Literature DB >> 33510606

Anisotropic Psychophysical Trends in the Discrimination of Tactile Direction in a Precision Grip.

Justin Tanner1, Naomi Newman2, Stephen Helms Tillery1.   

Abstract

Tactile cues arising from interactions with objects have a sense of directionality which affects grasp. Low latency responses to varied grip perturbations indicate that grasp safety margins are exaggerated in certain directions and conditions. In a grip with the ulnar-radial axis vertical, evidence suggests that distal and downward directions are more sensitive to task parameters and have larger safety margins. This suggests that, for the purpose of applying forces with the fingers, reference frames with respect to the hand and gravity are both in operation. In this experiment, we examined human sensitivities to the direction of tactile movement in the context of precision grip in orientations either orthogonal to or parallel to gravity. Subjects performed a two-alternative-forced-choice task involving a textured cube which moved orthogonal to their grip axis. Subjects' arms were placed in a brace that allowed for finger movement but minimized arm movement. Movement of thumb and index joints were monitored via PhaseSpace motion capture. The subject was presented with a textured cube and instructed to lightly grasp the cube, as if it were slipping. In each trial the object was first translated 1 cm in 0° (proximal), 90° (radial), 180° (distal), or 270° (ulnar) and returned to its origin. This primary stimulus was immediately followed by a 10 mm secondary stimulus at a random 5° interval between -30° and 30° of the primary stimulus. Response from the subject after each pair of stimuli indicated whether the test direction felt the same as or different from the primary stimulus. Traditional bias and sensitivity analyses did not provide conclusive results but suggested that performance is best in the ulnar-radial axis regardless of gravity. Modeling of the response curve generated a detection threshold for each primary stimulus. Lower thresholds, indicating improved detection, persisted in the ulnar-radial axis. Anisotropic thresholds of increased detection appear to coincide with digit displacement and appear to be independent of the grasp orientation.
Copyright © 2021 Tanner, Newman and Helms Tillery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anisotropic; bias; precision grip; psychophysics; sensitivity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33510606      PMCID: PMC7835715          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.576020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  15 in total

1.  Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

Authors:  I Birznieks; P Jenmalm; A W Goodwin; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys using a precision grip. II. Responses To object texture and weights.

Authors:  I Salimi; T Brochier; A M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys using a precision grip. III. Responses to altered friction perturbations.

Authors:  I Salimi; T Brochier; A M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-08

5.  In vivo biomechanics of the fingerpad skin under local tangential traction.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Multimodal Interactions between Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Signals in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Pramodsingh H Thakur; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad.

Authors:  H E Wheat; A W Goodwin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Grip-force responses to unanticipated object loading: load direction reveals body- and gravity-referenced intrinsic task variables.

Authors:  C Häger-Ross; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The tactile perception of stimulus orientation.

Authors:  S J Bensmaia; S S Hsiao; P V Denchev; J H Killebrew; J C Craig
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  The proprioceptive map of the arm is systematic and stable, but idiosyncratic.

Authors:  Liliana Rincon-Gonzalez; Christopher A Buneo; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.