Literature DB >> 33507929

Evaluation of oral dextrose gel for prevention of neonatal hypoglycemia (hPOD): A multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Jane E Harding1, Joanne E Hegarty1,2, Caroline A Crowther1, Richard P Edlin1, Gregory D Gamble1, Jane M Alsweiler2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal hypoglycemia is common and can cause brain injury. Buccal dextrose gel is effective for treatment of neonatal hypoglycemia, and when used for prevention may reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia in babies at risk, but its clinical utility remains uncertain. METHODS AND
FINDINGS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial in 18 New Zealand and Australian maternity hospitals from January 2015 to May 2019. Babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (maternal diabetes, late preterm, or high or low birthweight) without indications for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were randomized to 0.5 ml/kg buccal 40% dextrose or placebo gel at 1 hour of age. Primary outcome was NICU admission, with power to detect a 4% absolute reduction. Secondary outcomes included hypoglycemia, NICU admission for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, breastfeeding at discharge, formula feeding at 6 weeks, and maternal satisfaction. Families and clinical and study staff were unaware of treatment allocation. A total of 2,149 babies were randomized (48.7% girls). NICU admission occurred for 111/1,070 (10.4%) randomized to dextrose gel and 100/1,063 (9.4%) randomized to placebo (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.10; 95% CI 0.86, 1.42; p = 0.44). Babies randomized to dextrose gel were less likely to become hypoglycemic (blood glucose < 2.6 mmol/l) (399/1,070, 37%, versus 448/1,063, 42%; aRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80, 0.98; p = 0.02) although NICU admission for hypoglycemia was similar between groups (65/1,070, 6.1%, versus 48/1,063, 4.5%; aRR 1.35; 95% CI 0.94, 1.94; p = 0.10). There were no differences between groups in breastfeeding at discharge from hospital (aRR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99, 1.02; p = 0.67), receipt of formula before discharge (aRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.92, 1.08; p = 0.90), and formula feeding at 6 weeks (aRR 1.01; 95% CI 0.93, 1.10; p = 0.81), and there was no hyperglycemia. Most mothers (95%) would recommend the study to friends. No adverse effects, including 2 deaths in each group, were attributable to dextrose gel. Limitations of this study included that most participants (81%) were infants of mothers with diabetes, which may limit generalizability, and a less reliable analyzer was used in 16.5% of glucose measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled randomized trial, prophylactic dextrose gel 200 mg/kg did not reduce NICU admission in babies at risk of hypoglycemia but did reduce hypoglycemia. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the clinical utility of this strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN 12614001263684.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507929      PMCID: PMC7842885          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Med        ISSN: 1549-1277            Impact factor:   11.069


  14 in total

1.  Neonatal Glycaemia and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Shah; Jane Harding; Julie Brown; Christopher McKinlay
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.

Authors:  Agnes Dechartres; Isabelle Boutron; Ludovic Trinquart; Pierre Charles; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah L Harris; Philip J Weston; Matthew Signal; J Geoffrey Chase; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Association Between Transient Newborn Hypoglycemia and Fourth-Grade Achievement Test Proficiency: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Kaiser; Shasha Bai; Neal Gibson; Greg Holland; Tsai Mei Lin; Christopher J Swearingen; Jennifer K Mehl; Nahed O ElHassan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 16.193

5.  Two-year outcomes after dextrose gel prophylaxis for neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  Rebecca Griffith; Joanne Elizabeth Hegarty; Jane M Alsweiler; Greg D Gamble; Robyn May; Christopher Joel Dorman McKinlay; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia Ann Wouldes; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Adherence to neonatal hypoglycaemia guidelines: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jane M Alsweiler; Leanora Gomes; Tess Nagy; Catherine A Gilchrist; Joanne E Hegarty
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 1.954

7.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Prophylactic Dextrose Gel vs Standard Care for Neonatal Hypoglycemia in At-Risk Infants.

Authors:  Matthew J Glasgow; Richard Edlin; Jane E Harding
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Randomised trial of neonatal hypoglycaemia prevention with oral dextrose gel (hPOD): study protocol.

Authors:  Jane E Harding; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Richard Edlin; Greg Gamble; Jane M Alsweiler
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Prophylactic Oral Dextrose Gel for Newborn Babies at Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Randomised Controlled Dose-Finding Trial (the Pre-hPOD Study).

Authors:  Joanne Elizabeth Hegarty; Jane Elizabeth Harding; Gregory David Gamble; Caroline Anne Crowther; Richard Edlin; Jane Marie Alsweiler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Oral Dextrose Gel Reduces the Need for Intravenous Dextrose Therapy in Neonatal Hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Munmun Rawat; Praveen Chandrasekharan; Stephen Turkovich; Nancy Barclay; Katherine Perry; Eileen Schroeder; Lisa Testa; Satyan Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2016-09-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Different Approaches to requesting Consent for Routine data linkage in Neonatal follow-up (ACORN): protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised trial.

Authors:  Jane E Harding; Aakash Bajirao Rajay; Jane Marie Alsweiler; Gavin Brown; Caroline Anne Crowther; Nike Franke; Greg Gamble; Christopher McKinlay; Barry Milne; Jenny Rogers; Trecia Wouldes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Effect of prophylactic dextrose gel on the neonatal gut microbiome.

Authors:  Sophie L St Clair; Jane E Harding; Justin M O'Sullivan; Gregory D Gamble; Jane M Alsweiler; Tommi Vatanen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.643

3.  Prophylactic Oral Dextrose Gel and Neurosensory Impairment at 2-Year Follow-up of Participants in the hPOD Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Taygen Edwards; Jane M Alsweiler; Caroline A Crowther; Richard Edlin; Greg D Gamble; Joanne E Hegarty; Luling Lin; Christopher J D McKinlay; Jenny A Rogers; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 157.335

4.  Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.

Authors:  Taygen Edwards; Gordon Liu; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Jane Alsweiler; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-17

5.  Effect of Prophylactic Dextrose Gel on Continuous Measures of Neonatal Glycemia: Secondary Analysis of the Pre-hPOD Trial.

Authors:  Joanne E Hegarty; Jane M Alsweiler; Gregory G Gamble; Caroline A Crowther; Jane E Harding
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.314

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.