Literature DB >> 16761839

General theory of remote gaze estimation using the pupil center and corneal reflections.

Elias Daniel Guestrin1, Moshe Eizenman.   

Abstract

This paper presents a general theory for the remote estimation of the point-of-gaze (POG) from the coordinates of the centers of the pupil and corneal reflections. Corneal reflections are produced by light sources that illuminate the eye and the centers of the pupil and corneal reflections are estimated in video images from one or more cameras. The general theory covers the full range of possible system configurations. Using one camera and one light source, the POG can be estimated only if the head is completely stationary. Using one camera and multiple light sources, the POG can be estimated with free head movements, following the completion of a multiple-point calibration procedure. When multiple cameras and multiple light sources are used, the POG can be estimated following a simple one-point calibration procedure. Experimental and simulation results suggest that the main sources of gaze estimation errors are the discrepancy between the shape of real corneas and the spherical corneal shape assumed in the general theory, and the noise in the estimation of the centers of the pupil and corneal reflections. A detailed example of a system that uses the general theory to estimate the POG on a computer screen is presented.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761839     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.863952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  32 in total

1.  Optics of the human cornea influence the accuracy of stereo eye-tracking methods: a simulation study.

Authors:  A D Barsingerhorn; F N Boonstra; H H L M Goossens
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Eye tracker accuracy: quantitative evaluation of the invisible eye center location.

Authors:  Stephan Wyder; Philippe C Cattin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Automatic Calibration Method for Driver's Head Orientation in Natural Driving Environment.

Authors:  Xianping Fu; Xiao Guan; Eli Peli; Hongbo Liu; Gang Luo
Journal:  IEEE trans Intell Transp Syst       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.492

4.  Fundus motion during mfERG testing.

Authors:  Jennyffer D Smith; Allison Jussel; Rachel Wang; Daniel R Coates; Wendy W Harrison
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  A holographic waveguide based eye tracker.

Authors:  Changgeng Liu; Beatrice Pazzucconi; Juan Liu; Lei Liu; Xincheng Yao
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-19

6.  Rethinking Model-Based Gaze Estimation.

Authors:  Harsimran Kaur; Swati Jindal; Roberto Manduchi
Journal:  Proc ACM Comput Graph Interact Tech       Date:  2022-05-17

7.  Differences in attentional bias to smoking-related, affective, and sensation-seeking cues between smokers and non-smokers: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Noreen Rahmani; Jonathan Chung; Moshe Eizenman; Pingping Jiang; Helena Zhang; Peter Selby; Laurie Zawertailo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.415

8.  Tracker/Camera Calibration for Accurate Automatic Gaze Annotation of Images and Videos.

Authors:  Swati Jindal; Harsimran Kaur; Roberto Manduchi
Journal:  Proc Eye Track Res Appl Symp       Date:  2022-06-08

9.  Compensating for camera translation in video eye-movement recordings by tracking a representative landmark selected automatically by a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  A free geometry model-independent neural eye-gaze tracking system.

Authors:  Massimo Gneo; Maurizio Schmid; Silvia Conforto; Tommaso D'Alessio
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.