Literature DB >> 33503117

VALIDATION OF A NEW WATER-PERFUSED HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY SYSTEM.

Rogério Mariotto1, Fernando A M Herbella1, Vera Lucia Ângelo Andrade2, Francisco Schlottmann1, Marco G Patti3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Water-perfused high resolution manometry system. High-resolution manometry is more costly but clinically superior to conventional manometry. Water-perfused systems may decrease costs, but it is unclear if they are as reliable as solid-state systems, and reference values are interchangeable. AIM: To validate normal values for a new water-perfusion high-resolution manometry system.
METHODS: Normative values for a 24-sensors water perfused high-resolution manometry system were validated by studying 225 individuals who underwent high resolution manometry for clinical complaints. Patients were divided in four groups: group 1 - gastroesophageal reflux disease; group 2 - achalasia; group 3 - systemic diseases with possible esophageal manifestation; and group 4 - dysphagia.
RESULTS: In group 1, a hypotonic lower esophageal sphincter was found in 49% of individuals with positive 24 h pH monitoring, and in 28% in pH-negative individuals. In groups 2 and 3, aperistalsis was found in all individuals. In group 4, only one patient (14%) had normal high-resolution manometry.
CONCLUSIONS: The normal values determined for this low-cost water-perfused HRM system with unique peristaltic pump and helicoidal sensor distribution are discriminatory of most abnormalities of esophageal motility seen in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33503117      PMCID: PMC7836072          DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020200004e1557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig        ISSN: 0102-6720


  28 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal dysfunction on psychotropic medication. A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Alessia S Maddalena; Mark Fox; Marc Hofmann; Christoph Hock
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.788

2.  Normative values and factors affecting water-perfused esophageal high-resolution impedance manometry for a Chinese population.

Authors:  P-H Tseng; R K M Wong; J-F Wu; C-C Chen; C-H Tu; Y-C Lee; H-C Lee; H-P Wang; M-S Wu
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  High-Resolution Manometry Diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated with Higher Reflux Burden.

Authors:  Chanakyaram A Reddy; Jason R Baker; Joyee Lau; Joan W Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Comparison of idiopathic achalasia and Chagas' disease esophagopathy at the light of high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  F P P Vicentine; F A M Herbella; M E Allaix; L C Silva; M G Patti
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease and connective tissue disorders: pathophysiology and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Marco G Patti; Warren J Gasper; Piero M Fisichella; Ian Nipomnick; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; M R Fox; A J Bredenoord; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Clinical and pH study characteristics in reflux patients with and without ineffective oesophageal motility (IEM).

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos; Apurva Tandon; Katerina P Shetler; John Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-19

9.  An analysis of 342 patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms using questionnaires, high-resolution manometry, and impedance-pH monitoring.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Ping Li; Guo-Zhong Ji; Lin Miao; Zhining Fan; Sihong You; Xueqin Pan; Xia Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Uses of esophageal function testing: dysphagia.

Authors:  Etsuro Yazaki; Philip Woodland; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  THE DYSPHAGIA INVESTIGATION: IS THERE STILL SPACE FOR THE VIDEOFLUOROSCOPIC METHOD?

Authors:  Charles Henrique Dias Marques; Luiz João Abrahão-Júnior; Eponina Maria Oliveira Lemme
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: ARE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? SHOULD IT BE USED CONJOINED WITH ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY FOR BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS?

Authors:  Shiwei Han; Donald E Low
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-06-24

3.  NEW CLASSIFICATION FOR ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS (CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION VERSION 4.0©) AND CHAGAS DISEASE ESOPHAGOPATHY (ACHALASIA).

Authors:  Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella; Osvaldo Malafaia; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: ARE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? USEFUL FOR EXTRA-ESOPHAGEAL SYMPTOMS?

Authors:  Marco G Patti; Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-31

5.  ANATOMIC DAMAGE OF THE LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER AFTER SUBTOTAL GASTRECTOMY.

Authors:  Owen Korn; Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Enrique Lanzarini; Ana Henríquez
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.