Literature DB >> 33798509

Effect of Prophylactic Dextrose Gel on Continuous Measures of Neonatal Glycemia: Secondary Analysis of the Pre-hPOD Trial.

Joanne E Hegarty1, Jane M Alsweiler2, Gregory G Gamble3, Caroline A Crowther3, Jane E Harding4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of different doses of prophylactic dextrose gel on glycemic stability assessed using continuous glucose monitoring in the first 48 hours when given to babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. STUDY
DESIGN: Continuous glucose monitoring was undertaken for the first 48 hours in 133 infants at risk of hypoglycemia who participated in the pre-hPOD randomized dosage trial of dextrose gel prophylaxis.
RESULTS: Low glucose concentrations were detected in 41% of infants by blood glucose monitoring and 68% by continuous interstitial glucose monitoring. The mean ± SD duration of low interstitial glucose concentrations was 295 ± 351 minutes in the first 48 hours. Infants who received any dose of dextrose gel seemed to be less likely than those who received placebo gel to experience low glucose concentrations (<47 mg/dL [2.6 mmol/L]; P = .08), particularly if they received a single dose of 200 mg/kg (relative risk, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.10; P = .049). They also spent a greater proportion of time in the central glucose concentration range of 54-72 mg/dL (3-4 mmol/L) (any dose, mean ± SD, 58.2 ± 20.3%; placebo, 50.0 ± 21.9%; mean difference, 8.20%; 95% CI, 0.43-15.9%; P = .038). Dextrose gel did not increase recurrent or severe episodes of low glucose concentrations and did not increase the peak glucose concentration. These effects were similar for all trial dosages.
CONCLUSIONS: Low glucose concentrations were common in infants at risk of hypoglycemia despite blood glucose monitoring and treatment. Prophylactic dextrose gel reduced the risk of hypoglycemia without adverse effects on glucose stability.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood glucose; hyperglycemia; hypoglycemia; infant newborn; neonatal screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33798509      PMCID: PMC8502486          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   6.314


  20 in total

1.  Association of Neonatal Glycemia With Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4.5 Years.

Authors:  Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane M Alsweiler; Nicola S Anstice; Nataliia Burakevych; Arijit Chakraborty; J Geoffrey Chase; Gregory D Gamble; Deborah L Harris; Robert J Jacobs; Yannan Jiang; Nabin Paudel; Ryan J San Diego; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah L Harris; Philip J Weston; Matthew Signal; J Geoffrey Chase; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Association Between Transient Newborn Hypoglycemia and Fourth-Grade Achievement Test Proficiency: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Kaiser; Shasha Bai; Neal Gibson; Greg Holland; Tsai Mei Lin; Christopher J Swearingen; Jennifer K Mehl; Nahed O ElHassan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Continuous glucose monitoring in infants of very low birth weight.

Authors:  Isabel Iglesias Platas; Marta Thió Lluch; Neus Pociello Almiñana; Ana Morillo Palomo; Martí Iriondo Sanz; Xavier Krauel Vidal
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Validation of the continuous glucose monitoring sensor in preterm infants.

Authors:  K Beardsall; S Vanhaesebrouck; A L Ogilvy-Stuart; C Vanhole; M VanWeissenbruch; P Midgley; M Thio; L Cornette; I Ossuetta; C R Palmer; I Iglesias; M de Jong; B Gill; F de Zegher; D B Dunger
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Continuous glucose monitors prove highly accurate in critically ill children.

Authors:  Brian C Bridges; Catherine M Preissig; Kevin O Maher; Mark R Rigby
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Prophylactic Oral Dextrose Gel for Newborn Babies at Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Randomised Controlled Dose-Finding Trial (the Pre-hPOD Study).

Authors:  Joanne Elizabeth Hegarty; Jane Elizabeth Harding; Gregory David Gamble; Caroline Anne Crowther; Richard Edlin; Jane Marie Alsweiler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Hypoglycemia: When to Treat?

Authors:  Venkat Reddy Kallem; Aakash Pandita; Girish Gupta
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-15

9.  Follow-up study of neurodevelopment in 2-year-old infants who had suffered from neonatal hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Lin-Xia Qiao; Jian Wang; Ju-Hua Yan; Su-Xiang Xu; Hua Wang; Wen-Ying Zhu; Hai-Yan Zhang; Jie Li; Xing Feng
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Evaluation of oral dextrose gel for prevention of neonatal hypoglycemia (hPOD): A multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jane E Harding; Joanne E Hegarty; Caroline A Crowther; Richard P Edlin; Gregory D Gamble; Jane M Alsweiler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prophylactic Oral Dextrose Gel and Neurosensory Impairment at 2-Year Follow-up of Participants in the hPOD Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Taygen Edwards; Jane M Alsweiler; Caroline A Crowther; Richard Edlin; Greg D Gamble; Joanne E Hegarty; Luling Lin; Christopher J D McKinlay; Jenny A Rogers; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Jane E Harding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 157.335

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.