Literature DB >> 33505463

Are Technology-Driven Mobile Phone Applications (Apps) the New Currency for Digital Stent Registries and Patient Communication: Prospective Outcomes Using Urostentz App.

B M Zeeshan Hameed1,2, Milap J Shah1, Nithesh Naik3, Mohan Amaresh1, Padmaraj Hegde1, Rahil Hussein Beary4, Suraj Jayadeva1, Bhaskar K Somani5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forgotten ureteral stents (FUS) and stent-related symptoms (SRS) lead to increased postprocedural emergency department visits and add to the psychological and financial burden of the patients.
PURPOSE: To review the usage and benefits of ureteral stent tracking and symptom monitoring through a single smartphone-based application (App) platform with 2-way clinician-patient communication. This study also compared the features with other smartphone apps used for stent tracking.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 patients were included in this single-center prospective study conducted between September 2019 and December 2019. Patients who had metallic or long-term indwelling stents, noncomprehensible patients, and those not willing to share their data were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 92 downloaded the Urostentz application, and 72 (78.2%) patients answered the pictorial symptom questionnaire. Symptom score analysis suggested that 62 patients (86.1%) had stent-related symptoms of which 3 required readmission and underwent early stent removal. The mean stent duration was 17.2 + 3.5 days (range: 11-23 days), with 69% of patients having their stent removed on the scheduled date and 25% of patients requesting a change of their appointment via the App.
CONCLUSION: In this study, there was no case of FUS encountered. The "Urostentz" App is a freely available patient safety stent tracking application that provides a secure and simplified interface, which can significantly reduce the incidence of FUS and provide digital remote assistance in the management of stent-related symptoms.
Copyright © 2021 B. M. Zeeshan Hameed et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33505463      PMCID: PMC7810523          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6612371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Urol        ISSN: 1687-6369


  18 in total

Review 1.  Comparative evaluation of materials used for internal ureteral stents.

Authors:  H K Mardis; R M Kroeger; J J Morton; J M Donovan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Indwelling ureteral stents: impact of material and shape on patient comfort.

Authors:  R Thomas
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Have stent-related symptoms anything to do with placement technique?

Authors:  A Rane; A Saleemi; D Cahill; S Sriprasad; N Shrotri; R Tiptaft
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma.

Authors:  M Monga; E Klein; W R Castañeda-Zúñiga; R Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Efficacy of intravesical ropivacaine injection on urinary symptoms following ureteral stenting: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Roger L Sur; George E Haleblian; David A Cantor; W Patrick Springhart; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Haleblian; Kittinut Kijvikai; Jean de la Rosette; Glenn Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times.

Authors:  S R el-Faqih; A B Shamsuddin; A Chakrabarti; R Atassi; A H Kardar; M K Osman; I Husain
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Clinical evaluation of double-pigtail stent in patients with upper urinary tract diseases: report of 2685 cases.

Authors:  Ping Hao; Weibing Li; Caiping Song; Junan Yan; Bo Song; Longkun Li
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Pilot Study to Determine Optimal Stent Duration Following Ureteroscopy: Three versus Seven days.

Authors:  Charles J Paul; Nathan A Brooks; George M Ghareeb; Chad R Tracy
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-12-30

10.  Smartphone-based stent tracking application for prevention of forgotten ureteral double-J stents: a prospective study.

Authors:  Volkan Ulker; Hasan Anil Atalay; Ozgur Cakmak; Cem Yucel; Orcun Celik; Zafer Kozacioglu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Ureteric Stones - State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Radhika Bhanot; Patrick Jones; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-05-06

2.  Free interactive counselling program in a mobile communication application for improving health education on indwelling ureteric stents after ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: An observational study.

Authors:  Tzu-Yu Chuang; Weiming Cheng; Yi-Chun Chiu; Yu-Hua Fan; Chia-Chi Chi; Chang-Chi Chang; Chia-Heng Liao
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-08-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.