sequences with high affinity and selectivity toward RBD over human proteins. After chemical synthesis of the identified peptides, validation of their binding activity was observed using biolayer interferometry (BLI) and a magnetic bead pull-down assay. In an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), these peptides detected RBD after addition to a complex biological matrix.

Results and Discussion

Peptides with a shared sequence motif were identified by affinity selection–mass spectrometry (AS–MS). SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD was biotinylated and immobilized on streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. Following an AS–MS protocol recently established by our group,[27,28] we screened four ∼200 million member peptide libraries against the immobilized spike RBD (the peptide libraries were synthesized and characterized as previously described[27]). The peptide library design was X12K, where X = any canonical amino acid except Ile and Cys. In parallel, with the same library, we performed an enrichment with the anti-hemagglutinin monoclonal antibody 12ca5 to identify nonspecific binders, which would appear in both selections. Unbound peptides were removed by three washes with 1× PBS; potential binders were eluted with the denaturant guanidinium hydrochloride and analyzed by nano-liquid-chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC–MS/MS). The resultant MS spectra were visualized with the sequencing software PEAKS 8.5 and further refined with a Python script that nominated variants matching the library design.[29] From the ∼800 million screened peptides, three peptide sequences were identified (1–3, Figure a). An extracted ion chromatogram was generated for the target mass of each peptide, revealing that each was selectively enriched against the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and not the 12ca5 off-target control (Figures S2–S4). The three identified peptides shared a common motif at the N-terminus: *V*GL (red letters in Figure A). For the additional six positions, we observed enrichment for specific residues as indicated by blue letters (Figure A). Based on the similarity of the three sequences, the residues with the highest positional frequencies were combined resulting in the consensus sequence (4, Figure a).
Figure 1

SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD binding peptides with nanomolar affinity were identified by affinity selection–mass spectrometry. (A) Schematic representation of the AS–MS workflow and enriched sequences. In brief, biotinylated SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD was immobilized on magnetic streptavidin beads and then incubated with peptide libraries. Unbound members were removed by washing. Peptides bound to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD were eluted and analyzed by nanoLC–MS/MS. (B) BLI curves for association/dissociation of peptides 1–4 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (in kinetic buffer: 1× PBS, pH = 7.2, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% Tween-20). While peptide 4 had higher affinity, peptide 1, compared to 2 and 4, had the best solubility and was used for all further investigations. Peptides 2 and 4 precipitated from solution within hours at concentrations greater than 10 μM. Kinetic binding results are reported in Table S1. (C) BLI curves for 1 (blue line) and scrambled analogues of 1 (light and dark gray lines, respectively; sc1, GSVKRWLTYVKNFK; and sc2, RFYVTKGWSNKVLK). (D) Self-competition analysis (BLI association) of 1 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD: peptide 1-biotin immobilized on BLI tips was dipped into solutions containing SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and 1 ([RBD] = 500 nM; [1] = 0–16 μM). Increasing the concentration of 1 in solution causes less free RBD available in solution (due to RBD-1 complex formation) and results in a concentration-dependent decrease in BLI response.

SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD binding peptides with nanomolar affinity were identified by affinity selection–mass spectrometry. (A) Schematic representation of the AS–MS workflow and enriched sequences. In brief, biotinylated SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD was immobilized on magnetic streptavidin beads and then incubated with peptide libraries. Unbound members were removed by washing. Peptides bound to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD were eluted and analyzed by nanoLC–MS/MS. (B) BLI curves for association/dissociation of peptides 1–4 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (in kinetic buffer: 1× PBS, pH = 7.2, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% Tween-20). While peptide 4 had higher affinity, peptide 1, compared to 2 and 4, had the best solubility and was used for all further investigations. Peptides 2 and 4 precipitated from solution within hours at concentrations greater than 10 μM. Kinetic binding results are reported in Table S1. (C) BLI curves for 1 (blue line) and scrambled analogues of 1 (light and dark gray lines, respectively; sc1, GSVKRWLTYVKNFK; and sc2, RFYVTKGWSNKVLK). (D) Self-competition analysis (BLI association) of 1 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD: peptide 1-biotin immobilized on BLI tips was dipped into solutions containing SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and 1 ([RBD] = 500 nM; [1] = 0–16 μM). Increasing the concentration of 1 in solution causes less free RBD available in solution (due to RBD-1 complex formation) and results in a concentration-dependent decrease in BLI response. The identified peptide sequences bound SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD with nanomolar affinity. To validate the identified sequences, we synthesized biotinylated peptides 1–4. The compounds were immobilized on streptavidin-coated biolayer interferometry (BLI) tips and used to measure association and dissociation of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD at different concentrations. Peptides 1–3 bound the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD with apparent dissociation constants, Kd, of 250, 290, and 970 nM, respectively (Figure B). The consensus peptide 4 bound the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD with Kd = 80 nM, a ∼3-fold improvement over the originally identified hit peptide 1 (Figure B). To determine whether the binding is sequence-specific, two scrambled variants of peptide 1 (sc1 and sc2) were prepared and tested by BLI, and no association was observed in either case (Figure C). We also tested the association of peptide 1 to 12ca5 and observed minimal association especially when compared directly to a known positive control 12ca5 binder (Figure S5). While peptide 4 had the highest affinity to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD, peptide 1 was the most soluble and was used for all further investigations. Peptide 1 associates to a specific site on the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD as determined by a self-competition binding assay. We immobilized peptide 1-biotin on BLI tips and dipped them into solutions containing SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and peptide 1 ([RBD] = 500 nM; [1] = 0–16 μM). With an increasing concentration of peptide 1 in solution, we observed a concentration-dependent decrease in binding. With less free RBD available in solution, less RBD associates to the BLI tip coated in peptide 1 (Figure C). Peptide 1 does not interfere with ACE2 binding to the RBD. For this experiment, we immobilized ACE2 on BLI tips and dipped them into solutions of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and peptide 1 ([RBD] = 100 nM; [1] = 0–62 μM, Figure S6). We did not observe a decrease in binding response. This can be explained by the fact that peptide 1 does not have sufficient affinity to block binding of RBD to ACE2 or that peptide 1 might bind to a site on the RBD separate from ACE2. In the latter case, ACE2 and peptide 1-biotin might form an orthogonal ligand pair useful for spike-RBD sandwich immunoassays. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of sequence 1 was used to determine the importance of the common motif (*V*GL) and other residues in binding to RBD (Figure ). Mutations V2A and G4A decreased binding to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD, confirming their contributions to the motif identified (Figure ). Mutations of hydrophobic residues reduced the peptide binding affinity. Specifically, the mutants F3A, L5A, and W8A decreased the binding by 5- to 13-fold. Position 3 in the other identified peptides contained a methionine suggesting that a hydrophobic residue is important at this site. Similarly, position 8 needs to be either tryptophan or tyrosine, indicating that an aromatic group is important.
Figure 2

Alanine scanning and sequence truncations of 1 reveal binding hotspots. Binding to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD of alanine mutants and truncated peptides was measured by BLI as detailed in Figure . Ratios between binding of original sequence 1 and each mutant, respectively, are shown as green bars. Individual steady state Kd values are shown in the right column. Kinetic binding results are reported in Table S1.

Alanine scanning and sequence truncations of 1 reveal binding hotspots. Binding to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD of alanine mutants and truncated peptides was measured by BLI as detailed in Figure . Ratios between binding of original sequence 1 and each mutant, respectively, are shown as green bars. Individual steady state Kd values are shown in the right column. Kinetic binding results are reported in Table S1. To assess the importance of sequence length, we synthesized N-terminal and C-terminal truncations of peptide 1. A one residue truncation from the N-terminus abolished binding, confirming the frame dependency of the binding motif. N-terminal acetylation reduced the binding affinity to Kd = 520 nM, indicating that the N-terminal amino group is important. Truncations from the C-terminus decreased binding ∼10-fold. Peptide 1 binds to the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV coronaviruses. Patient-derived antibodies often bind SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 selectively, with less binding activity against MERS-CoV.[30] However, the spike protein shares some degree of sequence and structural similarity among several species of the β-coronavirus family.[31] We tested the binding of peptide 1 to the RBDs of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV and observed a Kd of 600 and 120 nM, respectively (Figure A). The Kd values are the same order of magnitude as the binding of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD.
Figure 3

Peptide 1 binds to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD. (A) The binding of peptide 1-biotin to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was determined by BLI. (B) A structural overlay of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was performed with the software PyMol (using PDB structures 6vw1 and 6c6z). Regions with the homology of the secondary structure between the two proteins are colored in red. The homologous regions were manually analyzed to identify positions with identical residues in both proteins: blue. Since peptide 1-biotin binds to both with comparable affinity, the binding site could potentially be in a region with high homology.

Peptide 1 binds to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD. (A) The binding of peptide 1-biotin to SARS-CoV-1-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was determined by BLI. (B) A structural overlay of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and MERS-CoV-spike-RBD was performed with the software PyMol (using PDB structures 6vw1 and 6c6z). Regions with the homology of the secondary structure between the two proteins are colored in red. The homologous regions were manually analyzed to identify positions with identical residues in both proteins: blue. Since peptide 1-biotin binds to both with comparable affinity, the binding site could potentially be in a region with high homology. We also investigated the binding of peptide 1 to the spike protein of HKU1, which is an endemic human coronavirus.[30,32] Since the receptor-binding domain of this protein was not commercially available, we compared the binding of peptide 1 to the HKU1 spike S1 protein subunit and to the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein subunit (both expressed in mammalian cells). The binding of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-S1 demonstrated a Kd of 40 nM but showed considerably weaker association to the HKU1-S1 protein (Figure S7). The stronger binding affinity of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-S1 (40 nM) compared to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (250 nM) could arise from reduced conformational freedom of the RBD as a part of the S1 spike protein compared to the RBD alone. Alternatively, the difference could be explained by potential variability in quality of recombinant expression of the different commercial proteins. In addition, we confirmed binding of peptide 1-biotin to the SARS-CoV-2-spike trimer (Figure S7). The association intensity (comparable to the one determined using ACE2-biotin) shows that peptide 1-biotin can bind also the full length SARS-CoV-2-spike trimer. Significant binding was observed with MERS-CoV and peptide 1, suggesting that a similar binding site might be recognized. We were intrigued by the retained binding affinity of peptide 1 to MERS-CoV as SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV RBDs have a high level of structural homology. On a residue level, however, only SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 share a high level of sequence homology (∼74%) while MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBDs share only ∼24%. Analyzing the overlay of these proteins via PyMOL, we found only two patches with residue homology large enough to associate with a peptide binder (colored in blue in Figure B, sequence alignment in Figure S12). One of these patches is located in proximity to the ACE2 binding site and the other on the opposite side of the RBD. Since no perturbation of the ACE2 binding to RBD was observed in the presence of peptide 1, the patch on the opposite side of the RBD is suggested as a possible binding site for peptide 1. SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD can be selectively enriched from human serum proteins using immobilized peptide 1. To investigate the binding specificity of 1 to RBD in a biological matrix, we added SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD to human serum (10% in 1× PBS) and incubated with magnetic beads displaying peptide 1-biotin (Figure A). We removed the supernatant, washed the beads, and treated with urea to elute bound proteins. We analyzed the urea fraction by SDS-PAGE and observed selective enrichment of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD; no other proteins were detected (Figure B). The selective binding of peptide 1 to SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD and isolation from complex biological media point toward potential diagnostic applications or the use of this peptide as a delivery agent for antiviral payloads.
Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD can be selectively enriched from human serum proteins. (A) Schematic representation of the pull-down of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD from human serum. (B) Workflow: spike RBD was added to human serum (RBD: 0.27 mg/mL, 10% human serum, 1× PBS), and the mix was incubated with magnetic beads (MyOne Dynabeads) displaying peptide 1-biotin (1 h, 4 °C). The supernatant (containing nonbinding proteins) was removed, and the beads were washed with 1× PBS (3 × 1 mL). Bound proteins were eluted with 6 M urea (elution 1:50 μL, 30 s; elution 2:50 μL, 120 s) and analyzed by SDS PAGE (C). The gel shows (from left to right) (1) molecular weight ladder; (2) purified SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (1 μg); (3) human serum mixed with SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD; (4) elution 1 (30 μL of elution sample 1); and (5) elution 2 (30 μL of elution sample 2). The analysis was performed using BoltTM 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gels (10-wells), 165 V for 36 min, utilizing prestained Invitrogen SeeBlueTM Plus2 molecular weight standard with BoltTM LDS sample buffer (4×).

SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD can be selectively enriched from human serum proteins. (A) Schematic representation of the pull-down of SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD from human serum. (B) Workflow: spike RBD was added to human serum (RBD: 0.27 mg/mL, 10% human serum, 1× PBS), and the mix was incubated with magnetic beads (MyOne Dynabeads) displaying peptide 1-biotin (1 h, 4 °C). The supernatant (containing nonbinding proteins) was removed, and the beads were washed with 1× PBS (3 × 1 mL). Bound proteins were eluted with 6 M urea (elution 1:50 μL, 30 s; elution 2:50 μL, 120 s) and analyzed by SDS PAGE (C). The gel shows (from left to right) (1) molecular weight ladder; (2) purified SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD (1 μg); (3) human serum mixed with SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD; (4) elution 1 (30 μL of elution sample 1); and (5) elution 2 (30 μL of elution sample 2). The analysis was performed using BoltTM 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus gels (10-wells), 165 V for 36 min, utilizing prestained Invitrogen SeeBlueTM Plus2 molecular weight standard with BoltTM LDS sample buffer (4×). Nanomolar to picomolar concentrations of RBD in a biological matrix were detected by peptide 1-biotin in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format. We performed an ELISA by immobilizing different concentrations of RBD (100 nM to 100 fM) mixed with fetal bovine serum (FBS) onto the ELISA plate. We then added peptide 1-biotin (100 nM) to each well and subsequently streptavidin-HRP (horseradish peroxidase) and tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (Figure A). We detected SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD at 100 nM and 100 pM concentrations with a signal significantly stronger than the background (Figure B and Figure S10). Initial experiments with SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD dissolved in human serum also resulted in a dose response detection with a significant signal at a nanomolar RBD concentration (Figure S11). The background signal caused by the peptide in absence of RBD on the plate could be caused by nonspecific binding of peptide 1-biotin to components of the biological matrix. For a potential use as a diagnostic tool, further refinement of the detection conditions will be necessary. We tested the stability of peptide 1-biotin in human serum and found minimal degradation in conditions comparable to the ELISA (Figure S13).
Figure 5

Picomolar SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD quantities were detected by ELISA. (A) Schematic representation of the ELISA assay. (B) Workflow: Serial dilutions (100 nM to 100 fM) of RBD mixed with fetal bovine serum (FBS) were immobilized on an ELISA plate. The plate was incubated with peptide 1-biotin, followed by streptavidin-HRP and TMB substrate. (C) ELISA absorbance readout at 450 nM as a function of RBD concentrations. Measurements were performed in technical triplicates (n = 3), and statistical significance was calculated with the unpaired t test. RBD 100 nM vs no RBD, p = 0.0012 (**); RBD 100 pM vs no RBD, p = 0.018 (*).

Picomolar SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD quantities were detected by ELISA. (A) Schematic representation of the ELISA assay. (B) Workflow: Serial dilutions (100 nM to 100 fM) of RBD mixed with fetal bovine serum (FBS) were immobilized on an ELISA plate. The plate was incubated with peptide 1-biotin, followed by streptavidin-HRP and TMB substrate. (C) ELISA absorbance readout at 450 nM as a function of RBD concentrations. Measurements were performed in technical triplicates (n = 3), and statistical significance was calculated with the unpaired t test. RBD 100 nM vs no RBD, p = 0.0012 (**); RBD 100 pM vs no RBD, p = 0.018 (*).

Safety Statement

No unexpected or unusually high safety hazards were encountered.

Concluding Remarks

Taken together, we have shown the use of an affinity selection–mass spectrometry platform[27] for the rapid discovery of peptides binding to the SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD. From 800 million synthetic peptides screened, we identified three motif-bearing sequences that have nanomolar affinity. These peptides bind SARS-CoV-2-spike-RBD with selectivity over multiple human serum proteins and could detect it at nanomolar to picomolar concentrations in an ELISA format. Cross-binding of peptide 1 to the MERS-CoV coronavirus spike protein indicated a possible binding site distal from the binding site for the human ACE2 receptor. The peptides reported here are potential starting points for the development of affinity-based diagnostic tools.[33−35] High-affinity reagents without direct competition activity for native receptors could be used for virus-directed delivery of antiviral payloads, or for the development of proteasome or lysosome targeting chimeras (PROTACs[36,37] and LYTACs[38]). Adapting peptide 1 to a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay or a similar assay could improve its sensitivity for detection of SARS-CoV-2.[8,39] Because of its selectivity in biological media, peptide 1 could be utilized for the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 in bodily fluids. Improved diagnostics are a topic of intense COVID-19 research as they may provide rapid, reliable, and early detection.[40] While direct detection suffers from low sensitivity,[10,41] the rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for patient contact tracing, identifying hosts, and epidemiologic studies.[2−4] The peptides discovered by our platform may provide a useful SARS-CoV-2 detection modality to help achieve these goals.
  35 in total

Review 1.  The novel human coronaviruses NL63 and HKU1.

Authors:  Krzysztof Pyrc; Ben Berkhout; Lia van der Hoek
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Targeted protein degradation: elements of PROTAC design.

Authors:  Stacey-Lynn Paiva; Craig M Crews
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 3.  Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins.

Authors:  Fang Li
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 10.431

4.  Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2.

Authors:  Qihui Wang; Yanfang Zhang; Lili Wu; Sheng Niu; Chunli Song; Zengyuan Zhang; Guangwen Lu; Chengpeng Qiao; Yu Hu; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Qisheng Wang; Huan Zhou; Jinghua Yan; Jianxun Qi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Targeted intracellular degradation of SARS-CoV-2 via computationally optimized peptide fusions.

Authors:  Pranam Chatterjee; Manvitha Ponnapati; Christian Kramme; Alexandru M Plesa; George M Church; Joseph M Jacobson
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-11-23

6.  Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Specific Antibody Responses in Coronavirus Disease Patients.

Authors:  Nisreen M A Okba; Marcel A Müller; Wentao Li; Chunyan Wang; Corine H GeurtsvanKessel; Victor M Corman; Mart M Lamers; Reina S Sikkema; Erwin de Bruin; Felicity D Chandler; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Quentin Le Hingrat; Diane Descamps; Nadhira Houhou-Fidouh; Chantal B E M Reusken; Berend-Jan Bosch; Christian Drosten; Marion P G Koopmans; Bart L Haagmans
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Structural Basis for Potent Neutralization of Betacoronaviruses by Single-Domain Camelid Antibodies.

Authors:  Daniel Wrapp; Dorien De Vlieger; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Gretel M Torres; Nianshuang Wang; Wander Van Breedam; Kenny Roose; Loes van Schie; Markus Hoffmann; Stefan Pöhlmann; Barney S Graham; Nico Callewaert; Bert Schepens; Xavier Saelens; Jason S McLellan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Identification of critical determinants on ACE2 for SARS-CoV entry and development of a potent entry inhibitor.

Authors:  Dong P Han; Adam Penn-Nicholson; Michael W Cho
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Computational Design of ACE2-Based Peptide Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Yanxiao Han; Petr Král
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion.

Authors:  Shuai Xia; Meiqin Liu; Chao Wang; Wei Xu; Qiaoshuai Lan; Siliang Feng; Feifei Qi; Linlin Bao; Lanying Du; Shuwen Liu; Chuan Qin; Fei Sun; Zhengli Shi; Yun Zhu; Shibo Jiang; Lu Lu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 25.617

View more
  18 in total

1.  Lysine-Targeted Reversible Covalent Ligand Discovery for Proteins via Phage Display.

Authors:  Mengmeng Zheng; Fa-Jie Chen; Kaicheng Li; Rahi M Reja; Fredrik Haeffner; Jianmin Gao
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 16.383

2.  Peptide-Antibody Fusions Engineered by Phage Display Exhibit an Ultrapotent and Broad Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Variants.

Authors:  Jonathan M Labriola; Shane Miersch; Gang Chen; Chao Chen; Alevtina Pavlenco; Reza Saberianfar; Francesca Caccuri; Alberto Zani; Nitin Sharma; Annie Feng; Daisy W Leung; Arnaldo Caruso; Giuseppe Novelli; Gaya K Amarasinghe; Sachdev S Sidhu
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Peptide Binder with High-Affinity for the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain.

Authors:  Lanlan Yu; Ruonan Wang; Tao Wen; Lei Liu; Tao Wang; Shuli Liu; Haiyan Xu; Chenxuan Wang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 10.383

4.  Advances in Magnetic Microbead Affinity Selection Screening: Discovery of Natural Ligands to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein.

Authors:  Ruth N Muchiri; James Kibitel; Margaret A Redick; Richard B van Breemen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.262

Review 5.  Peptide-Based Inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.

Authors:  Disha Panchal; Jeena Kataria; Kamiya Patel; Kaytlyn Crowe; Varun Pai; Abdul-Rahman Azizogli; Neil Kadian; Sreya Sanyal; Abhishek Roy; Joseph Dodd-O; Amanda M Acevedo-Jake; Vivek A Kumar
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2021-08-06

6.  Phage Display-Derived Peptide for the Specific Binding of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Li Liu; Pierre Fernand Neuenschwander; Steven Idell; Ramakrishna Vankayalapati; Krishan Gopal Jain; Ke Du; Honglong Ji; Guohua Yi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-29

7.  Blocking SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) Spike Protein Receptor-Binding Domain Binding with the ACE2 Receptor of the Host Cell and Inhibiting Virus Infections Using Human Host Defense Peptide-Conjugated Graphene Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Avijit Pramanik; Poonam C Sharma; Shamily Patibandla; Ye Gao; Vinod Ruppa-Kasani; Jagruti Goli; Animesh Kumar; Abhirup Chatterjee; Sudarson Sekhar Sinha; John T Bates; Michael A Bierdeman; Ritesh Tandon; Paresh Chandra Ray
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-02-22

8.  Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 Protein Response on PI3K-Mediated IL-8 Release.

Authors:  Christina Borchers; Anita Thyagarajan; Christine M Rapp; Jeffrey B Travers; Ravi P Sahu
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Aptamer Sandwich Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Antigen.

Authors:  Marketa Svobodova; Vasso Skouridou; Miriam Jauset-Rubio; Irene Viéitez; Alberto Fernández-Villar; Jorge Julio Cabrera Alvargonzalez; Eva Poveda; Clara Benavent Bofill; Teresa Sans; Abdulaziz Bashammakh; Abdulrahman O Alyoubi; Ciara K O'Sullivan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 10.  Targeting the SARS-CoV-2-spike protein: from antibodies to miniproteins and peptides.

Authors:  Sebastian Pomplun
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2020-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.