Antonio Di Ieva1,2,3, Carlo Russo4, Sidong Liu4,5, Anne Jian4,6, Michael Y Bai4, Yi Qian4,7, John S Magnussen4,8. 1. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Human and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. antonio.diieva@mq.edu.au. 2. Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Human and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. antonio.diieva@mq.edu.au. 3. Macquarie Neurosurgery, Macquarie University, Level 2, Suite 201, 2 Technology Place, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. antonio.diieva@mq.edu.au. 4. Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Human and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. 5. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Centre for Health Informatics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. 6. Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 7. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Human and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. 8. Macquarie Medical Imaging, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Accurate brain tumor segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has wide-ranging applications such as radiosurgery planning. Advances in artificial intelligence, especially deep learning (DL), allow development of automatic segmentation that overcome the labor-intensive and operator-dependent manual segmentation. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the top-performing DL model from the 2018 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, the impact of missing MRI sequences, and whether a model trained on gliomas can accurately segment other brain tumor types. METHODS: We trained the model using Medical Decathlon dataset, applied it to the BraTS 2019 glioma dataset, and developed additional models using individual and multimodal MRI sequences. The Dice score was calculated to assess the model's accuracy compared to ground truth labels by neuroradiologists on BraTS dataset. The model was then applied to a local dataset of 105 brain tumors, performance of which was qualitatively evaluated. RESULTS: The DL model using pre- and post-gadolinium contrast T1 and T2 FLAIR sequences performed best, with a Dice score 0.878 for whole tumor, 0.732 tumor core, and 0.699 active tumor. Lack of T1 or T2 sequences did not significantly degrade performance, but FLAIR and T1C were important contributors. All segmentations performed by the model in the local dataset, including non-glioma cases, were considered accurate by a pool of specialists. CONCLUSION: The DL model could use available MRI sequences to optimize glioma segmentation and adopt transfer learning to segment non-glioma tumors, thereby serving as a useful tool to improve treatment planning and personalized surveillance of patients.
PURPOSE: Accurate brain tumor segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has wide-ranging applications such as radiosurgery planning. Advances in artificial intelligence, especially deep learning (DL), allow development of automatic segmentation that overcome the labor-intensive and operator-dependent manual segmentation. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the top-performing DL model from the 2018 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, the impact of missing MRI sequences, and whether a model trained on gliomas can accurately segment other brain tumor types. METHODS: We trained the model using Medical Decathlon dataset, applied it to the BraTS 2019 glioma dataset, and developed additional models using individual and multimodal MRI sequences. The Dice score was calculated to assess the model's accuracy compared to ground truth labels by neuroradiologists on BraTS dataset. The model was then applied to a local dataset of 105 brain tumors, performance of which was qualitatively evaluated. RESULTS: The DL model using pre- and post-gadolinium contrast T1 and T2 FLAIR sequences performed best, with a Dice score 0.878 for whole tumor, 0.732 tumor core, and 0.699 active tumor. Lack of T1 or T2 sequences did not significantly degrade performance, but FLAIR and T1C were important contributors. All segmentations performed by the model in the local dataset, including non-glioma cases, were considered accurate by a pool of specialists. CONCLUSION: The DL model could use available MRI sequences to optimize glioma segmentation and adopt transfer learning to segment non-glioma tumors, thereby serving as a useful tool to improve treatment planning and personalized surveillance of patients.
Authors: Pieter L Kubben; Alida A Postma; Alfons G H Kessels; Jacobus J van Overbeeke; Henk van Santbrink Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Matthew M Grabowski; Pablo F Recinos; Amy S Nowacki; Jason L Schroeder; Lilyana Angelov; Gene H Barnett; Michael A Vogelbaum Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Mohammad Havaei; Axel Davy; David Warde-Farley; Antoine Biard; Aaron Courville; Yoshua Bengio; Chris Pal; Pierre-Marc Jodoin; Hugo Larochelle Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Ken Chang; Andrew L Beers; Harrison X Bai; James M Brown; K Ina Ly; Xuejun Li; Joeky T Senders; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Alessandro Boaro; Chang Su; Wenya Linda Bi; Otto Rapalino; Weihua Liao; Qin Shen; Hao Zhou; Bo Xiao; Yinyan Wang; Paul J Zhang; Marco C Pinho; Patrick Y Wen; Tracy T Batchelor; Jerrold L Boxerman; Omar Arnaout; Bruce R Rosen; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Li Yang; Raymond Y Huang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 10.048