| Literature DB >> 33506138 |
Julien Ognard1,2, Nicolas Demany1, Jawad Mesrar1, Ludwig Serge Aho-Glélé3, Alain Saraux4, Douraied Ben Salem1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The bone medullar adiposity is a marker of bone quality to the point that there is a need to investigate the factors which influence or not the density and distribution of this fat in the spine, especially at the lumbar level. The purpose was to test the feasibility of a Dixon three-point technique and investigate the vertebral marrow fat distribution.Entities:
Keywords: Adiposity; Lumbar vertebrae; MRI; Spine
Year: 2021 PMID: 33506138 PMCID: PMC7814159 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Population description.
| Age (years) | Weight (kilograms) | Height (meters) | BMI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 40.43 | 73.8 | 1.72 | 24.88 |
| SD | 15.27 | 19.42 | 0.097 | 5.57 |
| Min | 18 | 49 | 1.5 | 18.22 |
| Max | 77 | 150 | 1.9 | 48.98 |
BMI: Body Mass Index (kg.m−2).
Standard Deviation.
Figure 1MRI Sagittal median slices of the lumbar spine: On the right, color-enhanced image representing the cartography of medullary adiposity, automatically generated from the IDEAL-IQ sequence: the brighter the color is, the higher the fat concentration is. On the left, a T1weighted slice at the same level on the same patient.
Figure 2IDEAL sequence medullary adiposity cartography showing fat average at each vertebral level from T12 to SI, determined by regions of interest freehand drawn, display here on 5 consecutives slices.
Average fat fraction per vertebral body.
| Vertebra | Average fat fraction in % (95% CI) | Gradient | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| T12 | 31.71 (14.70–57.08) | Reference | |
| L1 | 33.24 (15.86–59.45) | 1.53 | 0.522 |
| L2 | 35.36 (17.99–59.16) | 2.12 | 0.141 |
| L3 | 37.47 (19.13–63.84) | 2.11 | 0.025 |
| L4 | 38.75 (19.35–66.76) | 1.28 | 0.007 |
| L5 | 39.91 (19.47–72.82) | 1.16 | 0.002 |
| S1 | 38.93 (16.98–68.67) | -0.98 | 0.006 |
The gradient is calculated making the difference between the average fat fraction of the considered vertebra and the average fat fraction of the superior vertebra. Comparison is done with T12 as a reference for this gradient. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3Graphic showing average fat fraction and 95% confidence interval by vertebral body depending on the vertebral level.
Figure 4Graphic showing average vertebral fat fraction and 95% confidence interval depending on level and age subgroups (under and over 40 years-old).