Literature DB >> 1942324

Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times.

S R el-Faqih1, A B Shamsuddin, A Chakrabarti, R Atassi, A H Kardar, M K Osman, I Husain.   

Abstract

The morbidity and complications associated with use of internal polyurethane ureteral stents in a series of 290 stone patients treated endourologically or with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 299 stents retrieved 141 were also tested for patency to relate the rate of luminal blockage with stent caliber, indwelling time and clinical evidence of obstruction in the stented tract. Stent indwelling times ranged from a few days to 18 months: 11.3% were indwelling longer than 6 months and 1.9% were lost to followup. Incrustation occurred in 9.2% of the stents retrieved before 6 weeks, 47.5% indwelling 6 to 12 weeks and 76.3% thereafter. In 19 cases over-all (6.4%) an auxiliary procedure was required to decrease incrusted stone burden and enable stent retrieval. Other complications included stent migration (3.7%), infection (6.7%) and breakage (0.3%). Despite a 30% rate of luminal blockage in stents retrieved after indwelling times up to 3 months, the incidence of clinical obstruction in stented tracts up to 3 months was 4%, confirming other reports that significant urine flow occurs around rather than through hollow, vented stents. Our findings underline the importance of restricting the use of stents to stone patients who will be reliable at followup. Morbidity was minimal if stent indwelling times did not exceed 6 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1942324     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38146-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  63 in total

1.  Single session removal of forgotten encrusted ureteral stents: combined endourological approach.

Authors:  Yakup Bostanci; Ender Ozden; Fatih Atac; Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu; Ali Faik Yilmaz; Saban Sarikaya
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-12-11

2.  Ureteroscopic removal of forgotten ureteral stent.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroaki Ishida; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-06-14

3.  Prone split-leg position to manage encrusted ureteral stents in a single-stage procedure in women: Step-by-step surgical technique.

Authors:  Giovanni Scala Marchini; Fábio César Miranda Torricelli; Eduardo Mazzucchi; Miguel Srougi; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  [Plasma-deposited carbon coating on urological indwelling catheters: Preventing formation of encrustations and consecutive complications].

Authors:  N Laube; J Bradenahl; A Meissner; J V Rappard; L Kleinen; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indications-complications.

Authors:  Klaus Armin Hausegger; Horst Rupert Portugaller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Can the complicated forgotten indwelling ureteric stents be lethal?

Authors:  V Singh; A Srinivastava; R Kapoor; A Kumar
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Spontaneous fracture of indwelling ureteral stents in patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: two case reports.

Authors:  Y Ilker; L Türkeri; O Dillioğlugil; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Spontaneous fragmentation of a double J stent.

Authors:  O Adsan; E Güner; B Oztürk; T Ataman; M Cetinkaya
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Spontaneous fracture of indwelling polyurethane ureteral stents: A case series and review of literature.

Authors:  Michael E Chua; Marcelino L Morales
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Is routine ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm?

Authors:  Kenan Isen; Isen Kenan; Salih Bogatekin; Bogatekin Salih; Suat Em; Em Suat; Huseyin Ergin; Ergin Huseyin; Vehbi Kilic; Kilic Vehbi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.