| Literature DB >> 24196703 |
Rigmor C Berg1, Eva M Denison.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a traditional practice which involves the partial or total removal or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. Although current trends indicate that the practice is becoming less prevalent, as many as 30 million girls may still be at risk of FGM/C. Given the associated risks and violation of the human rights of girls and women, the practice is discouraged through preventative interventions. AIMS: To systematically review the effectiveness of anti-FGM/C interventions, applying a realist perspective.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24196703 PMCID: PMC3817579 DOI: 10.1179/2046905513Y.0000000086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Paediatr Int Child Health ISSN: 2046-9047 Impact factor: 1.990
Figure 1Data synthesis approach
Summary of the contextual factors identified, intervention, mechanisms triggered and outcomes of a training programme in Mali
| Context | Intervention characteristics | Mechanisms | Outcomes |
| Mali, districts of Bamako and Bla. | Intervention ( | Training leads to improved knowledge, attitudes and skills. | There was no significant difference between the intervention and comparison groups in any of the outcomes at endline (knowledge, beliefs). |
| Health personnel: Bambara, 96% Muslim. | Comparison ( | Insufficient time span for training. | |
| 94% prevalence of FGM/C (mostly types I&II), highest among ethnic groups in south. No national law/codes can be applied. Increasingly performed by health personnel, but with no formal FGM/C training. Most people support and intend to continue the practice. | Who? Health personnel (obstetricians, gynaecologists, family planning providers). | ||
| Reasons for: tradition, religion, hygiene. | When? Duration 2 months (likely in 1997). | ||
| Reasons against: complications, bad tradition, it prevents sexual satisfaction. | What? Group training sessions consisting of local rationale for FGM/C, its prevalence, the different types of cutting, and the health complications and treatment, plus supervision. Used 6 behaviour-change techniques, largely provision of information and instruction. |
Summary of the contextual factors identified, intervention, mechanisms triggered and outcomes of an education programme in Egypt
| Context | Intervention characteristics | Mechanisms | Outcomes |
| Egypt (lower), urban setting in city of Alexandria. | Intervention ( | Education leads to improved knowledge and attitudes. | Reproductive health sessions for female students achieved a significant increase in mean scores for knowledge of dangers of FGM/C compared with no intervention (MD 0·75 points, 95%CI 0·63–0·87). |
| Female students: 47% from low social class. | Comparison ( | ||
| 99% prevalence of FGM/C in 15–19-year-olds. National law prohibiting FGM/C. Role of men important, but most think FGM/C is not important for marriage. | Who? Female students. | ||
| Reasons for: custom and good tradition, preserve sexual morals/reduce women’s sexual desires, hygiene, religion. | When? Duration 2 hrs, likely in 2001. | ||
| Reasons against: physical complications/harm, sexual problems, no value/benefit, religion. | What? 2×1-hr sessions on reproductive health, consisting of presentations, group discussion, role play, use of educational aids. Used 1 behaviour-change technique (provide information on consequences of behaviour to the individual). |
Summary of the contextual factors identified, intervention, mechanisms triggered and outcomes of a communication programme in Nigeria
| Context | Intervention characteristics | Mechanisms | Outcomes |
| Nigeria, south-east (Enugu state). Community members: most low education, 58% Protestant. | Intervention ( | Convention theory: | Communication programme for community members achieved a significant increase in the proportion of: |
| 25% prevalence of FGM/C (37% in south-east). No national law against FGM/C. About 20% intended to cut daughter. Considered ‘compulsory’ in south-east. Support for FGM/C strongest among older, cut, less educated women. | Comparison ( | - Programme leads to increased awareness, which leads to self-examination of beliefs and values, which triggers ways of thinking and value orientations | - Women who encouraged someone not to perform FGM/C on their daughter (RR 2·68) |
| Reasons for: tradition, control female sexual desire/prevent promiscuity, religion, avoid pregnancy/delivery issues. | Who? Male and female community members. | - Programme leads to dialogue and group/ social interactions and advocacy, which in turn improves self-efficacy and perceived social support. | - Women with no intention of performing FGM/C on their daughter (RR 1·13) |
| Reasons against: physical complications/harm, unnecessary/bad tradition. | When? Duration ∼12 months (2003–2004). | - High degree of programne exposure improved FGM/C-related attitudes, but 36·6% not exposed | - Men who did not believe there were benefits from FGM/C (RR 1·17) |
| What? Multimedia communication (e.g. newspapers, radio call-in shows), development of action plans to improve women’s situation, community meetings. Used 5 behaviour-change techniques, largely provision of information and goal-setting. | - Programme exposure through mass media and community activities affected change more than exposure through either one alone. | - Men who believed most community members favoured discontinuation of FGM/C (RR 1·76). |
Summary of the contextual factors identified, intervention, mechanisms triggered and outcomes of outreach and advocacy in Ethiopia and Kenya
| Context | Intervention characteristics | Mechanisms | Outcomes/conclusions |
| Kenya, refugee camp for Somalis. Community members: adult, Muslim, little education. | Intervention ( | - Education leads to increased awareness | Outreach and advocacy for community members achieved significant increase in the proportion of people in |
| 100% prevalence of FGM/C (mainly type III). Kenyan law against FGM/C in 2001. | Comparison ( | - Training and education trigger advocacy | |
| Reasons for: ensuring marriageability, religion, protection of virginity, tradition. | Who? Male and female community members in camps. | - IEC activities (Information/education/communication) affect intentions | |
| When? Duration 18 months (2001–2002). | - IEC activities lead to individuals’ improved knowledge and attitudes, which leads to groups’ increased mutual understanding and agreement, which translates into collective action, which in turn shapes social norms. | ||
| What? Community-level information and education outreach plus advocacy educational events, community meetings, theatre group performances, video sessions, mass media activities and support of advocacy. Used 4 behaviour-change techniques, largely provision of information, instruction and prompts for identification as role model. | - Programme changes were possible and staff were trusted | ||
| - FGM/C addressed as part of a larger set of reproductive health issues. | |||
| - Community objected to intervention | |||
| - Planned work with religious leaders did not occur; leaders gave mixed messages | |||
| - Insufficient programme exposure; some messages not recalled | |||
| - Somalis objected to law against FGM/C | |||
| - Likely distrust by Muslim program recipients towards Christian program implementers. | |||
| Ethiopia, near Awash town (north-east). Community members: Afar, Muslim, little education. | Intervention ( | - Education leads to increased awareness | Outreach and advocacy for community members achieved a significant increase in the proportion of community members who |
| 91% prevalence of FGM/C (mainly type III). National law against FGM/C in 2004. | Comparison ( | - Training and education trigger advocacy | - had no intention to perform FGM/C (RR 2·62) |
| Strong link between FGM/C and Islam. | Who? Male and female community members. | - IEC activities affect intentions | - believed that FGM/C compromised the human rights of women (RR 2·21) |
| When? Duration 15 months (2001–2002). | - IEC activities lead to individuals’ improved knowledge and attitudes, which leads to groups’ increased mutual understanding and agreement, which translates into collective action, which in turn shapes social norms. | - knew of harmful consequences of FGM/C (RR 1·37). | |
| What? Community-level information and education outreach plus advocacy educational events, community meetings, theatre group performances, video sessions, mass media activities, and support of advocacy. Used 4 behaviour-change techniques, largely provision of information, instruction and prompts for identification as role model. | - Programme changes were possible and staff were trusted – FGM/C was addressed as part of a larger set of reproductive health issues | ||
| - Intervention succeeded in mobilizing religious leaders | |||
| - Community objected to intervention | |||
| - Insufficient exposure to intervention. |
Summary of the contextual factors identified, intervention, mechanisms triggered, and outcomes of Tostan education programme in Mali, Senegal and Burkina Faso
| Context | Intervention characteristics | Mechanisms | Outcomes |
| Mali, Kati area (south). Community members: Bambara, Muslim, no or little education. | Intervention ( | - Education leads to increased knowledge, which fosters confidence + empowerment, which affect a sense of activism | Tostan education programme for community members achieved an increase in the proportion of intervention participants opposed to FGM/C, but there was a baseline difference between the groups regarding this outcome (8% in intervention group |
| 94% prevalence of FGM/C (mostly types I&II). Especially ethnic groups in south. No national law/codes can be applied. Most support and intend to continue. | Comparison ( | - Education affects intentions, attitudes, and skills | |
| Reasons for: tradition, religion, hygiene. | Who? Male and female community members. | - Education leads to public discussions | |
| Reasons against: complications, bad tradition, prevents sexual satisfaction. | When? Duration 6 months (2000). | - Education increases empowerment, which affects attitudes and behavior. | |
| What?: Tostan four-module education programme (hygiene, problem-solving, human rights, women’s health). Used 4 behaviour-change techniques: provision of information, goal-setting, and prompts for practice and identification as role model. | - Programme ‘grounded’ in local context | ||
| - Programme included both genders | |||
| - Separate women’s circles were important for reinforcement | |||
| - Human rights framework was meaningful to participants | |||
| - Participants received FGM/C information from sources other than the intervention. | |||
| - Drop-out from sessions, especially men | |||
| - Insufficient pre-service facilitator training | |||
| - Disagreements, lack of mutual expectations among organisers | |||
| - Implementation problems | |||
| - Lack of clarity how to fit into local context. | |||
| Senegal, Kolda region (south). Community members: Pulaar and Mandingo, Muslim, no or low education. | Intervention ( | - Education leads to increased knowledge | Tostan education programme for community members achieved a significant |
| 28% prevalence of FGM/C (94% in Kolda) (mostly type I&III). National law against FGM/C in 1999. About half approved of FGM/C | Comparison ( | - Education leads to improved attitudes and skills | - decrease in the proportion of 0–10-year-old girls who were cut (RR 0·77) |
| Reasons for: respect tradition, obey religious demand, for cleanliness, initiation of girls, for women to get married, men prefer cut women. | Who? Male and female community members. | - Education leads to public discussions/social interactions, which leads to public commitment | - increase in the proportion of women who knew at least two consequences of FGM/C (RR 2·92) |
| When? Duration 6 months (2001). | - Education empowers people. | - increase in the proportion of men who knew at least two consequences of FGM/C (RR 3·10). | |
| What? Tostan four-module education program. Used 2 behaviour-change techniques: provide information on consequences of behaviour to the individual, and prompt identification as role model/position advocate. | - Participants satisfied with the programme | ||
| - Only those most motivated participated in everything | |||
| - Participants received FGM/C information from other sources, before and during the intervention | |||
| - Intervention villages selected met certain criteria, many willing to abandon FGM/C. | |||
| - Religious leader openly favored FGM/C | |||
| - Many who signed up did not attend | |||
| - Low and inconsistent participation; high drop-out | |||
| - Some objected to the intervention | |||
| - Implementation problems. | |||
| Burkina Faso (Zoundwéogo, south-central). Community members: Mossi, 45% Muslim, no or little education. | Intervention ( | - Education leads to increased knowledge | Tostan education programme for community members achieved a significant increase in the proportion of |
| 72% prevalence of FGM/C (mostly types I&II). National law against FGM/C in 1996. | Comparison ( | - Education leads to improved motivation and skills | - women who regretted having had daughter cut (RR 1·26) |
| FGM/C most common in rural areas, among Muslim women. Support for FGM/C strongest among cut, rural, non-educated women. | Who? Male and female community members. | - Education leads to increased knowledge, engagement and triggers confidence | - women who disapproved of FGM/C (RR 1·04) |
| Reasons for: tradition and custom, religion, reduce sexual desire, avoid an alleged disease of genital organs. | When? Duration 8 months (2001–2002). | - Education empowers participants. | -women who knew at least two consequences of FGM/C (RR 2·92) |
| Reasons against: medical complications, prohibited by law, painful experience, prevents sexual pleasure. | What? Tostan four-module education program. Used 2 behaviour-change techniques (same as in Senegal). | - Delayed implementation of part of programme | - men who had no intention to perform FGM/C on daughter (RR 1·05) |
| - Difficult retaining facilitators, which disrupted programme progress | - men who disapproved of FGM/C (RR 1·10) | ||
| - Inconsistent participation and drop-out | - men who believed FGM/C was unnecessary (RR 1·06) | ||
| - Participants didn’t distribute information | - men who knew at least two consequences of FGM/C (RR 1·47). | ||
| - Lack of tangible incentives to motivate participants. |