Literature DB >> 25046805

Association of short-term bleeding and cramping patterns with long-acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction.

Justin T Diedrich1, Sanyukta Desai2, Qiuhong Zhao2, Gina Secura2, Tessa Madden2, Jeffrey F Peipert2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the short-term (3- and 6-month), self-reported bleeding and cramping patterns with intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the contraceptive implant, and the association of these symptoms with method satisfaction. STUDY
DESIGN: We analyzed 3- and 6-month survey data from IUD and implant users in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a prospective cohort study. Participants who received a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system [LNG-IUS], copper IUD, or the etonogestrel implant) and completed their 3- and 6-month surveys were included. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to examine the association of bleeding and cramping patterns with short-term satisfaction.
RESULTS: Our analytic sample included 5011 Contraceptive CHOICE Project participants: 3001 LNG-IUS users, 826 copper IUD users, and 1184 implant users. At 3 months, >65% of LNG-IUS and implant users reported no change or decreased cramping, while 63% of copper IUD users reported increased menstrual cramping. Lighter bleeding was reported by 67% of LNG-IUS users, 58% of implant users, and 8% of copper IUD users. Satisfaction of all LARC methods was high (≥90%). LARC users with increased menstrual cramping (relative risk adjusted [RRadj], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.85), heavier bleeding (RRadj, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92), and increased bleeding frequency (RRadj, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.80) were less likely to report being very satisfied at 6 months.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of the LARC method, satisfaction at 3 and 6 months is very high. Changes in self-reported bleeding and cramping are associated with short-term LARC satisfaction.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraception; intrauterine device; long-acting reversible contraception; subdermal implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25046805      PMCID: PMC4275360          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  19 in total

1.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Contraceptive failure in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Detailed analysis of menstrual bleeding patterns after postmenstrual and postabortal insertion of a copper IUD or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  J Suvisaari; P Lähteenmäki
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  A randomized multicenter study comparing the efficacy and bleeding pattern of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule (Norplant) hormonal contraceptive implant.

Authors:  S R Zheng; H M Zheng; S Z Qian; G W Sang; R F Kaper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Bleeding patterns and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) up to two years.

Authors:  Margarete Hidalgo; Luis Bahamondes; Marcos Perrotti; Juan Diaz; Cecilia Dantas-Monteiro; Carlos Petta
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Tod Aeby
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 8.  The effects of Implanon on menstrual bleeding patterns.

Authors:  Diana Mansour; Tjeerd Korver; Maya Marintcheva-Petrova; Ian S Fraser
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Micaela O'Neil-Callahan; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Tessa Madden; Gina Secura
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Karen J Omvig; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  19 in total

1.  Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception.

Authors:  Sharon L Achilles; Beatrice A Chen; Jessica K Lee; Aileen M Gariepy; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Justin T Diedrich; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception.

Authors:  David K Turok; Alexandra Gero; Rebecca G Simmons; Jennifer E Kaiser; Gregory J Stoddard; Corinne D Sexsmith; Lori M Gawron; Jessica N Sanders
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Interventions to prevent or treat heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use.

Authors:  Karen Christelle; Mohd N Norhayati; Sharifah Halimah Jaafar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-26

5.  Preliminary side effect profile, safety, and tolerability of hormonal contraception among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy.

Authors:  Heidi S Melbostad; Deborah S Wachtel; Kerstin A Lipke; Gary J Badger; Alexis K Matusiewicz; Catalina N Rey; Lauren K MacAfee; Anne K Dougherty; Sarah H Heil
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Contraceptive Strategies in Women With Heart Failure or With Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Anjli Maroo; Johnny Chahine
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-06

7.  Patients' Experiences with an Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Program.

Authors:  Cristina Wallace Huff; Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-12-13

8.  Feasibility and Safety of IUD Insertion by Mid-Level Providers in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Felix G Mhlanga; Jennifer E Balkus; Devika Singh; Catherine Chappell; Betty Kamira; Ishana Harkoo; Daniel Szydlo; Shorai Mukaka; Jeanna Piper; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-12-17

9.  Long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the post-abortion period among women seeking abortion in mainland China: intentions and barriers.

Authors:  Zhongchen Luo; Lingling Gao; Ronald Anguzu; Juanjuan Zhao
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 10.  Unscheduled bleeding and contraceptive choice: increasing satisfaction and continuation rates.

Authors:  Jennifer Villavicencio; Rebecca H Allen
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.