Literature DB >> 33501331

Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays With Short Focal Distance: Conditions for Mitigating Parallax-Related Registration Error.

Fabrizio Cutolo1,2, Nadia Cattari2, Umberto Fontana1,2, Vincenzo Ferrari1,2.   

Abstract

Optical see-through (OST) augmented reality head-mounted displays are quickly emerging as a key asset in several application fields but their ability to profitably assist high precision activities in the peripersonal space is still sub-optimal due to the calibration procedure required to properly model the user's viewpoint through the see-through display. In this work, we demonstrate the beneficial impact, on the parallax-related AR misregistration, of the use of optical see-through displays whose optical engines collimate the computer-generated image at a depth close to the fixation point of the user in the peripersonal space. To estimate the projection parameters of the OST display for a generic viewpoint position, our strategy relies on a dedicated parameterization of the virtual rendering camera based on a calibration routine that exploits photogrammetry techniques. We model the registration error due to the viewpoint shift and we validate it on an OST display with short focal distance. The results of the tests demonstrate that with our strategy the parallax-related registration error is submillimetric provided that the scene under observation stays within a suitable view volume that falls in a ±10 cm depth range around the focal plane of the display. This finding will pave the way to the development of new multi-focal models of OST HMDs specifically conceived to aid high-precision manual tasks in the peripersonal space.
Copyright © 2020 Cutolo, Cattari, Fontana and Ferrari.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmented reality; calibration; optical see-through displays; parallax related error; registration

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501331      PMCID: PMC7806030          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.572001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  10 in total

1.  Corneal-Imaging Calibration for Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays.

Authors:  Alexander Plopski; Yuta Itoh; Christian Nitschke; Kiyoshi Kiyokawa; Gudrun Klinker; Haruo Takemura
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  General theory of remote gaze estimation using the pupil center and corneal reflections.

Authors:  Elias Daniel Guestrin; Moshe Eizenman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Depth perception--a major issue in medical AR: evaluation study by twenty surgeons.

Authors:  Tobias Sielhorst; Christoph Bichlmeier; Sandro Michael Heining; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2006

4.  Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head-mounted display.

Authors:  Stuart J Gilson; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Letter to the Editor on "Augmented Reality Based Navigation for Computer Assisted Hip Resurfacing: A Proof of Concept Study".

Authors:  Fabrizio Cutolo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Comparison of optical see-through head-mounted displays for surgical interventions with object-anchored 2D-display.

Authors:  Long Qian; Alexander Barthel; Alex Johnson; Greg Osgood; Peter Kazanzides; Nassir Navab; Bernhard Fuerst
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  A Survey of Calibration Methods for Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays.

Authors:  Jens Grubert; Yuta Itoh; Kenneth Moser; J Edward Swan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.579

8.  Parallax Free Registration for Augmented Reality Optical See-Through Displays in the Peripersonal Space.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ferrari; Nadia Cattari; Umberto Fontana; Fabrizio Cutolo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.579

9.  How to Build a Patient-Specific Hybrid Simulator for Orthopaedic Open Surgery: Benefits and Limits of Mixed-Reality Using the Microsoft HoloLens.

Authors:  Sara Condino; Giuseppe Turini; Paolo D Parchi; Rosanna M Viglialoro; Nicola Piolanti; Marco Gesi; Mauro Ferrari; Vincenzo Ferrari
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 10.  Recent Development of Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  P Vávra; J Roman; P Zonča; P Ihnát; M Němec; J Kumar; N Habib; A El-Gendi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.682

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery, State of Art and Future Projections. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Delia Cannizzaro; Ismail Zaed; Adrian Safa; Alice J M Jelmoni; Antonio Composto; Andrea Bisoglio; Kyra Schmeizer; Ana C Becker; Andrea Pizzi; Andrea Cardia; Franco Servadei
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-11

2.  Viewpoint: Virtual and Augmented Reality in Basic and Advanced Life Support Training.

Authors:  Serena Ricci; Andrea Calandrino; Giacomo Borgonovo; Marco Chirico; Maura Casadio
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.364

3.  Advances and Innovations in Ablative Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Using Mixed Reality Technologies in Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nadia Karnatz; Henriette L Möllmann; Max Wilkat; Aida Parviz; Majeed Rana
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.