Literature DB >> 33503342

Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception.

David K Turok1, Alexandra Gero1, Rebecca G Simmons1, Jennifer E Kaiser1, Gregory J Stoddard1, Corinne D Sexsmith1, Lori M Gawron1, Jessica N Sanders1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, more intrauterine device (IUD) users select levonorgestrel IUDs than copper IUDs for long-term contraception. Currently, clinicians offer only copper IUDs for emergency contraception because data are lacking on the efficacy of the levonorgestrel IUD for this purpose.
METHODS: This randomized noninferiority trial, in which participants were unaware of the group assignments, was conducted at six clinics in Utah and included women who sought emergency contraception after at least one episode of unprotected intercourse within 5 days before presentation and agreed to placement of an IUD. We randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive a levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD or a copper T380A IUD. The primary outcome was a positive urine pregnancy test 1 month after IUD insertion. When a 1-month urine pregnancy test was unavailable, we used survey and health record data to determine pregnancy status. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 2.5 percentage points.
RESULTS: Among the 355 participants randomly assigned to receive levonorgestrel IUDs and 356 assigned to receive copper IUDs, 317 and 321, respectively, received the interventions and provided 1-month outcome data. Of these, 290 in the levonorgestrel group and 300 in the copper IUD group had a 1-month urine pregnancy test. In the modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, pregnancy rates were 1 in 317 (0.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 1.7) in the levonorgestrel group and 0 in 321 (0%; 95% CI, 0 to 1.1) in the copper IUD group; the between-group absolute difference in both analyses was 0.3 percentage points (95% CI, -0.9 to 1.8), consistent with the noninferiority of the levonorgestrel IUD to the copper IUD. Adverse events resulting in participants seeking medical care in the first month after IUD placement occurred in 5.2% of participants in the levonorgestrel IUD group and 4.9% of those in the copper IUD group.
CONCLUSIONS: The levonorgestrel IUD was noninferior to the copper IUD for emergency contraception. (Supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02175030.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33503342      PMCID: PMC7983017          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  21 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Helena von Hertzen; Gilda Piaggio; Juhong Ding; Junling Chen; Si Song; György Bártfai; Ernest Ng; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Amindavaa Oyunbileg; Shangchun Wu; Weiyu Cheng; Frank Lüdicke; Alenka Pretnar-Darovec; Rosemary Kirkman; Suneeta Mittal; Archil Khomassuridze; Dan Apter; Alexandre Peregoudov
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Copper intrauterine device placement 6-14 days after unprotected sex.

Authors:  Ivana Thompson; Jessica N Sanders; E Bimla Schwarz; Christy Boraas; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Contraceptive Method Use During the Community-Wide HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Kyl Myers; Lori M Gawron; Rebecca G Simmons; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel.

Authors:  Anna Glasier; Sharon T Cameron; Diana Blithe; Bruno Scherrer; Henri Mathe; Delphine Levy; Erin Gainer; Andre Ulmann
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Association of short-term bleeding and cramping patterns with long-acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction.

Authors:  Justin T Diedrich; Sanyukta Desai; Qiuhong Zhao; Gina Secura; Tessa Madden; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.

Authors:  Ian R White; Patrick Royston; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016.

Authors:  Kathryn M Curtis; Tara C Jatlaoui; Naomi K Tepper; Lauren B Zapata; Leah G Horton; Denise J Jamieson; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2016-07-29

9.  Experience with same-day placement of the 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Paula M Castaño; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Haoping Zhu; Norman Goldstuck; Linan Cheng; James Trussell
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  7 in total

1.  Development and Pilot Testing of a Dispensing Protocol on Emergency Contraceptive Pills for Community Pharmacists in Belgium.

Authors:  Michael Ceulemans; Marieke Brughmans; Laura-Lien Poortmans; Ellen Spreuwers; Julie Willekens; Nele Roose; Isabelle De Wulf; Veerle Foulon
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendations: Contraceptive Care in the Context of Pandemic Response.

Authors:  Bianca M Stifani; Tessa Madden; Elizabeth Micks; Ghazaleh Moayedi; Jessica Tarleton; Lyndsey S Benson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Breastfeeding and contraception counseling: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marit Pearlman Shapiro; Karina Avila; Erika E Levi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  New Era of Electroceuticals: Clinically Driven Smart Implantable Electronic Devices Moving towards Precision Therapy.

Authors:  RaviPrakash Magisetty; Sung-Min Park
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 5.  Special Considerations for Women of Reproductive Age on Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Tali Azenkot; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  Pregnancy Risk by Frequency and Timing of Unprotected Intercourse Before Intrauterine Device Placement for Emergency Contraception.

Authors:  Abena BakenRa; Alexandra Gero; Jessica Sanders; Rebecca Simmons; Kathryn Fay; David K Turok
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.623

7.  Rates of pregnancy among levonorgestrel and copper intrauterine emergency contraception initiators: Implications for backup contraception recommendations.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Amelia C Clement; Alexandra Gero; Jennifer E Kaiser; Jessica N Sanders; Abena A BakenRa; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.051

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.