Literature DB >> 33520123

Secondary Piggyback Intraocular Lens for Management of Residual Ametropia after Cataract Surgery.

Zahra Karjou1, Mohammad-Reza Jafarinasab1, Mohammad-Hassan Seifi1, Kiana Hassanpour1, Bahareh Kheiri1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the indications, clinical outcomes, and complications of secondary piggyback intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery.
METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series, patients who had residual refractive error after cataract surgery and were candidates for secondary piggyback IOL implantation between June 2015 and September 2018 were included. All eyes underwent secondary IOL implantation with the piggyback technique in the ciliary sulcus. The types of IOLs included Sulcoflex and three-piece foldable acrylic lenses. Patients were followed-up for at least one year.
RESULTS: Eleven patients were included. Seven patients had hyperopic ametropia, and four patients had residual myopia after cataract surgery. The preoperative mean of absolute residual refractive error was 7.20 ± 7.92, which reached 0.42 ± 1.26 postoperatively (P < 0.001). The postoperative spherical equivalent was within ± 1 diopter of target refraction in all patients. The average preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.13 ± 0.35 LogMAR, which significantly improved to 0.41 ± 0.24 LogMAR postoperatively (P = 0.008). There were no intra- or postoperative complications during the 22.4 ± 9.5 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Secondary piggyback IOL implantation is an effective and safe technique for the correction of residual ametropia following cataract surgery. Three-piece IOLs can be safely placed as secondary piggyback IOLs in situations where specifically designed IOLs are not available.
Copyright © 2021 Karjou et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraocular Lens Implantation; Piggyback IOL Implantation; Residual Ametropia

Year:  2021        PMID: 33520123      PMCID: PMC7841270          DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v16i1.8244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res        ISSN: 2008-322X


  24 in total

Review 1.  Piggyback intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  James P Gills; Robert E Fenzl
Journal:  Dev Ophthalmol       Date:  2002

2.  Assessment of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL for piggyback sulcus fixation in pseudophakic cadaver eyes.

Authors:  J Steele McIntyre; Liliana Werner; Stanley R Fuller; Shaheen Cyrus Kavoussi; Mark Hill; Nick Mamalis
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

Authors:  J T Holladay; J P Gills; J Leidlein; M Cherchio
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Assessment of a new hydrophilic acrylic supplementary IOL for sulcus fixation in pseudophakic cadaver eyes.

Authors:  N Reiter; L Werner; J Guan; J Li; K T Tsaousis; N Mamalis; S Srinivasan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Elevated intraocular pressure in secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Takeshi Iwase; Nobushige Tanaka
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Pupillary block glaucoma associated with a secondary piggyback intraocular lens.

Authors:  Shane K Kim; Ralph C Lanciano; Michael E Sulewski
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Correction of undesirable pseudophakic refractive error with the Sulcoflex intraocular lens.

Authors:  Kevin Falzon; Owen G Stewart
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Piggybacking intraocular implants to correct pseudophakic refractive error.

Authors:  J L Gayton; V Sanders; M Van der Karr; M G Raanan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Primary piggyback implantation using the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens: case series.

Authors:  Leonardo Akaishi; Patrick F Tzelikis; Joyce Gondim; Rodrigo Vaz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Matched population comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens and standard LASIK for myopia of -3.00 to -7.88 diopters.

Authors:  Donald R Sanders
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of a Secondary Sulcus Intraocular Lens with an Extended Depth of Focus.

Authors:  Kjell Gunnar Gundersen; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.