Literature DB >> 33525405

Genetic Background and Inbreeding Depression in Romosinuano Cattle Breed in Mexico.

Jorge Hidalgo1, Alberto Cesarani1, Andre Garcia1, Pattarapol Sumreddee2, Neon Larios3, Enrico Mancin4, José Guadalupe García3, Rafael Núñez3, Rodolfo Ramírez3.   

Abstract

The ultimate goal of genetic selection is to improve genetic progress by increasing favorable alleles in the population. However, with selection, homozygosity, and potentially harmful recessive alleles can accumulate, deteriorating genetic variability and hampering continued genetic progress. Such potential adverse side effects of selection are of particular interest in populations with a small effective population size like the Romosinuano beef cattle in Mexico. The objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic background and inbreeding depression in Mexican Romosinuano cattle using pedigree and genomic information. Inbreeding was estimated using pedigree (FPED) and genomic information based on the genomic relationship matrix (FGRM) and runs of homozygosity (FROH) of different length classes. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was evaluated using the correlation between pairs of loci, and the effective population size (Ne) was calculated based on LD and pedigree information. The pedigree file consisted of 4875 animals born between 1950 and 2019, of which 71 had genotypes. LD decreased with the increase in distance between markers, and Ne estimated using genomic information decreased from 610 to 72 animals (from 109 to 1 generation ago), the Ne estimated using pedigree information was 86.44. The reduction in effective population size implies the existence of genetic bottlenecks and the decline of genetic diversity due to the intensive use of few individuals as parents of the next generations. The number of runs of homozygosity per animal ranged between 18 and 102 segments with an average of 55. The shortest and longest segments were 1.0 and 36.0 Mb long, respectively, reflecting ancient and recent inbreeding. The average inbreeding was 2.98 ± 2.81, 2.98 ± 4.01, and 7.28 ± 3.68% for FPED, FGRM, and FROH, respectively. The correlation between FPED and FGRM was -0.25, and the correlations among FPED and FROH of different length classes were low (from 0.16 to 0.31). The correlations between FGRM and FROH of different length classes were moderate (from 0.44 to 0.58), indicating better agreement. A 1% increase in population inbreeding decreased birth weight by 0.103 kg and weaning weight by 0.685 kg. A strategy such as optimum genetic contributions to maximize selection response and manage the long-term genetic variability and inbreeding could lead to more sustainable breeding programs for the Mexican Romosinuano beef cattle breed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Romosinuano; autozygosity; effective population size; inbreeding; inbreeding depression; runs of homozygosity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33525405      PMCID: PMC7911603          DOI: 10.3390/ani11020321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  42 in total

1.  A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information.

Authors:  J P Gutiérrez; F Goyache
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Pedigree analysis of eight Spanish beef cattle breeds.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Gutiérrez; Juan Altarriba; Clara Díaz; Raquel Quintanilla; Javier Cañón; Jesús Piedrafita
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America.

Authors:  M Sargolzaei; F S Schenkel; G B Jansen; L R Schaeffer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Novel multilocus measure of linkage disequilibrium to estimate past effective population size.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Peter M Visscher; Helen C McPartlan; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Estimation of historical effective population size using linkage disequilibria with marker data.

Authors:  L J Corbin; A Y H Liu; S C Bishop; J A Woolliams
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data.

Authors:  Mario Barbato; Pablo Orozco-terWengel; Miika Tapio; Michael W Bruford
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle.

Authors:  Deirdre C Purfield; Donagh P Berry; Sinead McParland; Daniel G Bradley
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.797

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Association Studies, Runs of Homozygosity Analysis, and Copy Number Variation Detection to Identify Reproduction-Related Genes in Bama Xiang Pigs.

Authors:  Jiayuan Mo; Yujie Lu; Siran Zhu; Lingli Feng; Wenjing Qi; Xingfa Chen; Bingkun Xie; Baojian Chen; Ganqiu Lan; Jing Liang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Process of Introduction of Australian Braford Cattle to South America: Configuration of Population Structure and Genetic Diversity Evolution.

Authors:  Araceli Rocío Marisel González; Francisco Javier Navas González; Gustavo Ángel Crudeli; Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo; María Esperanza Camacho Vallejo; Celia Raquel Quirino
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.