Literature DB >> 33507900

Cost and impact of scaling up female genital mutilation prevention and care programs:  Estimated resource requirements and impact on incidence and prevalence.

Itamar Katz1, Rachel Sanders2, Maria Nadia Carvalho2, Howard S Friedman1, Berhanu Legesse1, William Winfrey2, Nafissatou Diop1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: SDG 5.3 targets include eliminating harmful practices such as Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Limited information is available about levels of investment needed and realistic estimates of potential incidence change. In this work, we estimate the cost and impact of FGM programs in 31 high burden countries.
METHODS: This analysis combines program data, secondary data analysis, and population-level costing methods to estimate cost and impact of high and moderate scaleup of FGM programs between 2020 and 2030. Cost per person or community reached was multiplied by populations to estimate costs, and regression analysis was used to estimate new incidence rates, which were applied to populations to estimate cases averted.
RESULTS: Reaching the high-coverage targets for 31 countries by 2030 would require an investment of US$ 3.3 billion. This scenario would avert more than 24 million cases of FGM, at an average cost of US$ 134 per case averted. A moderate-coverage scenario would cost US$ 1.6 billion and avert more than 12 million cases of FGM. However, average cost per case averted hides substantial variation based on country dynamics. The most cost-effective investment would be in countries with limited historic change in FGM incidence, with the average cost per case averted between US$ 3 and US$ 90. The next most effective would be those with high approval for FGM, but a preexisting trend downward, where cost per case averted is estimated at around US$ 240.
INTERPRETATION: This analysis shows that although data on FGM is limited, we can draw useful findings from population-level surveys and program data to guide resource mobilization and program planning.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507900      PMCID: PMC7842986          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Multivariate causal attribution and cost-effectiveness of a national mass media campaign in the Philippines.

Authors:  D Lawrence Kincaid; Mai Phuong Do
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

2.  Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: testing predictions of social convention theory.

Authors:  Bettina Shell-Duncan; Katherine Wander; Ylva Hernlund; Amadou Moreau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Frequency-dependent female genital cutting behaviour confers evolutionary fitness benefits.

Authors:  Janet A Howard; Mhairi A Gibson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 4.  Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say?

Authors:  Mary Ellsberg; Diana J Arango; Matthew Morton; Floriza Gennari; Sveinung Kiplesund; Manuel Contreras; Charlotte Watts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia, evidence into action.

Authors:  Adriana Kaplan; Suiberto Hechavarría; Miguel Martín; Isabelle Bonhoure
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  What works and what does not: a discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation.

Authors:  R Elise B Johansen; Nafissatou J Diop; Glenn Laverack; Els Leye
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-04-23

Review 7.  A realist synthesis of controlled studies to determine the effectiveness of interventions to prevent genital cutting of girls.

Authors:  Rigmor C Berg; Eva M Denison
Journal:  Paediatr Int Child Health       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Exploration of pathways related to the decline in female circumcision in Egypt.

Authors:  Sepideh Modrek; Jenny X Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Improving Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review of Potential Interventions.

Authors:  Rehana A Salam; Anadil Faqqah; Nida Sajjad; Zohra S Lassi; Jai K Das; Miriam Kaufman; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.012

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries.

Authors:  David Tordrup; Chrissy Bishop; Nathan Green; Max Petzold; Fernando Ruiz Vallejo; Joshua P Vogel; Christina Pallitto
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.