Literature DB >> 33525050

Dual-storage phosphor proton therapy dosimetry: Simultaneous quantification of dose and linear energy transfer.

Jufri Setianegara1,2, Thomas R Mazur1, Deshan Yang1, H Harold Li1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of using the high Zeff storage phosphor material BaFBrI:Eu2+ in conjunction with the low Zeff storage phosphor material KCl:Eu2+ for simultaneous proton dose and linear energy transfer (LET) measurements by (a) measuring the fundamental optical and dosimetric properties of BaFBrI:Eu2+ , (b) evaluating its compatibility in being readout simultaneously with KCl:Eu2+ dosimeters, and (c) modeling and validating its LET dependence under elevated proton LET irradiation.
METHODS: A commercial BaFBrI:Eu2+ storage phosphor detector (Model ST-VI, Fujifilm) was characterized with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis to obtain its elemental composition. The dosimeters were irradiated using both a Mevion S250 proton therapy unit (at the center of a spread-out Bragg peak, SOBP) and a Varian Clinac iX linear accelerator with the latter being a low LET irradiation. The photostimulated luminescence (PSL) emission spectra, excitation spectra, and luminescent lifetimes of the detector were measured after proton and photon irradiations. Dosimetric properties including dose linearity, dose rate dependence, radiation hardness, temporal, and readout stabilities were studied using a laboratory optical reader after proton irradiations. In addition, its proton energy dependence was analytically modeled and experimentally validated by irradiating the detectors at various depths within the SOBP (Range: 15.0 g/cm2 , Modulation: 10.0 g/cm2 ).
RESULTS: The active detector composition for the high Zeff storage phosphor detector was found to be BaFBr0.85 I0.15 :Eu2+ . The BaFBr0.85 I0.15 :Eu2+ material's excitation and emission spectra were in agreement under proton and photon irradiations, with peaks of 586 ± 1 nm and 400 ± 1 nm, respectively, with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 119 ± 3 nm and 30 ± 2 nm, respectively. As dosimeter response under photon irradiation is generally believed to be free from LET effect, these results suggest LET independence of charge storage center types resulted from ionizing radiations. There is sufficient spectral overlaps with KCl:Eu2+ dosimeters allowing both dosimeters to be readout under equivalent readout conditions, that is, 594 nm stimulation and 420 nm detection wavelengths. Its PSL characteristic lifetime was found to be less than 5 microseconds which would make it suitable for fast 2D readout post irradiation. Its 420 nm emission band intensity was found to be linear up to 10 Gy absolute proton dose under the same irradiation conditions, dose rate independent, stable in time and under multiple readouts, and with high radiation hardness under cumulative proton dose histories up to 200 Gy as tested in this study. BaFBr0.85 I0.15 :Eu2+ showed significant proton energy-dependent dose under-response in regions of high LET which could be modeled by stopping power ratio calculations with an accuracy of 3% in low LET regions and a distance-to-agreement (DTA) of 1 mm in high LET regions (>5 keV/μm).
CONCLUSION: We have proven the feasibility of dual-storage phosphor proton dosimetry for simultaneous proton dose and LET measurements. BaFBr0.85 I0.15 :Eu2+ has shown equally excellent dosimetry performance as its low Zeff complement KCl:Eu2+ with distinctive LET dependence merely as a result of its higher Zeff . These promising results pave the way for future studies involving simultaneous proton dose and LET measurements using this novel approach.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  linear energy transfer; proton therapy dosimetry; storage phosphor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33525050      PMCID: PMC8058281          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  43 in total

1.  Robust commercial diffuse reflector for UV-VIS-NIR applications.

Authors:  John D Mason; Michael T Cone; Matthew Donelon; Jeffery C Wigle; Gary D Noojin; Edward S Fry
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Dose-volume comparison of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Vargas; Amber Fryer; Chaitali Mahajan; Daniel Indelicato; David Horne; Angela Chellini; Craig McKenzie; Paula Lawlor; Randal Henderson; Zuofeng Li; Liyong Lin; Kenneth Olivier; Sameer Keole
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Dose response of BaFBrl: Eu2+ storage phosphor plates exposed to megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  H Harold Li; Albin L Gonzalez; Huaying Ji; Dennis M Duggan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Creating a spread-out Bragg peak in proton beams.

Authors:  David Jette; Weimin Chen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Azin Khabazian; Pablo P Yepes; Gino Lim; Falk Poenisch; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Correction of stopping power and LET quenching for radiophotoluminescent glass dosimetry in a therapeutic proton beam.

Authors:  Weishan Chang; Yusuke Koba; Tetsurou Katayose; Keisuke Yasui; Chihiro Omachi; Masatsugu Hariu; Hidetoshi Saitoh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.

Authors:  Drosoula Giantsoudi; Clemens Grassberger; David Craft; Andrzej Niemierko; Alexei Trofimov; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - A case matched analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Blanchard; Adam S Garden; G Brandon Gunn; David I Rosenthal; William H Morrison; Mike Hernandez; Joseph Crutison; Jack J Lee; Rong Ye; C David Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Kate A Hutcheson; Emma B Holliday; Nikhil G Thaker; Erich M Sturgis; Merrill S Kies; X Ronald Zhu; Radhe Mohan; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Radiographic film dosimetry of proton beams for depth-dose constancy check and beam profile measurement.

Authors:  Inhwan J Yeo; Anthony Teran; Abiel Ghebremedhin; Matt Johnson; Baldev Patyal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improved simultaneous LET and dose measurements in proton therapy.

Authors:  Jeppe Brage Christensen; Michele Togno; Lily Bossin; Oskari Ville Pakari; Sairos Safai; Eduardo Gardenali Yukihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Development of a storage phosphor imaging system for proton pencil beam spot profile determination.

Authors:  Jufri Setianegara; Thomas R Mazur; Yao Hao; Deshan Yang; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.