Literature DB >> 33525503

Stimulus Control of Odorant Concentration: Pilot Study of Generalization and Discrimination of Odor Concentration in Canines.

Mallory T DeChant1, Paul C Bunker2, Nathaniel J Hall1.   

Abstract

Despite dogs' widespread use as detection systems, little is known about how dogs generalize to variations of an odorant's concentration. Further, it is unclear whether dogs can be trained to discriminate between similar concentration variations of an odorant. Four dogs were trained to an odorant (0.01 air dilution of isoamyl acetate) in an air-dilution olfactometer, and we assessed spontaneous generalization to a range of concentrations lower than the training stimulus (Generalization Test 1). Dogs generalized to odors within a 10-fold range of the training odorant. Next, we conducted discrimination training to suppress responses to concentrations lower than a concentration dogs showed initial responding towards in Generalization Test 1 (0.0025 air dilution). Dogs successfully discriminated between 0.0025 and 0.01, exceeding 90% accuracy. However, when a second generalization test was conducted (Generalization Test 2), responding at the 0.0025 concentration immediately recovered and was no different than in Generalization Test 1. Dogs were then tested in another generalization test (Compound Discrimination and Generalization) in which generalization probes were embedded within discrimination trials, and dogs showed suppression of responding to the 0.0025 concentration and lower concentrations in this preparation. These data suggest dogs show limited spontaneous generalization across odor concentration and that dogs can be trained to discriminate between similar concentrations of the same odorant. Stimulus control, however, may depend on the negative stimulus, suggesting olfactory concentration generalization may depend on relative stimulus control. These results highlight the importance of considering odor concentration as a dimension for generalization in canine olfactory research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  canine detection; concentration generalization; odor discrimination

Year:  2021        PMID: 33525503      PMCID: PMC7912023          DOI: 10.3390/ani11020326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  20 in total

1.  Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans.

Authors:  M Laska; D Freyer
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Variation in complex olfactory stimuli and its influence on odour recognition.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wrigh; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Quantifying Search Dog Effectiveness in a Terrestrial Search and Rescue Environment.

Authors:  Ian Greatbatch; Rebecca J Gosling; Sophie Allen
Journal:  Wilderness Environ Med       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 1.518

5.  Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic ketones and acetic esters.

Authors:  M Laska; F Hübener
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Olfactory discrimination and generalization of ammonium nitrate and structurally related odorants in Labrador retrievers.

Authors:  Lucia Lazarowski; Melanie L Foster; Margaret E Gruen; Barbara L Sherman; Richard E Fish; Norton W Milgram; David C Dorman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Venkata Anupama Narla; Karim Boudadi
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers.

Authors:  Michael McCulloch; Tadeusz Jezierski; Michael Broffman; Alan Hubbard; Kirk Turner; Teresa Janecki
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.279

9.  The use of canines in the detection of human cancers.

Authors:  Robert T Gordon; Carole Beck Schatz; Lawrence J Myers; Michael Kosty; Constance Gonczy; Joan Kroener; Michael Tran; Pamela Kurtzhals; Susan Heath; James A Koziol; Nan Arthur; Madeline Gabriel; Judy Hemping; Gordon Hemping; Sally Nesbitt; Lydia Tucker-Clark; Jennifer Zaayer
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.579

10.  Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario.

Authors:  Astrid R Concha; Claire M Guest; Rob Harris; Thomas W Pike; Alexandre Feugier; Helen Zulch; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-01-22
View more
  2 in total

1.  The use of an intermittent schedule of reinforcement to evaluate detection dogs' generalization from smokeless-powder.

Authors:  Edgar O Aviles-Rosa; Lauren S Fernandez; Courtney Collins-Pisano; Paola A Prada-Tiedemann; Nathaniel J Hall
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Case Study: An Evaluation of Detection Dog Generalization to a Large Quantity of an Unknown Explosive in the Field.

Authors:  Edgar O Aviles-Rosa; Gordon McGuinness; Nathaniel J Hall
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.