Literature DB >> 33503114

IS THE NEW PROCORE 20G DOUBLE FORWARD-BEVEL NEEDLE CAPABLE TO OBTAIN BETTER HISTOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSING SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS?

José Celso Ardengh1,2, Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi1,2, Mariângela Ottoboni Brunaldi2,3, Alberto Facuri Gaspar1,2, Jorge Resende Lopes-JÚnior1,2, Ajith Kumar Sankarankutty1,2, Rafael Kemp1,2, José Sebastião Dos Santos1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fine needle biopsy (FNB) histological samples by endoscopic ultrasound. It is important to obtain representative histological samples of solid biliopancreatic lesions without a clear indication for resection. The role of new needles in such task is yet to be determined. AIM: To compare performance assessment between 20G double fine needle biopsy (FNB) and conventional 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy.
METHODS: This prospective study examined 20 patients who underwent the random puncture of solid pancreatic lesions with both needles and the analysis of tissue samples by a single pathologist.
RESULTS: The ProCore 20G FNB needle provided more adequate tissue samples (16 vs. 9, p=0.039) with better cellularity quantitative scores (11 vs. 5, p=0.002) and larger diameter of the histological sample (1.51±1.3 mm vs. 0.94±0.55 mm, p=0.032) than the 22G needle. The technical success, puncture difficulty, and sample bleeding were similar between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 88.9%, 100%, and 90% and 77.8%, 100%, and 78.9% for the 20G and 22G needles, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The samples obtained with the ProCore 20G FNB showed better histological parameters; although there was no difference in the diagnostic performance between the two needles, these findings may improve pathologist performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33503114      PMCID: PMC7836075          DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020200004e1554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig        ISSN: 0102-6720


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Abdullah Alatawi; Frédéric Beuvon; Sophie Grabar; Sarah Leblanc; Stanislas Chaussade; Benoit Terris; Maximilien Barret; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Bin Cheng; Yueming Zhang; Qian Chen; Bo Sun; Zhuang Deng; Hongbo Shan; Lizhou Dou; Jinglin Wang; Yawen Li; Xiujiang Yang; Tianan Jiang; Guoliang Xu; Guiqi Wang
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Sachin Wani; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Georgios Tziatzios; Renato Cannizzaro; Nicola Muscatiello; Siddharth Singh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  False positive endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration cytology: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ferga C Gleeson; Benjamin R Kipp; Jill L Caudill; Jonathan E Clain; Amy C Clayton; Kevin C Halling; Michael R Henry; Elizabeth Rajan; Mark D Topazian; Kenneth K Wang; Maurits J Wiersema; Jun Zhang; Michael J Levy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  The frequency and cancer risk associated with the atypical cytologic diagnostic category in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis and argument for a Bethesda System for Reporting Cytopathology of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Mohammad S Abdelgawwad; Evan Alston; Isam A Eltoum
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Elia Armellini; Erminia Manfrin; Elena Trisolini; Silvano Andorno; Marco Ballarè; Laura Bernardoni; Renzo Luciano Boldorini; Armando Gabbrielli; Luca Frulloni; Alberto Larghi; Pietro Occhipinti; Aldo Scarpa; Stefano Francesco Crinò
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.

Authors:  Yousuke Nakai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Kenneth J Chang; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Rie Uchino; Suguru Mizuno; Koji Miyabayashi; Keisuke Yamamoto; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hirofumi Kogure; Takashi Sasaki; Kenji Hirano; Mariko Tanaka; Minoru Tada; Masashi Fukayama; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.

Authors:  Ravishankar Asokkumar; Chin Yung Ka; Tracy Loh; Lim Kah Ling; Tan Gek San; Hao Ying; Damien Tan; Christopher Khor; Tony Lim; Roy Soetikno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-07-24

9.  Agreement on endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue specimens: Comparing a 20-G fine-needle biopsy to a 25-G fine-needle aspiration needle among academic and non-academic pathologists.

Authors:  Priscilla A van Riet; Djuna L Cahen; Katharina Biermann; Bettina Hansen; Alberto Larghi; Guido Rindi; Giovanni Fellegara; Paolo Arcidiacono; Claudio Doglioni; Nicola Liberta Decarli; Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Ihab Abdulkader; Hector Lazare Iglesias; Masayuki Kitano; Takaaki Chikugo; Satoru Yasukawa; Hans van der Valk; Nam Quoc Nguyen; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Marc Giovannini; Flora Poizat; Schalk van der Merwe; Tania Roskams; Erwin Santo; Silvia Marmor; Kenneth Chang; Fritz Lin; James Farrell; Marie Robert; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Alan Heimann; Francisco Baldaque-Silva; Carlos Fernández Moro; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 7.559

10.  EUS-guided tissue sampling with a 20-gauge core biopsy needle for the characterization of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Filippo Antonini; Gabriele Delconte; Lorenzo Fuccio; Germana De Nucci; Carlo Fabbri; Elia Armellini; Leonardo Frazzoni; Adele Fornelli; Andrea Magarotto; Enzo Mandelli; Pietro Occhipinti; Enzo Masci; Gianpiero Manes; Giampiero Macarri
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

View more
  3 in total

1.  ELEVATED CA 19-9 IN AN ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENT: WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Authors:  José Donizeti de Meira-Júnior; Thiago Nogueira Costa; Andre Luis Montagnini; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Jose Jukemura
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-09-16

2.  SEROUS CYSTADENOMA OF PANCREAS: WHY THERE IS LOW ACCURACY IN IMAGING EXAMS?

Authors:  Enio Campos Amico; Caio Trajano Siqueira Salgado; Luisa Maciel Emerenciano; Guilherme Augusto Santos Ferreira Filho; Jose Roberto Alves; Luiz Eduardo Oliveira Forte Ferreira de Souza; José Sandro Pereira da Silva
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  MIR-203A-3P AND MMP-2 PROTEINS ARE HIGHLY EXPRESSED IN CIRCULATING TUMOR CELLS FROM PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC CARCINOMA.

Authors:  José Gabriel Rodríguez Tarazona; Emne Ali Abdallah; Bianca de Cássia Troncarelli Flores; Alexcia Camila Braun; Cláudia Malheiros Coutinho Camillo; Fabio Albuquerque Marchi; Anna Paula Carreta Ruano; Ludmilla Thome Domingos Chinen
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.