Jarad Martin1, Geoffrey Nicholson, Gary Cowin, Clare Ilente, Winnie Wong, Dominic Kennedy. 1. Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Vertebral body fat fraction (FF) has been found to vary between lumbar vertebrae using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). We aim to more quickly assess a larger number of adjacent vertebrae using a single T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) sequence. METHODS: Five men had dual-energy X-ray absorptometry (DEXA) and 1.5-T MR scans performed. MRS was performed at L3, and a sagittal IDEAL sequence was also performed, resulting in separate fat-only and water-only readings from T10 to S2. For the IDEAL measurements, two independent observers followed a set reading protocol, with five observations each per vertebra. Intra- and interobserver variability were assessed as deviations from the mean within and between observers, respectively. RESULTS: For FF measurements there was limited intra-observer variation, with observers being on average within 3.4% of the pooled mean value. Similarly, there was good interobserver agreement, with an average variation of 2.1%. All men showed a reduction in FF of 1.6-7% between L5 and S1. Otherwise, there was a trend of increasing FF moving inferiorly from T10 to S2. This averaged 2.7% per vertebra (range 1.1-3.8%) and may not have been dependent on MRS-measured FF at the L3 level. There was poor correlation between MRS-measured FF at L2-4 and bone mineral density measured using DEXA (R(2) = 0.06). CONCLUSION: IDEAL measurements are generally reproducible between observers following a set protocol. There appears to be a gradient in FF moving from T10 to S2, with S1 showing a consistent decrease. This variation may better describe overall marrow function than a single-vertebra reading.
INTRODUCTION: Vertebral body fat fraction (FF) has been found to vary between lumbar vertebrae using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). We aim to more quickly assess a larger number of adjacent vertebrae using a single T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) sequence. METHODS: Five men had dual-energy X-ray absorptometry (DEXA) and 1.5-T MR scans performed. MRS was performed at L3, and a sagittal IDEAL sequence was also performed, resulting in separate fat-only and water-only readings from T10 to S2. For the IDEAL measurements, two independent observers followed a set reading protocol, with five observations each per vertebra. Intra- and interobserver variability were assessed as deviations from the mean within and between observers, respectively. RESULTS: For FF measurements there was limited intra-observer variation, with observers being on average within 3.4% of the pooled mean value. Similarly, there was good interobserver agreement, with an average variation of 2.1%. All men showed a reduction in FF of 1.6-7% between L5 and S1. Otherwise, there was a trend of increasing FF moving inferiorly from T10 to S2. This averaged 2.7% per vertebra (range 1.1-3.8%) and may not have been dependent on MRS-measured FF at the L3 level. There was poor correlation between MRS-measured FF at L2-4 and bone mineral density measured using DEXA (R(2) = 0.06). CONCLUSION: IDEAL measurements are generally reproducible between observers following a set protocol. There appears to be a gradient in FF moving from T10 to S2, with S1 showing a consistent decrease. This variation may better describe overall marrow function than a single-vertebra reading.
Authors: Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Michael Meier-Schroers; Daniel Lloyd Kuetting; Andreas Feißt; Jürgen Gieseke; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stefan Ruschke; Amber Pokorney; Thomas Baum; Holger Eggers; Jeffrey H Miller; Houchun H Hu; Dimitrios C Karampinos Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Christian Cordes; Thomas Baum; Michael Dieckmeyer; Stefan Ruschke; Maximilian N Diefenbach; Hans Hauner; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Dimitrios C Karampinos; Stefan Ruschke; Michael Dieckmeyer; Maximilian Diefenbach; Daniela Franz; Alexandra S Gersing; Roland Krug; Thomas Baum Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Raymond Wu; Hannah Woodford; Anne Capp; Perry Hunter; Gary Cowin; Keen-Hun Tai; Paul L Nguyen; Peter Chong; Jarad Martin Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.481