Literature DB >> 33519251

Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors Among Adult Patients with Heart Failure in Wolaita Zone Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia.

Simegn Molla1, Mezgebu Yitayal2, Getasew Amare2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowing how heart failure affects patients' quality of life and its associated factors are crucial for a better patient-centred approach and management. Therefore, this study aims to assess health-related quality of life and its associated factors among adult heart failure patients in southern Ethiopia hospitals.
METHODS: The facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted in Wolaita zone governmental hospitals from March to April 2018. The population was all adult heart failure patients in the chronic illness follow-up clinic and inpatient department. All adult heart failure patients on follow-up clinic and inpatient departments who have at least a 6-month follow-up were included in the study. In contrast, patients who had chronic comorbidities were excluded from the study. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) tool was used to measure the outcome variable health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Interviews and client medical record reviews also collected socio-demographic, clinical and behavioural characteristics of participants. The data were analyzed using STATA version 14, and multiple linear regression analysis with P-value < 0.05 was used to measure the degree of association between HRQoL and independent variables.
RESULTS: A total of 372 patients participated in the study. The HRQoL score for the physical, emotional, and total were 22.2, 7.7, and 46.37, respectively. HRQoL was significantly associated with gender, age, family size, occupation, residency, and recent admission within the past six months, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, department of treatment, salt intake, and health perception.
CONCLUSION: Generally, the HRQoL for patients with heart failure was found to be low. Besides the variables age and gender of participants, family size, occupation, residency, admission history, salt intake, and NYHA class were significant factors for the HRQoL of patients with heart failure.
© 2021 Molla et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; Wolaita zone; health-related quality of life; heart failure

Year:  2021        PMID: 33519251      PMCID: PMC7837586          DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S288326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1179-1594


Background

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet its blood and oxygen.1 HF is a global public health problem which affects approximately 26 million people worldwide.2 Heart failure syndrome remains a significant public health issue for many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia.3 Global Burden of Disease report showed that heart failure is the top five Couse mortality in Ethiopia.4 The impact of HF on patients can be assessed using different approaches, like morbidity and mortality, even if recently using Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as a measurement tool also gets attention. HRQoL is an approach used to assess patients’ condition and well-being from their perspective by excluding those issues that have to directly linkage with health.5–11 Using HRQoL for HF patients helps detect the disease’s impact on their physical and emotional well-being, making it difficult to detect by using common clinical measurements. In recognition of this, HF management focuses on patient psychological support and HRQoL improvement.12–16 Heart failure affects all aspects of patients’ lives and leads to extreme physical, social, and functional debilitation and increases psychological distress17 and characterized by significantly reduced scores in all aspects of quality of life compared to a healthy reference group.18,19 Studies that used either a disease-specific instrument or a general HRQoL questionnaire have shown patients with heart failure reported lower scores in all domains of HRQoL.20–23 Different works of the literature showed that socio-demographic factors such as age, gender, educational status, and occupation significantly associate HRQoL among heart failure patients.24,25 Other studies also showed that clinical factors like NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and comorbidities are predictors of HRQoL.26,27 Despite different studies that have been done in Ethiopia regarding the prevalence and epidemiologic burden of heart failure, the effect of this public health problem on the quality of life parents is now well investigated. Since HF management’s primary objective is to improve the patients’ HRQoL,28 knowing the HRQoL of patients and the associated factors is very important for appropriate patient care, approach, and management. Therefore, this study was aimed to assess the HRQoL among patients with heart failure and its associated factors.

Methods

Study Design and Setting

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April 2018 at four governmental hospitals in Wolaita Zone, southern Ethiopia. In the Wolaita zone, there are four government hospitals to give around 1.5 million people. A total of 620 cardiac patients attended services at these hospitals as the outpatient department and inpatient department.

Study Population and Sampling Procedure

The population was all adult heart failure patients in the chronic illness follow up clinic and inpatient department. All adult heart failure patients on follow-up clinic and inpatient departments who have at least a 6-month follow-up were included in the study. In contrast, patients with chronic comorbidities (patients with diabetes mellitus and lung disease) were excluded from the study. The sample size was calculated using the mean estimation of the previous research done in Saudi Arabia29 using the mean estimation formula, and the final sample size was 388. A multistage sampling technique was used to select the study participants. A simple random sampling method was used to determine study units from the outpatient department, and consecutive sampling was used for patients from the inpatient ward.

Data Collection Tools and Procedures

The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with heart failure (HF) and validated in many countries worldwide.14,30,31 The MLHFQ is a disease-specific HRQoL assessment tool that provides scores for two dimensions, physical and emotional, and a total score. The questionnaire was first adopted in the English language and translated to the local language, then back-translated into English to keep its consistency. The socio-demographic factors (age, sex, marital status, education level, occupation, residence, ethnicity, religion, and wealth index) and clinical factors (NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of illness, recent admission) were included in the questionnaire. Besides, lifestyle (smoking, alcohol consumption, salt intake) and general health perception were also included in the questionnaire. Data on socio-demographics, lifestyle, and HRQoL were collected by trained interviewers, while some clinical data (comorbidities, complications, NYHA classes) were taken from patients’ medical records.

Operational Definitions

Health-Related Quality of Life

Which is the outcome variable, was measured using the MLHFQ instrument, which was developed specifically for measuring HRQoL among people with heart failure and has been validated in multi-cultural settings.32 It was a 21-items disease-specific measure of HRQoL, which has a total scale score of 105. MLHFQ reelects HF’s impact on HRQoL, from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0–105, from best to worst HRQoL), as well as scores for two dimensions, physical (8 items, range 0–40) and emotional (5 items, range 0–25). The other eight items (of the total of 21) are only considered to calculate the total score. Heart failure patients who score less than 24 are labelled as having (Good) HRQoL, 24–45 (Moderate), and greater than 45 as (Poor) HRQOL.33

Heart Failure

Patients are included in this study after being diagnosed and confirmed to have heart failure by physicians in the hospital. All selected hospitals use the same criteria to diagnose heart failure patients, which is called Framingham criteria. It is the most commonly used heart failure diagnosis criterion presenting heart failure with two major or one major and two minor criteria.34

Ejection Fraction (EF)

Is a measurement determining how well the heart pumps out blood and in diagnosing and tracking heart failure. A measurement using Echocardiogram (Echo) under 40% may be evidence of heart failure.35

Alcohol Consumption

Alcohol consumption was measured using Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST).36

ASSIST Total Score Risk Level

0–10 … … … … … … … … … … … Low-risk level 11–26 … … … … … … … … … …. Moderate risk level 27+ … … … … … … … … … … …. High-risk level

Smoking

It was measured using the World Health Organization Guidelines to control and monitor the tobacco epidemic.37 At the time of the survey, a smoker was smoking any tobacco product either daily or occasionally. A non-smoker was a person who, at the time of the study, was not smoking at all.

Salt Intake

A person who was using salt-containing food, even one meal, with in the last seven days, was considered as a user of salt.

Data Processing and Analysis

The collected data were checked for completeness. Then, codes were given to each question and entered into SPSS version 20 and exported to Stata version 14 for further analysis. A reliability test (Cronbach alpha) was performed to check the reliability of the items. The reliability (Cronbach alpha) for ASSIST was 0.89. The study also indicated that the total reliability was 0.92, for the physical dimension was 0.9, and for emotional dimension was 0.95. Summary statistics were done for the outcome and independent variables. Where an item was missing, the mean of other items in the domain was substituted. But when more than two items were missing from the domain. Model assumptions (normality, independence, equal variance, Multicollinearity, and linearity) were checked. Multiple linear regression was done, and variables with a P-value < of 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Study Participants

A total of 372 patients with heart failure participated in the study with a response rate of 95.9%. The mean age of study participants was 41.9 years. Among the study participants, 73%% were females, 56.7% protestant, 67.5% married, 45.2% housewives, 85% Wolaita, and 59.6% rural dwellers. The median family size was 6 (IQR=3) (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Patients with Heart Failure in Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372)

VariablesDescriptionFrequency (%)Mean ± SD
SexMale108 (29.03)
Female264 (70.97)
Age41.87 ± 21
ReligionProtestant211(56.72)
Orthodox107(28.76)
Catholic18 (4.84)
Muslim17 (4.57)
Others19 (5.11)
Marital statusMarried251(67.49)
Single68 (18.28)
Widowed39 (10.48)
Divorced14 (3.76)
OccupationHousewife161(43.28)
Farmer46 (12.37)
Student44 (11.83)
Merchant42 (11.29)
Government employee31(8.5)
Private employee11(2.96)
Unemployed9 (5.11)
Daily laborer7(1.88)
Retired4 (1.08)
Educational statusNo formal education189 (50.8)
Primary education68 (18.28)
Secondary education69 (18.55)
Preparatory9 (2.42)
College and university37(9.59)
ResidenceRural221(59.41)
Urban151(40.59)
EthnicityWolaita316 (84.95)
Gamo24 (6.45)
Kambata9 (2.42)
Others23 (6.8)
Family sizeMedian (IQR)=6(3)
Wealth statusPoor125 (33.6)
Medium125 (33.6)
Rich122 (33.8)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.

Socio-Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Patients with Heart Failure in Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372) Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.

Clinical/Medical Characteristics of Respondents

The majority (82.9%) of the participants were NHYA class 2 and above, and 76.34% had no history of recent admission within the past six months. The median (IQR) duration of illness month was [12 (IQR=23)], and the left ventricular ejection fraction was 55 (IQR=18). Almost 9 out of 10 (90.32%) patients were getting treatment in the outpatient department at the time of this study (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinical/Medical Characteristics of Study Participants in Wolaita Zone Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372)

VariablesDescriptionFrequency (%)Median (IQR)
Duration of illnessDuration in years1(1.92)
Duration in month12(23)
Admission within 6 monthsYes88 (23.66)
No284 (76.34)
NHYA classClass 162 (16.67)
Class 2169 (45.43)
Class 389 (23.92)
Class 452 (13.98)
Ejection fractionRecent ejection value55(18)
Department of treatmentOutpatient336 (90.32)
Inpatient/ward36 (9.68)

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

Clinical/Medical Characteristics of Study Participants in Wolaita Zone Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372) Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

Lifestyle/Behavioural Characteristics and Health Perception of Respondents

In this study, 6.7% of study participants were smokers, and 76.2% reported salt intake, 16% had a history of drinking alcohol within the past three months, and 62% were at a low-risk level. The study also revealed that 68.28% of respondents perceived their health as poor (Table 3).
Table 3

Behavioral/Lifestyle/Characteristics of Study Participants at Selected Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372)

VariablesDescriptionFrequency (%)
SmokingNon-smoker347(93.3)
Smoker25(6.7)
Salt intakeYes271(72.8)
No101(27.2)
AlcoholLow-risk level350(94.1)
Moderate risk level16(4.3)
High-risk level6(1.6)
Perception of healthPoor254(68.3)
Fair8(2.2)
Good110(29.5)
Behavioral/Lifestyle/Characteristics of Study Participants at Selected Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372)

Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Heart Failure

MLHFQ assessed Health-related Quality of life showed that the mean physical, emotional, and overall HRQoL was 22.2, 7.7, and 46.37. About 50% of the participants were assessed as having a poor quality of life-related to heart failure (Table 4).
Table 4

Health-Related Quality of Life of Study Participants at Selected Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372)

Domains of MLHFQMean ± SD95% CICronbach’s Alpha
Total MLHFQ score (range 0–105)46.4±20.6344.27,48.470.95
Physical dimension score (range 0–40)22.2±9.721.22,23.20.92
Emotional dimension score (range 0–25)7.7±5.37.19,8.20.90
Level of health-related Quality of lifeFrequencyRelative frequency
Good5815.6%
Moderate12834.4%
Poor18650%

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.

Health-Related Quality of Life of Study Participants at Selected Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372) Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.

Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life

The study revealed that sex, age, family size, occupation, residency, recent admission, NYHA, department of treatment, salt intake, and health perception were statistically significant variables associated with the total score of HRQoL. The final model explained 68% of the total MLHFQ scale variation. In this study, gender and salt intake were found to be statistically associated with the emotional dimension of HRQoL. Females and respondents who reported salt intake had a higher score of emotional dimensions HRQoL. Regarding the physical dimension, variables such as age, family size, occupation, residency, recent admission, and health perception were significantly associated with a p-value < 05. NYHA functional class and treatment department were significantly associated with physical and emotional dimensions and aggregate scores. Females had increase total HRQoL score by 4.3 (95% CI = 0.96, 7.7) and increased emotional HRQoL score by 2.45 (95% CI=1.33, 3.57) compared to men. As age increase by one year, the total HRQoL score increased by 0.1 (95% CI = 0.01, 0.14) and increased physical dimension HRQoL by 0.04 scores (95% CI=0.01, 0.08). As family size increase by one-person total HRQoL score decreased by 0.7 (95% CI=−1.21, −0.19) and decreased physical dimension HRQoL by 0.37 score (95% CI=−0.64, −0.1). Respondents who were recently admitted had increased total HRQoL score by 5.4 (95% CI = 2.25, 8.55) and increased physical dimensions HRQoL by 2.58 (95% CI=0.97, 4.19) compared to respondents who had no history of admission. Participants who were class-II, class-III, and class-IV (NYHA functional classification) had a higher physical domain, emotion domain, and total HRQoL score than Class-I. Respondents who were receiving treatment in the inpatient department during data collection had increased total HRQoL score by 15.9 (95% CI =10.95, 22.27) and increased score in both dimensions participants in the outpatient department. Participants who used food containing salt had increased total HRQoL scores by 4.5 (95% CI=1.5, 7.4). Respondents who perceive their health is poor and fair had increased scores of total HRQoL by 5.2 (95% CI=1.22, 9.1) and 10.71 (95% CI=1.05, 20.38) compared to participants who perceive their health is as excellent, respectively (Table 5).
Table 5

Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Health Failure in Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372)

HRQoL – TotalHRQoL – physicalHRQoL–Emotional
VariablesDescriptionß95% CIP-valueß95% CIP-valueß95% CIP-value
SexMale(ref)------
Female4.36(0.96,7.7) *0.031.2(−0.70,0.74)2.45(1.33, 3.57) ***0.001
Age0.8(0.01,0.14) *0.0120.04(0.01,0.08) **0.0060.01(−.024, 0 0.02)1052
Family size−0.77(−1.21, −0.19) *0.023−0.37(−0.64, −0.1) **0.009−0.05(−0.21,0.11)0.087
ResidencyUrban(ref)-------
Rural4.63(1.6,7.6) **0.0071.85(0.30,3.39) *0.0230.89(−0.1,1.88)0.07
Wealth indexPoor(ref)------
Medium0.92(−2.28,4.11)0.15−0.04(−1.65, 1.57)0.230.81(−0.22,1.86)0.54
Rich0.82(−4.12,2.49)0.84−.43(−2.10, 1.22)0.330.46(−0.61,1.54)0.62
Duration of illness0.02(−0.75,0.021)0.067−.01(−0.04, 0.01)0.330.01(−0.01,0.02)0.98
Recent admissionNo(ref)------
Yes5.4(2.25, 8.55) ***0.0012.58(0.97,4.19) **0.0040.35(−0.68,1.39)0.55
Department of treatmentOPD (ref)------
Inpatient15.9(10.9, 20.8) ***0.0017.51(0.97,4.19) ***0.0013.6(1.98,5.23) ***0.001
NYHA functional classClass I(ref)-----
Class II15.07(12.1, 19.7) ***0.0017.51(5.6, 9.46) ***0.0012.26(1.01, 3.52) ***0.001
Class III26.62(22.2,31.0) ***0.00112.24(9.9,14.5) ***0.0014.72(3.24, 6.2) ***0.001
Class IV33.49(28.1,38.9) ***0.00114.01(11.3,16.8) ***0.0016.32(4.55, 8.1) ***0.001
Salt intakeNo(ref)--------
Yes4.5(1.5,7.4) **0.0060.89(−0.6,2.4)0.0962.63-(1.64,3.62) ***0.001
SmokingNo(ref)------
Yes4.3(−0.86,9.47)0.0961.58(−1.0,4.1)0.321.18(−0.51, 2.87)0.25
Health perceptionExcellent(ref)------
Good0.7(−3.98,5.41)0.211.18(−1.2, 3.5)0.280.34(−1.9, 1.21)0.09
Fair10.71(1.05,20.38) *0.0127.77(2.7,12.7) **0.0051.17(−4.42,2.06)0.45
Poor5.2(1.22,9.19) *0.0364.08(2.0, 6.1) ***0.0080.72(−2.0,0.6)0.96
Adjusted-R20.680.620.47

Notes: *Variables significant with p-value < 0.05, **variables significant with p-value ≤ 0.01, ***variables significant with p-value ≤ 0.001.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OPD, outpatient department; ref, reference group.

Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Health Failure in Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia, 2018 (n=372) Notes: *Variables significant with p-value < 0.05, **variables significant with p-value ≤ 0.01, ***variables significant with p-value ≤ 0.001. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OPD, outpatient department; ref, reference group.

Discussion

This study aimed to assess the HRQoL and associated factors among HF patients in the Wolaita zone, Sothern Ethiopia. The findings from this study show that HF had an impact on HRQoL patients. Socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, family size, occupation, and residency; Clinical/Medical/factors such as recent admission within the past six months, NYHA functional class, department of treatment; and Behavioral/Lifestyle/factors such as salt intake and health perception had a significant association with aggregate HRQoL. Improving the life year gain is not the only aim of HF management, but also improving the quality and minimizing patients’ disability.38,39 The mean score of the total HRQoL score was 46.37, which pointed out the disease’s influence on the HRQoL. In this study, HRQoL results are lower than studies done from Brazil with a mean HRQoL score of 34.940 and North Carolina with a mean HRQoL score of 32.341 using the same measurement tool showed better HRQoL. This could be due to a better quality of health care services in these countries. This study showed that females were found to experience emotional symptoms and reduced total HRQoL compared to males. This is similar to a comparative study done in Spain42 and the USA43 in which females felt more socially limited and reported lower HRQoL. This could be due to females are expected to take care of their families despite their illness and are economically dependent on their spouse or family member.44 Patients from rural areas had lower overall HRQoL and physical dimension activities than urban dwellers, consistent with a study conducted in California 2014.45 Lower HRQoL in rural patients is possibly attributed to greater distance and limited access to health care services, which results in rescheduling and skipping of appointment visits, which may lead to worsening, readmission, and poor HRQoL.46 Patients in this study, who had a history of recent admission, had reduced physical HRQoL and overall HRQoL compared to patients who did not have recent admission. This is similar to the finding from Spain.42 A possible explanation might be hospitalization, and re-hospitalization reflects disease burden, disease progression, and poor HRQoL.47 This study showed a significant association between the NYHA functional class with all dimensions of HRQoL and the total HRQoL. Higher functional class indicated reduced HRQoL, which agrees with most studies.40,48–50 This is because distress and severity affect patients’ everyday lives with heart failure and lead to a diminished HRQoL.17 In this study, patients from the inpatient department had lower HRQoL in all dimensions. Compared to patients in the outpatient department, the aggregate is similar to finding a Norway study, which shows reduced HRQoL among hospitalized patients.50 This might be due to patients admitted to the inpatient department; the severity and exacerbation of their illness would be high, highly associated with HRQoL. Patients who used to eat salt-containing food had reduced HRQoL compared to those who did not. The possible explanation may be salt/sodium results in fluid retention, which will lead to shortness of breath, fatigue, swelling, and acute exacerbation of heart failure.51

Limitation of the Study

Minnesota Living with Heart Failure is HF-specific instruments that measure the specific problems of disease and sensitive enough to detect small but essential changes in the effect of illness on QoL. However, this instrument is not generic and does not allow for comparisons across diverse conditions or diseases and interventions. This study was not supported by laboratory diagnostic tests like Red blood cell count or Hematocrit to indicate the association between anaemia and HRQoL.

Conclusion

Heart Failure has an impact on the patients’ HRQoL. Around half of the heart failure patients in this study assessed as having poor HRQoL. Being female, living in rural, higher in age and lower family size, history and current admission, salt intake, and higher NYHA classes were associated with worsen HRQoL. Giving psychological support for females besides the medical intervention and more individualized education and treatment adjustments helps them manage their daily lives for patients with severe functional class and elders.
  38 in total

1.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Barriers to the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.

Authors:  John Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-01-14

3.  Correlates of quality of life in rural patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Thomas Nesbitt; Sahar Doctorvaladan; Jeffrey A Southard; Satinder Singh; Anne Fekete; Kate Marie; Debra K Moser; Michelle M Pelter; Susan Robinson; Machelle D Wilson; Lawton Cooper; Kathleen Dracup
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 8.790

4.  Cognitive deficits and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Susan J Pressler; Usha Subramanian; David Kareken; Susan M Perkins; Irmina Gradus-Pizlo; Mary Jane Sauvé; Yan Ding; JinShil Kim; Rebecca Sloan; Heather Jaynes; Rose M Shaw
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 5.  Definitions of quality of life: a taxonomy.

Authors:  M Farquhar
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 6.  The patient perspective: Quality of life in advanced heart failure with frequent hospitalisations.

Authors:  Markku S Nieminen; Kenneth Dickstein; Cândida Fonseca; Jose Magaña Serrano; John Parissis; Francesco Fedele; Gerhard Wikström; Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Shaul Atar; Loant Baholli; Dulce Brito; Josep Comín Colet; István Édes; Juan E Gómez Mesa; Vojka Gorjup; Eduardo Herrera Garza; José R González Juanatey; Nenad Karanovic; Apostolos Karavidas; Igor Katsytadze; Matti Kivikko; Simon Matskeplishvili; Béla Merkely; Fabrizio Morandi; Angel Novoa; Fabrizio Oliva; Petr Ostadal; Antonio Pereira-Barretto; Piero Pollesello; Alain Rudiger; Robert H G Schwinger; Manfred Wieser; Igor Yavelov; Robert Zymliński
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Health-Related Quality of Life, Functional Status, and Cardiac Event-Free Survival in Patients With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jia-Rong Wu; Terry A Lennie; Susan K Frazier; Debra K Moser
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 8.  The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials.

Authors:  Stefan D Anker; Stefan Agewall; Martin Borggrefe; Melanie Calvert; J Jaime Caro; Martin R Cowie; Ian Ford; Jean A Paty; Jillian P Riley; Karl Swedberg; Luigi Tavazzi; Ingela Wiklund; Paulus Kirchhof
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Precipitating factors leading to decompensation of chronic heart failure in the elderly patient in South-American community hospital.

Authors:  Alejandro Diaz; Cleto Ciocchini; Mariano Esperatti; Alberto Becerra; Sabrina Mainardi; Alejandro Farah
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Factors Affecting Health Related Quality of Life in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Georgia Audi; Aggeliki Korologou; Ioannis Koutelekos; Georgios Vasilopoulos; Kostas Karakostas; Kleanthi Makrygianaki; Maria Polikandrioti
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.866

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prevalence of pain and its association with quality of life of patients with heart failure in a developing country: findings from a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Deema Mhesin; Hadeel Nazzal; Jalilah Amerah; Murad Azamtta; Yahia Ismail; Yunis Daralammouri; Mazen A Abdalla; Mohammad M Jaber; Amer A Koni; Sa'ed H Zyoud
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.174

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.