BACKGROUND:Neonatal hypoglycemia is common and can cause brain injury. Buccal dextrose gel is effective for treatment of neonatal hypoglycemia, and when used for prevention may reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia in babies at risk, but its clinical utility remains uncertain. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial in 18 New Zealand and Australian maternity hospitals from January 2015 to May 2019. Babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (maternal diabetes, late preterm, or high or low birthweight) without indications for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were randomized to 0.5 ml/kg buccal 40% dextrose or placebo gel at 1 hour of age. Primary outcome was NICU admission, with power to detect a 4% absolute reduction. Secondary outcomes included hypoglycemia, NICU admission for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, breastfeeding at discharge, formula feeding at 6 weeks, and maternal satisfaction. Families and clinical and study staff were unaware of treatment allocation. A total of 2,149 babies were randomized (48.7% girls). NICU admission occurred for 111/1,070 (10.4%) randomized to dextrose gel and 100/1,063 (9.4%) randomized to placebo (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.10; 95% CI 0.86, 1.42; p = 0.44). Babies randomized to dextrose gel were less likely to become hypoglycemic (blood glucose < 2.6 mmol/l) (399/1,070, 37%, versus 448/1,063, 42%; aRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80, 0.98; p = 0.02) although NICU admission for hypoglycemia was similar between groups (65/1,070, 6.1%, versus 48/1,063, 4.5%; aRR 1.35; 95% CI 0.94, 1.94; p = 0.10). There were no differences between groups in breastfeeding at discharge from hospital (aRR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99, 1.02; p = 0.67), receipt of formula before discharge (aRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.92, 1.08; p = 0.90), and formula feeding at 6 weeks (aRR 1.01; 95% CI 0.93, 1.10; p = 0.81), and there was no hyperglycemia. Most mothers (95%) would recommend the study to friends. No adverse effects, including 2 deaths in each group, were attributable to dextrose gel. Limitations of this study included that most participants (81%) were infants of mothers with diabetes, which may limit generalizability, and a less reliable analyzer was used in 16.5% of glucose measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled randomized trial, prophylactic dextrose gel 200 mg/kg did not reduce NICU admission in babies at risk of hypoglycemia but did reduce hypoglycemia. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the clinical utility of this strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN 12614001263684.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Neonatal hypoglycemia is common and can cause brain injury. Buccal dextrose gel is effective for treatment of neonatal hypoglycemia, and when used for prevention may reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia in babies at risk, but its clinical utility remains uncertain. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial in 18 New Zealand and Australian maternity hospitals from January 2015 to May 2019. Babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (maternal diabetes, late preterm, or high or low birthweight) without indications for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were randomized to 0.5 ml/kg buccal 40% dextrose or placebo gel at 1 hour of age. Primary outcome was NICU admission, with power to detect a 4% absolute reduction. Secondary outcomes included hypoglycemia, NICU admission for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, breastfeeding at discharge, formula feeding at 6 weeks, and maternal satisfaction. Families and clinical and study staff were unaware of treatment allocation. A total of 2,149 babies were randomized (48.7% girls). NICU admission occurred for 111/1,070 (10.4%) randomized to dextrose gel and 100/1,063 (9.4%) randomized to placebo (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.10; 95% CI 0.86, 1.42; p = 0.44). Babies randomized to dextrose gel were less likely to become hypoglycemic (blood glucose < 2.6 mmol/l) (399/1,070, 37%, versus 448/1,063, 42%; aRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80, 0.98; p = 0.02) although NICU admission for hypoglycemia was similar between groups (65/1,070, 6.1%, versus 48/1,063, 4.5%; aRR 1.35; 95% CI 0.94, 1.94; p = 0.10). There were no differences between groups in breastfeeding at discharge from hospital (aRR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99, 1.02; p = 0.67), receipt of formula before discharge (aRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.92, 1.08; p = 0.90), and formula feeding at 6 weeks (aRR 1.01; 95% CI 0.93, 1.10; p = 0.81), and there was no hyperglycemia. Most mothers (95%) would recommend the study to friends. No adverse effects, including 2 deaths in each group, were attributable to dextrose gel. Limitations of this study included that most participants (81%) were infants of mothers with diabetes, which may limit generalizability, and a less reliable analyzer was used in 16.5% of glucose measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled randomized trial, prophylactic dextrose gel 200 mg/kg did not reduce NICU admission in babies at risk of hypoglycemia but did reduce hypoglycemia. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the clinical utility of this strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN 12614001263684.
Authors: Agnes Dechartres; Isabelle Boutron; Ludovic Trinquart; Pierre Charles; Philippe Ravaud Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jeffrey R Kaiser; Shasha Bai; Neal Gibson; Greg Holland; Tsai Mei Lin; Christopher J Swearingen; Jennifer K Mehl; Nahed O ElHassan Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Rebecca Griffith; Joanne Elizabeth Hegarty; Jane M Alsweiler; Greg D Gamble; Robyn May; Christopher Joel Dorman McKinlay; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia Ann Wouldes; Jane E Harding Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Jane M Alsweiler; Leanora Gomes; Tess Nagy; Catherine A Gilchrist; Joanne E Hegarty Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2019-06-22 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: Jane E Harding; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Richard Edlin; Greg Gamble; Jane M Alsweiler Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Joanne Elizabeth Hegarty; Jane Elizabeth Harding; Gregory David Gamble; Caroline Anne Crowther; Richard Edlin; Jane Marie Alsweiler Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jane E Harding; Aakash Bajirao Rajay; Jane Marie Alsweiler; Gavin Brown; Caroline Anne Crowther; Nike Franke; Greg Gamble; Christopher McKinlay; Barry Milne; Jenny Rogers; Trecia Wouldes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Sophie L St Clair; Jane E Harding; Justin M O'Sullivan; Gregory D Gamble; Jane M Alsweiler; Tommi Vatanen Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 6.643
Authors: Taygen Edwards; Jane M Alsweiler; Caroline A Crowther; Richard Edlin; Greg D Gamble; Joanne E Hegarty; Luling Lin; Christopher J D McKinlay; Jenny A Rogers; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding Journal: JAMA Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Taygen Edwards; Gordon Liu; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Jane Alsweiler; Jane E Harding Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: Joanne E Hegarty; Jane M Alsweiler; Gregory G Gamble; Caroline A Crowther; Jane E Harding Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 6.314