Literature DB >> 9279468

Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans.

M Laska1, D Freyer.   

Abstract

Using a behavioral paradigm designed to simulate olfactory-guided foraging, the ability of five squirrel monkeys to distinguish iso-amyl acetate from n- and iso-forms of other acetic esters (ethyl acetate to decyl acetate) and from other esters carrying the iso-amyl group (iso-amyl propionate to iso-amyl capronate) was investigated. We found (i) that all five animals were clearly able to discriminate between all odor pairs tested; (ii) a significant negative correlation between discrimination performance and structural similarity of odorants in terms of differences in carbon chain length of both the aliphatic alcohol group and the aliphatic acid group of the esters; and (iii) that iso- and n-amyl acetate were perceived as qualitatively similar despite different steric conformation. Using a triple-forced choice procedure, 20 human subjects were tested on the same tasks in parallel and showed a very similar pattern of discrimination performance compared with the squirrel monkeys. Thus, the results of this study provide evidence of well-developed olfactory discrimination ability in squirrel monkeys for aliphatic esters and support the assumption that human and non-human primates may share common principles of odor quality perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9279468     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/22.4.457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  15 in total

1.  Two minds about odors.

Authors:  Leslie M Kay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Olfactory discrimination of aliphatic odorants at 1 ppm: too easy for CD-1 mice to show odor structure-activity relationships?

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Asa Rosandher; Sara Hommen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Food avoidance learning in squirrel monkeys and common marmosets.

Authors:  M Laska; K Metzker
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Are mammal olfactory signals hiding right under our noses?

Authors:  Peter James Apps
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-05-15

5.  Selecting between iron-rich and clay-rich soils: a geophagy field experiment with black-and-white colobus monkeys in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda.

Authors:  Paula A Pebsworth; Thibaud Gruber; Joshua D Miller; Klaus Zuberbühler; Sera L Young
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  The frequency of occurrence of acyclic monoterpene alcohols in the chemical environment does not determine olfactory sensitivity in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Daniela Höfelmann; Diana Huber; Marie Schumacher
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Differential responses to branched and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons in the rat olfactory system.

Authors:  Sabrina L Ho; Brett A Johnson; Andrew L Chen; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 8.  Functional neuronal processing of human body odors.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Vitam Horm       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 9.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic aldehydes in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques.

Authors:  M Laska; M Hofmann; Y Simon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.