Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), first described in 1979, is a cell surface
glycoprotein complex produced by ductal cells in the pancreas, biliary system, and
epithelial cells in the stomach, colon, uterus, and salivary glands
. Its expression is only observed in patients with Lewis antigen (Le) A−B+ or
Le A+B− blood groups. Up to 6% of the Caucasian and 22% of the non-Caucasian
population are genotypically Le A−B− and therefore do not produce CA 19-9
.CA 19-9 is overexpressed in many benign and malignant, gastrointestinal, and
extra-gastrointestinal diseases. Its main implications are in pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), but it can also
be elevated in biliary, hepatocellular, gastrointestinal, urological, pulmonary,
gynecological, thyroid, and salivary gland cancers
. Benign conditions in which CA 19-9 may be elevated include pancreatitis,
pancreatic cysts, diabetes mellitus, liver fibrosis, benign cholestatic diseases,
and other urological, pulmonary, and gynecological diseases
.The aim of this article was to present a case of an asymptomatic and exuberant
elevation of the CA 19-9 with no identified etiology and a review of the clinical
use and implications of the CA 19-9.
Case Report
A 52-year-old male patient presented for gastroenterological consultation due to
an asymptomatic CA 19-9 elevation discovered in routine laboratory testing. The
patient denied any gastrointestinal complaints, had no history of previous or
current abdominal pain, jaundice, pruritus, fever, or any other biliary disease.
He had gained 0.5 kg during the pandemic period. His general practitioner had
ordered serum CA 19-9 as a routine laboratory testing. The first test result was
96,544.3 U/mL. Then, he was submitted to an abdominal computed tomography (CT)
scan (Figure 1), magnetic resonance imaging
with cholangiopancreatography, and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT (Figure 2) sequentially, which did not show
any abnormalities. An endoscopic ultrasound showed minimal dilatation of the
ventral pancreatic duct near the papilla without any lesion.
Figure 1 -
Abdominal computed tomography showing a normal image of the
pancreas.
Figure 2 -
PET-CT showing normal glycolytic metabolism.
As no etiology for this raised CA 19-9 was found, it was decided to follow the
patient with repeated dosing of the tumor marker. One month after the first
test, the CA 19-9 was 2822 U/mL; in the following month, 343 U/mL; and in the
month after, 48.3 U/mL. The final result was 20.8 U/mL.
DISCUSSION
CA 19-9 is widely used as a tumor marker related to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with
a 5-year survival rate of less than 7%
,
. CA 19-9 levels are elevated in more than 80% of patients with advanced
PC
. Nevertheless, for diagnostic purposes, most international guidelines
recommend using CA 19-9 in combination with radiological investigations, such as
pancreas protocol CT, which is the current gold standard
,
. Threshold levels for the elevated CA 19-9 regarding its diagnostic value in
PC were established at >37-40 U/mL by a systematic review
, which reported sensitivity of 79.0%, specificity of 82.0%, positive
predictive value of 72.0%, and negative predictive value of 81.0%.Up to 10-50% of benign pancreatic diseases (e.g., pancreatitis) and pre-malignant
lesions (e.g., IPMNs) have increased CA 19-9 levels (16). Therefore, CA 19-9 levels
alone cannot differentiate these from true PCs. This is one of the reasons why CA
19-9 should not be used as a screening tool for PC. CA 19-9 has limited screening
utility even in high-risk populations, such as patients with familial PC or
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, with normal results even when imaging revealed preinvasive
lesions
. Therefore, CA 19-9 plays no role in PC screening in asymptomatic
individuals.In contrast, once the diagnosis of PC is confirmed, CA 19-9 levels are extremely
important for proper staging and treatment definition. Preoperative CA 19-9 levels
are associated with PC prognosis
,
. Currently, biological staging of PC is considered for treatment planning,
and patients with anatomically resectable PC but with CA 19-9 higher than 500 IU/mL
could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy
. This cutoff comes from a large study which demonstrated that in patients
with preoperative CA 19-9 levels higher than 500 IU/ml, the resectability ratio was
less than 70% and the median survival time after resection was less than 20
months
.After the surgery, following the post-resection CA 19-9 levels prior to the
initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is an important prognostic tool and can indicate
response to therapy
,
. In the follow-up after surgical and adjuvant treatment, CA 19-9 elevations
have been shown to precede clinical/radiological recurrence by up to 6 months
.Regarding IPMNs, a pre-malignant pancreatic condition, serum CA 19-9 is considered a
“worrisome feature” when raised
. It is important to consider that the CA 19-9 alone is ineffective in
distinguishing malignant pancreatic cysts but useful when associated with other
characteristics, such as imaging or cyst size >3 cm
. Serum CA 19-9 levels >37 U/mL are a relative indication for IPMN
resection according to the European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic
neoplasms
. Cyst fluid CA 19-9 obtained from endoscopic ultrasonography-guided
fine-needle aspiration is less accurate than other cyst fluid tumor markers such as
CEA and CA 125 in differentiating between different pancreatic cystic lesions
.CA 19-9 plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of
cholangiocarcinoma. CA 19-9 above 100 U/mL on a biliary stricture with malignant
imaging features suggests perihilar colangiocarcinoma
. CA 19-9 also correlates with the prognosis of gastric cancer, including
tumor stage, vascular invasion, and lymph node and distant metastasis
. CA 19-9 levels alone are not recommended for staging gastric cancer but
should be used in combination with CEA and CA 72-4
.Benign diseases could also lead to an elevation of serum CA 19-9 levels. Cholestatic
diseases (such as choledocolitiasis) and cholangitis may raise CA 19-9 to very high
levels in the absence of malignancy. There are reports of Mirizzi syndrome with CA
19-9 of 21,068 U/mL
, making the differential diagnosis with a cholangiocarcinoma very
difficult.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinicians should be aware that there is no recommended use of CA 19-9 as a screening
test for pancreatic malignancies. It could be elevated in benign diseases, and in
patients with Le A−B−, it is expected to be negative even in the presence of
documented malignancies. Avoiding the use of CA 19-9 as a screening test in
asymptomatic patients will prevent them from unnecessary, costly, and sometimes
invasive diagnostic tests.
Authors: Joshua G Barton; John P Bois; Michael G Sarr; Christina M Wood; Rui Qin; Kristine M Thomsen; Michael L Kendrick; Michael B Farnell Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Dianne M Finkelstein; Sarah P Thayer; Alona Muzikansky; Carlos Fernandez-delCastillo; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shuji Isaji; Shugo Mizuno; John A Windsor; Claudio Bassi; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Thilo Hackert; Aoi Hayasaki; Matthew H G Katz; Sun-Whe Kim; Masashi Kishiwada; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Christoph W Michalski; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 3.996