Literature DB >> 10036285

Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys using a precision grip. III. Responses to altered friction perturbations.

I Salimi1, T Brochier, A M Smith.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the activity changes in single units of the somatosensory cortex in response to lubricating and adhesive coatings applied to a hand-held object. Three monkeys were trained to grasp an object between the thumb and index fingers and to lift and hold it stationary within a narrow position window for 1 s before release. Grip forces normal to the skin surface, load forces tangential to the skin surface, and the displacement of the object were measured on each trial. Adhesive (rosin) and lubricant (petroleum jelly) coatings were applied to the smooth metal surface of the object to alter the friction against the skin. In addition, neuronal activity evoked by force pulse-perturbations generating shear forces and slip on the skin were compared with the patterns of activity elicited by grasping and lifting the coated surfaces. Following changes in surface coatings, both monkeys modulated the rate at which grip forces normal to the skin surface and load forces tangential to the skin surface were applied during the lifting phase of the task. As a result, the ratio of the rates of change of the two forces was proportionately scaled to the surface coating properties with the more slippery surfaces, having higher ratios. This precise control of normal and tangential forces enabled the monkeys to generate adequate grip forces and prevent slip of the object. From a total of 386 single neurons recorded in the hand area of the somatosensory cortex, 92 were tested with at least 1 coating. Cell discharge changed significantly with changes in surface coating in 62 (67%) of these cells. Of these coating-related cells, 51 were tested with both an adhesive and lubricating coating, and 45 showed significant differences in activity between the untreated metal surface and either the lubricant or the adhesive coating. These cells were divided into three main groups on the basis of their response patterns. In the first group (group A), the peak discharge increased significantly when the grasped surface was covered with lubricant. These cells appeared to be selectively sensitive to slip of the object on the skin. The second group (group B) was less activated by the adhesive surface compared with either the untreated metal or the lubricated surface, and they responded mainly to variations in the force normal to the skin surface. These cells provide useful feedback for the control of grip force. The third group (group C) responded to both slips and to changes in forces tangential to the skin. Most of these cells responded with a biphasic pattern reflecting the bidirectional changes in load force as the object was first accelerated and then decelerated. One hundred sixty-eight of the 386 isolated neurons were tested with brief perturbations during the task. Of these, 147 (88%) responded to the perturbation with a significant change in activity. In most of the cells, the response to the perturbation was shorter than 100 ms with a mean latency of 44.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) ms. For each of the cell groups, the activity patterns triggered by the perturbations were consistent with the activity patterns generated during the grasping and lifting of the coated object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10036285     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

1.  Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex related to tactile exploration.

Authors:  Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Correlation of fingertip shear force direction with somatosensory cortical activity in monkey.

Authors:  Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Jean-Sébastien Langlais; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Prehension stability: experiments with expanding and contracting handle.

Authors:  Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Fan Gao; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A technique to determine friction at the fingertips.

Authors:  Adriana V Savescu; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Failure to disrupt the 'sensorimotor' memory for lifting objects with a precision grip.

Authors:  Kelly J Cole; Martin Potash; Clayton Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  A tactile stimulator for studying passive shape perception.

Authors:  John W Lane; Paul J Fitzgerald; Jeffrey M Yau; Izzet Pembeci; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 8.  Of mice and monkeys: Somatosensory processing in two prominent animal models.

Authors:  Daniel H O'Connor; Leah Krubitzer; Sliman Bensmaia
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Cortical control of object-specific grasp relies on adjustments of both activity and effective connectivity: a common marmoset study.

Authors:  Banty Tia; Mitsuaki Takemi; Akito Kosugi; Elisa Castagnola; Alberto Ansaldo; Takafumi Nakamura; Davide Ricci; Junichi Ushiba; Luciano Fadiga; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Anisotropic Psychophysical Trends in the Discrimination of Tactile Direction in a Precision Grip.

Authors:  Justin Tanner; Naomi Newman; Stephen Helms Tillery
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.