Literature DB >> 33524024

Femoral neck strain prediction during level walking using a combined musculoskeletal and finite element model approach.

Zainab Altai1,2, Erica Montefiori1,2, Bart van Veen1,2, Margaret A Paggiosi2,3, Eugene V McCloskey2,3, Marco Viceconti4,5, Claudia Mazzà1,2, Xinshan Li1,2,3.   

Abstract

Recently, coupled musculoskeletal-finite element modelling approaches have emerged as a way to investigate femoral neck loading during various daily activities. Combining personalised gait data with finite element models will not only allow us to study changes in motion/movement, but also their effects on critical internal structures, such as the femur. However, previous studies have been hampered by the small sample size and the lack of fully personalised data in order to construct the coupled model. Therefore, the aim of this study was to build a pipeline for a fully personalised multiscale (body-organ level) model to investigate the strain levels at the femoral neck during a normal gait cycle. Five postmenopausal women were included in this study. The CT and MRI scans of the lower limb, and gait data were collected for all participants. Muscle forces derived from the body level musculoskeletal models were used as boundary constraints on the finite element femur models. Principal strains were estimated at the femoral neck region during a full gait cycle. Considerable variation was found in the predicted peak strain among individuals with mean peak first principal strain of 0.24% ± 0.11% and mean third principal strain of -0.29% ± 0.24%. For four individuals, two overall peaks of the maximum strains were found to occur when both feet were in contact with the floor, while one individual had one peak at the toe-off phase. Both the joint contact forces and the muscular forces were found to substantially influence the loading at the femoral neck. A higher correlation was found between the predicted peak strains and the gluteus medius (R2 ranged between 0.95 and 0.99) than the hip joint contact forces (R2 ranged between 0.63 and 0.96). Therefore, the current findings suggest that personal variations are substantial, and hence it is important to consider multiple subjects before deriving general conclusions for a target population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33524024      PMCID: PMC7850486          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  60 in total

1.  Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; G Gualtieri; N Malavolta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Age-related differences in walking stability.

Authors:  Hylton B Menz; Stephen R Lord; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb.

Authors:  B W Stansfield; A C Nicol; J P Paul; I G Kelly; F Graichen; G Bergmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Femoral shaft strains during daily activities: Implications for atypical femoral fractures.

Authors:  Saulo Martelli; Peter Pivonka; Peter R Ebeling
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement.

Authors:  Scott L Delp; Frank C Anderson; Allison S Arnold; Peter Loan; Ayman Habib; Chand T John; Eran Guendelman; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population.

Authors:  Paul A Toogood; Anthony Skalak; Daniel R Cooperman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning.

Authors:  M Maruyama; J R Feinberg; W N Capello; J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.

Authors:  Cristina Falcinelli; Enrico Schileo; Luca Balistreri; Fabio Baruffaldi; Barbara Bordini; Marco Viceconti; Ugo Albisinni; Francesco Ceccarelli; Luigi Milandri; Aldo Toni; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Neuro-musculoskeletal flexible multibody simulation yields a framework for efficient bone failure risk assessment.

Authors:  Andreas Geier; Maeruan Kebbach; Ehsan Soodmand; Christoph Woernle; Daniel Kluess; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Walking speed-related changes in stride time variability: effects of decreased speed.

Authors:  Olivier Beauchet; Cedric Annweiler; Yhann Lecordroch; Gilles Allali; Veronique Dubost; François R Herrmann; Reto W Kressig
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improving the Hip Fracture Risk Prediction with a Statistical Shape-and-Intensity Model of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Alessandra Aldieri; Pinaki Bhattacharya; Margaret Paggiosi; Richard Eastell; Alberto Luigi Audenino; Cristina Bignardi; Umberto Morbiducci; Mara Terzini
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.