Literature DB >> 32634402

Cost-Utility Analysis of Prophylactic Dextrose Gel vs Standard Care for Neonatal Hypoglycemia in At-Risk Infants.

Matthew J Glasgow1, Richard Edlin2, Jane E Harding3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term costs and impact on quality of life of using prophylactic dextrose gel in patients at increased risk of developing neonatal hypoglycemia. STUDY
DESIGN: A cost-utility analysis was performed from the perspective of the health system, using a decision tree to model the long-term clinical outcomes of neonatal hypoglycemia, including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, vision disturbances, and learning disabilities, in patients at increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia who received prophylactic dextrose gel vs standard care. Model parameters including likelihoods of hypoglycemia and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, were based on the pre-Hypoglycemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose Study. Estimations of the likelihood of long-term condition(s), and their costs, were based on review of published literature.
RESULTS: Patients who received prophylactic dextrose gel incurred costs to the health system of around US $14 000 over an 18-year time horizon, accruing 11.25 quality-adjusted life-years, whereas those who did not receive prophylactic treatment incurred cost of around $16 000 and experienced a utility of 11.10 quality-adjusted life-years.
CONCLUSIONS: A prophylactic strategy of using dextrose gel in infants at increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia is likely to be cost effective compared with standard care, to reduce the direct costs to the health system over an 18-year time horizon, and improve quality of life.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32634402      PMCID: PMC7779688          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.06.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  52 in total

Review 1.  Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard.

Authors:  R A Hirth; M E Chernew; E Miller; A M Fendrick; W G Weissert
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Hypoglycaemia and the neonatal brain.

Authors:  J M Hawdon
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies.

Authors:  Pallab K Maulik; Maya N Mascarenhas; Colin D Mathers; Tarun Dua; Shekhar Saxena
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2011-01-13

4.  Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of moderate neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  A Lucas; R Morley; T J Cole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-19

5.  Association of Neonatal Glycemia With Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4.5 Years.

Authors:  Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane M Alsweiler; Nicola S Anstice; Nataliia Burakevych; Arijit Chakraborty; J Geoffrey Chase; Gregory D Gamble; Deborah L Harris; Robert J Jacobs; Yannan Jiang; Nabin Paudel; Ryan J San Diego; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 6.  Postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term infants.

Authors:  David H Adamkin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah L Harris; Philip J Weston; Matthew Signal; J Geoffrey Chase; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Visual information processing during controlled hypoglycaemia in humans.

Authors:  R J McCrimmon; I J Deary; B J Huntly; K J MacLeod; B M Frier
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Occipital lobe injury and cortical visual outcomes after neonatal hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Emily W Y Tam; Elysa Widjaja; Susan I Blaser; Daune L Macgregor; Prakash Satodia; Aideen M Moore
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Effects of early breastfeeding on neonatal glucose levels of term infants born to women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  I R A Chertok; I Raz; I Shoham; H Haddad; A Wiznitzer
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.089

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  Jane M Alsweiler; Deborah L Harris; Jane E Harding; Christopher J D McKinlay
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-04-06

2.  Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.

Authors:  Taygen Edwards; Gordon Liu; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Jane Alsweiler; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-17

3.  Evaluation of oral dextrose gel for prevention of neonatal hypoglycemia (hPOD): A multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jane E Harding; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Richard P Edlin; Gregory D Gamble; Jane M Alsweiler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 11.069

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.