Literature DB >> 33501318

Inertial-Robotic Motion Tracking in End-Effector-Based Rehabilitation Robots.

Arne Passon1, Thomas Schauer1, Thomas Seel1.   

Abstract

End-effector-based robotic systems provide easy-to-set-up motion support in rehabilitation of stroke and spinal-cord-injured patients. However, measurement information is obtained only about the motion of the limb segments to which the systems are attached and not about the adjacent limb segments. We demonstrate in one particular experimental setup that this limitation can be overcome by augmenting an end-effector-based robot with a wearable inertial sensor. Most existing inertial motion tracking approaches rely on a homogeneous magnetic field and thus fail in indoor environments and near ferromagnetic materials and electronic devices. In contrast, we propose a magnetometer-free sensor fusion method. It uses a quaternion-based algorithm to track the heading of a limb segment in real time by combining the gyroscope and accelerometer readings with position measurements of one point along that segment. We apply this method to an upper-limb rehabilitation robotics use case in which the orientation and position of the forearm and elbow are known, and the orientation and position of the upper arm and shoulder are estimated by the proposed method using an inertial sensor worn on the upper arm. Experimental data from five healthy subjects who performed 282 proper executions of a typical rehabilitation motion and 163 executions with compensation motion are evaluated. Using a camera-based system as a ground truth, we demonstrate that the shoulder position and the elbow angle are tracked with median errors around 4 cm and 4°, respectively; and that undesirable compensatory shoulder movements, which were defined as shoulder displacements greater ±10 cm for more than 20% of a motion cycle, are detected and classified 100% correctly across all 445 performed motions. The results indicate that wearable inertial sensors and end-effector-based robots can be combined to provide means for effective rehabilitation therapy with likewise detailed and accurate motion tracking for performance assessment, real-time biofeedback and feedback control of robotic and neuroprosthetic motion support.
Copyright © 2020 Passon, Schauer and Seel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compensation motion detection; end-effector-based robots; inertial measurement units; posture biofeedback; real-time tracking; rehabilitation robots; sensor fusion; upper-limb rehabilitation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501318      PMCID: PMC7806092          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.554639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  42 in total

1.  Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke.

Authors:  C Gowland; H deBruin; J V Basmajian; N Plews; I Burcea
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-09

2.  Magnetic distortion in motion labs, implications for validating inertial magnetic sensors.

Authors:  W H K de Vries; H E J Veeger; C T M Baten; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 3.  What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke?

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Jeffrey A Kleim; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Kinematic reconstruction of the human arm joints in robot-aided therapies with Hermes robot.

Authors:  Arturo Bertomeu-Motos; Ricardo Morales; Luis D Lledo; Jorge A Diez; Jose M Catalan; Nicolas Garcia-Aracil
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015-08

5.  Biofeedback vs. game scores for reducing trunk compensation after stroke: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Bulmaro A Valdés; H F Machiel Van der Loos
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.119

6.  Inverse Kinematics for Upper Limb Compound Movement Estimation in Exoskeleton-Assisted Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Camilo Cortés; Ana de Los Reyes-Guzmán; Davide Scorza; Álvaro Bertelsen; Eduardo Carrasco; Ángel Gil-Agudo; Oscar Ruiz-Salguero; Julián Flórez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Estimation of Human Arm Joints Using Two Wireless Sensors in Robotic Rehabilitation Tasks.

Authors:  Arturo Bertomeu-Motos; Luis D Lledó; Jorge A Díez; Jose M Catalan; Santiago Ezquerro; Francisco J Badesa; Nicolas Garcia-Aracil
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Increasing motivation in robot-aided arm rehabilitation with competitive and cooperative gameplay.

Authors:  Domen Novak; Aniket Nagle; Urs Keller; Robert Riener
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review.

Authors:  Nurdiana Nordin; Sheng Quan Xie; Burkhard Wünsche
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  sEMG-Based Trunk Compensation Detection in Rehabilitation Training.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Yan Chen; Xiaoya Zhang; Haiqing Zheng; Song Yu; Siqi Cai; Longhan Xie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Technology-Based Compensation Assessment and Detection of Upper Extremity Activities of Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Wang; Yan Fu; Bing Ye; Jessica Babineau; Yong Ding; Alex Mihailidis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 7.076

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.