Literature DB >> 8518822

Comparative evaluation of materials used for internal ureteral stents.

H K Mardis1, R M Kroeger, J J Morton, J M Donovan.   

Abstract

The materials used in the fabrication of self-retained internal ureteral stents should provide strength, flexibility, low surface friction, radiopacity, biodurability, biocompatibility, and reasonable unit cost. Polymeric biomaterials currently used for stent construction include polyurethane, silicone, Silitek, C-Flex, and Percuflex. Comparative evaluation of these materials in the context of the requirements for stent structure and function suggests advantages and disadvantages for all of them. We believe that the most important attributes for an internal ureteral stent are ease of insertion, effective restoration and maintenance of flow, resistance to migration, significant biodurability, and biocompatibility. Based on our physical testing of stents fabricated from these materials, as well as clinical and laboratory experience, we believe that C-Flex and Percuflex are the most suitable materials for stent construction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8518822     DOI: 10.1089/end.1993.7.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  12 in total

1.  Sequential polyurethane-poly(methylmethacrylate) interpenetrating polymer networks as ureteral biomaterials: mechanical properties and comparative resistance to urinary encrustation.

Authors:  D S Jones; M C Bonner; S P Gorman; M Akay; P F Keane
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Ureteral decompression in advanced nonurologic malignancies.

Authors:  S M Donat; P Russo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Minimal Device Encrustation on Vesair Intravesical Balloons in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Analysis of Balloons Removed from Women in the SOLECT Trial.

Authors:  Gommert A van Koeveringe; Stefan De Wachter; Jack M Zuckerman; Giovanni Tommaselli; Michel J de Wildt; Karel C M Everaert; Dirk P J Michielsen; Jean-Jacques Wyndaele
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Intelligent Optimization of the Film-to-Fiber Ratio of a Degradable Braided Bicomponent Ureteral Stent.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Liu; Feng Li; Yongsheng Ding; Ting Zou; Lu Wang; Kuangrong Hao
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Silicone-hydrocoated ureteral stents encrustation and biofilm formation after 3-week dwell time: results of a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Yazeed Barghouthy; Oliver Wiseman; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Julien Letendre; Jonathan Cloutier; Michel Daudon; Francois Kleinclauss; Steeve Doizi; Mariela Corrales; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Assessment of bio-safety of low-cost polyurethane urologic stents used in developing countries.

Authors:  Nobhojit Roy; Santosh Waingankar; Gaurav Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04

7.  Forgotten/retained double J ureteric stents: A source of severe morbidity in children.

Authors:  Rajendra B Nerli; Prasad V Magdum; Vikas Sharma; Ajay Kumar Guntaka; Murigendra B Hiremath; Shridhar Ghagane
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials.

Authors:  Ali Mosayyebi; Costantino Manes; Dario Carugo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Ureteral stents in urolithiasis.

Authors:  Matthias Beysens; Thomas O Tailly
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-07-25

10.  Engineering solutions to ureteral stents: material, coating and design.

Authors:  Ali Mosayyebi; Aravinthan Vijayakumar; Qi Y Yue; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Costantino Manes; Dario Carugo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.