Literature DB >> 18398094

Intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-responding breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio study.

Gunter von Minckwitz1, Sherko Kümmel, Petra Vogel, Claus Hanusch, Holger Eidtmann, Jörn Hilfrich, Bernd Gerber, Jens Huober, Serban Dan Costa, Christian Jackisch, Sibylle Loibl, Keyur Mehta, Manfred Kaufmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with an early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have chemosensitive tumors and a high probability for a pathological complete response at surgery. The relationship between extended chemotherapy and pathological complete response at surgery was investigated in a clinical trial.
METHODS: Untreated breast cancer patients received two 3-week cycles of docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2), doxorubicin at 50 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide at 500 mg/m(2) (TAC). Those whose tumor size decreased by 50% or more by sonographic measurement (ie, reduction in the product of the two largest perpendicular diameters by at least 50%) were classified as responders and randomly assigned to receive four or six more cycles of TAC, for a total of six or eight TAC cycles. The primary aim was to increase the rate of a pathological complete response (defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor masses in the breast and lymph nodes) from 20% to 26%. Sonographic response rates and rates of breast-conserving surgery and adverse effects were also assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Of the 2090 patients in the GeparTrio trial, 1390 (66.5%) were randomly assigned as responders after two initial TAC cycles to receive an additional four (n = 704) or six (n = 686) TAC cycles. Rates of pathological complete response were not statistically significantly different between the arms (21.0% with six TAC cycles and 23.5% with eight TAC cycles; difference = 2.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.8% to 6.8%; P = .27). More clinical (48.2% vs 52.9%, difference = 4.7%; 95% CI = -0.55% to 9.95%; P = .08) and sonographic (22.6% vs 27.6%, difference = 5%; 95% CI = 0.45% to 9.55%; P = .033) complete responses at surgery were observed with eight TAC cycles than with six TAC cycles. The rate of breast-conserving surgery was similar in both arms (67.5% vs 68.5%, respectively, P = .68). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and edema and various grade 1 or 2 adverse events were more frequent in patients receiving eight TAC cycles than in those receiving six cycles.
CONCLUSION: Patients receiving eight TAC cycles had statistically significantly higher sonographic response rates but not pathological complete response rates than those receiving six TAC cycles. However, they also had more toxic effects. So far, eight cycles of TAC cannot be recommended for the whole group of patients responding to two initial cycles of TAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18398094     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  68 in total

1.  Re-Challenging Taxanes in Recurrent Breast Cancer in Patients Treated with (Neo-)Adjuvant Taxane-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Xinrong Guo; Sibylle Loibl; Michael Untch; Volker Möbus; Kathrin Schwedler; Peter A Fasching; Jana Barinoff; Frank Holms; Christoph Thomssen; Dirk M Zahm; Rolf Kreienberg; Maik Hauschild; Holger Eidtmann; Sascha Tauchert; Keyur Mehta; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  How do I treat "triple-negative" disease.

Authors:  Christos Vaklavas; Andres Forero-Torres
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

3.  Pathways and biomarkers in breast cancer: latest evidence.

Authors:  Gordon Mallarkey; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  Early monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT: defining a clinical aim.

Authors:  David Groheux; Sylvie Giacchetti; Marc Espié; Domenico Rubello; Jean-luc Moretti; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Landscape of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tufia C Haddad; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Management of locally advanced breast cancer-perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Elzbieta Senkus; Maria J Cardoso; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: assessing treatment progress and managing poor responders.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Georg Thomas Budd
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Adding Adjuvant Systemic Treatment after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Data.

Authors:  Shetal A Patel; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Time interval of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery in breast cancer: how long is acceptable?

Authors:  Tae-Kyung Yoo; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.