| Literature DB >> 25981363 |
Markku S Nieminen1, Kenneth Dickstein2, Cândida Fonseca3, Jose Magaña Serrano4, John Parissis5, Francesco Fedele6, Gerhard Wikström7, Piergiuseppe Agostoni8, Shaul Atar9, Loant Baholli10, Dulce Brito11, Josep Comín Colet12, István Édes13, Juan E Gómez Mesa14, Vojka Gorjup15, Eduardo Herrera Garza16, José R González Juanatey17, Nenad Karanovic18, Apostolos Karavidas19, Igor Katsytadze20, Matti Kivikko21, Simon Matskeplishvili22, Béla Merkely23, Fabrizio Morandi24, Angel Novoa25, Fabrizio Oliva26, Petr Ostadal27, Antonio Pereira-Barretto28, Piero Pollesello21, Alain Rudiger29, Robert H G Schwinger30, Manfred Wieser31, Igor Yavelov32, Robert Zymliński33.
Abstract
End of life is an unfortunate but inevitable phase of the heart failure patients' journey. It is often preceded by a stage in the progression of heart failure defined as advanced heart failure, and characterised by poor quality of life and frequent hospitalisations. In clinical practice, the efficacy of treatments for advanced heart failure is often assessed by parameters such as clinical status, haemodynamics, neurohormonal status, and echo/MRI indices. From the patients' perspective, however, quality-of-life-related parameters, such as functional capacity, exercise performance, psychological status, and frequency of re-hospitalisations, are more significant. The effects of therapies and interventions on these parameters are, however, underrepresented in clinical trials targeted to assess advanced heart failure treatment efficacy, and data are overall scarce. This is possibly due to a non-universal definition of the quality-of-life-related endpoints, and to the difficult standardisation of the data collection. These uncertainties also lead to difficulties in handling trade-off decisions between quality of life and survival by patients, families and healthcare providers. A panel of 34 experts in the field of cardiology and intensive cardiac care from 21 countries around the world convened for reviewing the existing data on quality-of-life in patients with advanced heart failure, discussing and reaching a consensus on the validity and significance of quality-of-life assessment methods. Gaps in routine care and research, which should be addressed, were identified. Finally, published data on the effects of current i.v. vasoactive therapies such as inotropes, inodilators, and vasodilators on quality-of-life in advanced heart failure patients were analysed.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced heart failure; Levosimendan; Nesiritide; Nitroprusside; Quality of life; Trade-off
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25981363 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol ISSN: 0167-5273 Impact factor: 4.164