Literature DB >> 12757801

Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb.

B W Stansfield1, A C Nicol, J P Paul, I G Kelly, F Graichen, G Bergmann.   

Abstract

Characterisation of hip joint contact forces is essential for the definition of hip joint prosthesis design requirements. In vivo hip joint contact force measurements have been made using instrumented hip joint prostheses. However, to allow determination of the range of values of joint contact force and their directions relative to anatomical structures in a range of subject groups sufficient to form an agreed data base it is necessary to adopt a different approach without the use of an implanted transducer. The use of mathematical models of the lower limb to examine the forces in soft tissues and at the joints has provided valuable insight into internal loading conditions. Several authors have proposed mathematical musculo-skeletal models. However, there have been only limited attempts at validation of these models. It is possible to use the results of in vivo force measurements from instrumented prostheses to validate the results calculated using the mathematical models. In this study two subjects with instrumented hip joint prostheses were studied. Forces at the hip joints were calculated using a three-dimensional model of the leg. Walking at slow, normal and fast speeds (0.97-2.01m/s), weight transfer from two to one leg and back again, and sit to stand were studied. Direct comparisons were made between the 'gold standard' measured hip joint contact forces and the calculated forces. There was general agreement between the calculated and measured forces in both pattern and magnitude. There were, however, discrepancies. Reasons for these differences in results are discussed and possible model developments suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757801     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00072-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Normal and osteoarthritic hip joint mechanical behaviour: a comparison study.

Authors:  A Pustoc'h; L Cheze
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Probability-based prediction of activity in multiple arm muscles: implications for functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Chad V Anderson; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  Finite element analysis of the hip and spine based on quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Simple implantable wireless sensor platform to measure pressure and force.

Authors:  John F Drazan; Omar T Abdoun; Michael T Wassick; Reena Dahle; Luke Beardslee; George A Marcus; Nathaniel C Cady; Eric H Ledet
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Design of Optimal Treatments for Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders using Patient-Specific Multibody Dynamic Models.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Int J Comput Vis Biomech       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 9.  Implantable sensor technology: measuring bone and joint biomechanics of daily life in vivo.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Benjamin J Fregly; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Is lifelong knee joint force from work, home, and sport related to knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Charles R Ratzlaff; Mieke Koehoorn; Jolanda Cibere; Jacek A Kopec
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2012-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.